@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ struct imx_device {
struct imx_vcm *vcm_driver;
struct imx_otp *otp_driver;
const struct imx_resolution *curr_res_table;
- int entries_curr_table;
+ unsigned long entries_curr_table;
const struct firmware *fw;
struct imx_reg_addr *reg_addr;
const struct imx_reg *param_hold;
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct ov8858_device {
const struct ov8858_reg *regs;
struct ov8858_vcm *vcm_driver;
const struct ov8858_resolution *curr_res_table;
- int entries_curr_table;
+ unsigned long entries_curr_table;
struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrl_handler;
struct v4l2_ctrl *run_mode;
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct ov8858_device {
const struct ov8858_reg *regs;
struct ov8858_vcm *vcm_driver;
const struct ov8858_resolution *curr_res_table;
- int entries_curr_table;
+ unsigned long entries_curr_table;
struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrl_handler;
struct v4l2_ctrl *run_mode;
The code looks in imx_enum_frame_size() looks like this: 2066 int index = fse->index; 2067 struct imx_device *dev = to_imx_sensor(sd); 2068 2069 mutex_lock(&dev->input_lock); 2070 if (index >= dev->entries_curr_table) { 2071 mutex_unlock(&dev->input_lock); 2072 return -EINVAL; 2073 } 2074 2075 fse->min_width = dev->curr_res_table[index].width; "fse->index" is a u32 that comes from the user. We want negative values of "index" to be -EINVAL so we don't read before the start of the dev->curr_res_table[] array. I've made "entries_curr_table" unsigned long to fix this. I thought about making it unsigned int, but because of struct alignment, it doesn't use more memory either way. Fixes: a49d25364dfb ("staging/atomisp: Add support for the Intel IPU v2") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>