@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ extern int dib9000_fw_pid_filter_ctrl(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u8 onoff);
extern int dib9000_fw_pid_filter(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u8 id, u16 pid, u8 onoff);
extern int dib9000_firmware_post_pll_init(struct dvb_frontend *fe);
extern int dib9000_set_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe, struct dvb_frontend *fe_slave);
-extern int dib9000_remove_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe);
extern struct dvb_frontend *dib9000_get_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe, int slave_index);
extern struct i2c_adapter *dib9000_get_component_bus_interface(struct dvb_frontend *fe);
extern int dib9000_set_i2c_adapter(struct dvb_frontend *fe, struct i2c_adapter *i2c);
@@ -97,12 +96,6 @@ static inline int dib9000_set_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe, struct dvb
return -ENODEV;
}
-static inline int dib9000_remove_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
-{
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: driver disabled by Kconfig\n", __func__);
- return -ENODEV;
-}
-
static inline struct dvb_frontend *dib9000_get_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe, int slave_index)
{
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: driver disabled by Kconfig\n", __func__);
@@ -2462,24 +2462,6 @@ int dib9000_set_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe, struct dvb_frontend *fe_
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dib9000_set_slave_frontend);
-int dib9000_remove_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
-{
- struct dib9000_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
- u8 index_frontend = 1;
-
- while ((index_frontend < MAX_NUMBER_OF_FRONTENDS) && (state->fe[index_frontend] != NULL))
- index_frontend++;
- if (index_frontend != 1) {
- dprintk("remove slave fe %p (index %i)\n", state->fe[index_frontend - 1], index_frontend - 1);
- state->fe[index_frontend] = NULL;
- return 0;
- }
-
- dprintk("no frontend to be removed\n");
- return -ENODEV;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(dib9000_remove_slave_frontend);
-
struct dvb_frontend *dib9000_get_slave_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe, int slave_index)
{
struct dib9000_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
The dib9000_remove_slave_frontend() function isn't used. I was reviewing it because my static checker claims it writes one element beyond the end of the array. That's a false positive. What it actually does is, if there are two or more front ends, then it prints a debug message to say that it removed the first one, stored in state->fe[1], and then it "removes" (scare quotes on purpose) the second one, stored in state->fe[2]. Deleting a front end from the middle is not really supported and breaks code like dib9000_release() which assumes the first NULL front end marks the end of the list. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>