@@ -454,6 +454,6 @@ struct gc0310_resolution gc0310_res_video[] = {
#define N_RES_VIDEO (ARRAY_SIZE(gc0310_res_video))
static struct gc0310_resolution *gc0310_res = gc0310_res_preview;
-static int N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
+static unsigned long N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
#endif
@@ -668,5 +668,5 @@ struct gc2235_resolution gc2235_res_video[] = {
#define N_RES_VIDEO (ARRAY_SIZE(gc2235_res_video))
static struct gc2235_resolution *gc2235_res = gc2235_res_preview;
-static int N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
+static unsigned long N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
#endif
@@ -934,7 +934,6 @@ static struct ov2680_resolution ov2680_res_video[] = {
#define N_RES_VIDEO (ARRAY_SIZE(ov2680_res_video))
static struct ov2680_resolution *ov2680_res = ov2680_res_preview;
-static int N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
-
+static unsigned long N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
#endif
@@ -1263,5 +1263,5 @@ struct ov2722_resolution ov2722_res_video[] = {
#define N_RES_VIDEO (ARRAY_SIZE(ov2722_res_video))
static struct ov2722_resolution *ov2722_res = ov2722_res_preview;
-static int N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
+static unsigned long N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
#endif
@@ -1377,5 +1377,5 @@ struct ov5693_resolution ov5693_res_video[] = {
#define N_RES_VIDEO (ARRAY_SIZE(ov5693_res_video))
static struct ov5693_resolution *ov5693_res = ov5693_res_preview;
-static int N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
+static unsigned long N_RES = N_RES_PREVIEW;
#endif
I noticed an array underflow in ov5693_enum_frame_size(). The code looks like this: int index = fse->index; if (index >= N_RES) retur -EINVAL; fse->index is a u32 that comes from the user. We want negative values to be counted as -EINVAL but they aren't. There are several ways to fix this but I feel like the best fix for future proofing is to change the type of N_RES from int to unsigned long to make it the same as if we were comparing against ARRAY_SIZE(). Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>