| Message ID | 20190206151328.21629-9-rui.silva@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | media: staging/imx7: add i.MX7 media driver | expand |
Hi Rui, Thank you for the patch. On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:13:23PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva wrote: > This patch adds the device tree nodes for csi, video multiplexer and > mipi-csi besides the graph connecting the necessary endpoints to make > the media capture entities to work in imx7 Warp board. > > Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++ I would have split this in two patches to make backporting easier, but it's not a big deal. Please see below for a few additional comments. > 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > index 23431faecaf4..358bcae7ebaf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > @@ -277,6 +277,57 @@ > status = "okay"; > }; > > +&gpr { > + csi_mux { > + compatible = "video-mux"; > + mux-controls = <&mux 0>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + port@1 { > + reg = <1>; > + > + csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux>; > + }; > + }; > + > + port@2 { > + reg = <2>; > + > + csi_mux_to_csi: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&csi_from_csi_mux>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > +&csi { > + status = "okay"; > + > + port { > + csi_from_csi_mux: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_to_csi>; > + }; > + }; > +}; Shouldn't these two nodes, as well as port@1 of the mipi_csi node, be moved to imx7d.dtsi ? > + > +&mipi_csi { > + clock-frequency = <166000000>; > + status = "okay"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + fsl,csis-hs-settle = <3>; Shouldn't this be an endpoint property ? Different sensors connected through different endpoints could have different timing requirements. > + > + port@1 { > + reg = <1>; > + > + mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0>; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > &wdog1 { > pinctrl-names = "default"; > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_wdog>; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > index 792efcd2caa1..01962f85cab6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h> > #include "imx7d-pinfunc.h" > > / { > @@ -709,6 +710,17 @@ > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + csi: csi@30710000 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx7-csi"; > + reg = <0x30710000 0x10000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>, > + <&clks IMX7D_CSI_MCLK_ROOT_CLK>, > + <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>; > + clock-names = "axi", "mclk", "dcic"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > lcdif: lcdif@30730000 { > compatible = "fsl,imx7d-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; > reg = <0x30730000 0x10000>; > @@ -718,6 +730,21 @@ > clock-names = "pix", "axi"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + mipi_csi: mipi-csi@30750000 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx7-mipi-csi2"; > + reg = <0x30750000 0x10000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_IPG_ROOT_CLK>, > + <&clks IMX7D_MIPI_CSI_ROOT_CLK>, > + <&clks IMX7D_MIPI_DPHY_ROOT_CLK>; > + clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", "phy"; > + power-domains = <&pgc_mipi_phy>; > + phy-supply = <®_1p0d>; > + resets = <&src IMX7_RESET_MIPI_PHY_MRST>; > + reset-names = "mrst"; > + status = "disabled"; How about already declaring port@0 here too (but obviously without any endoint) ? > + }; > }; > > aips3: aips-bus@30800000 {
Hi Laurent, On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 21:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rui, > > Thank you for the patch. Where have you been for the latest 14 versions? :) This is already merged, but... follow up patches can address your issues bellow. > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:13:23PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva > wrote: >> This patch adds the device tree nodes for csi, video >> multiplexer and >> mipi-csi besides the graph connecting the necessary endpoints >> to make >> the media capture entities to work in imx7 Warp board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 51 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++ > > I would have split this in two patches to make backporting > easier, but > it's not a big deal. > > Please see below for a few additional comments. > >> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> index 23431faecaf4..358bcae7ebaf 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> @@ -277,6 +277,57 @@ >> status = "okay"; >> }; >> >> +&gpr { >> + csi_mux { >> + compatible = "video-mux"; >> + mux-controls = <&mux 0>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + port@1 { >> + reg = <1>; >> + >> + csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0: endpoint { >> + remote-endpoint = >> <&mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + port@2 { >> + reg = <2>; >> + >> + csi_mux_to_csi: endpoint { >> + remote-endpoint = >> <&csi_from_csi_mux>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; >> + >> +&csi { >> + status = "okay"; >> + >> + port { >> + csi_from_csi_mux: endpoint { >> + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_to_csi>; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; > > Shouldn't these two nodes, as well as port@1 of the mipi_csi > node, be > moved to imx7d.dtsi ? Yeah, I guess you are right here. > >> + >> +&mipi_csi { >> + clock-frequency = <166000000>; >> + status = "okay"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + fsl,csis-hs-settle = <3>; > > Shouldn't this be an endpoint property ? Different sensors > connected > through different endpoints could have different timing > requirements. Hum... I see you point, even tho the phy hs-settle is a common control. > >> + >> + port@1 { >> + reg = <1>; >> + >> + mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux: endpoint { >> + remote-endpoint = >> <&csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0>; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; >> + >> &wdog1 { >> pinctrl-names = "default"; >> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_wdog>; >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi >> index 792efcd2caa1..01962f85cab6 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ >> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> >> #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> >> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h> >> #include "imx7d-pinfunc.h" >> >> / { >> @@ -709,6 +710,17 @@ >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> + csi: csi@30710000 { >> + compatible = "fsl,imx7-csi"; >> + reg = <0x30710000 0x10000>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 >> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>, >> + <&clks >> IMX7D_CSI_MCLK_ROOT_CLK>, >> + <&clks >> IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>; >> + clock-names = "axi", "mclk", >> "dcic"; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> lcdif: lcdif@30730000 { >> compatible = "fsl,imx7d-lcdif", >> "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; >> reg = <0x30730000 0x10000>; >> @@ -718,6 +730,21 @@ >> clock-names = "pix", "axi"; >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> + >> + mipi_csi: mipi-csi@30750000 { >> + compatible = "fsl,imx7-mipi-csi2"; >> + reg = <0x30750000 0x10000>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 >> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + clocks = <&clks >> IMX7D_IPG_ROOT_CLK>, >> + <&clks >> IMX7D_MIPI_CSI_ROOT_CLK>, >> + <&clks >> IMX7D_MIPI_DPHY_ROOT_CLK>; >> + clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", >> "phy"; >> + power-domains = <&pgc_mipi_phy>; >> + phy-supply = <®_1p0d>; >> + resets = <&src >> IMX7_RESET_MIPI_PHY_MRST>; >> + reset-names = "mrst"; >> + status = "disabled"; > > How about already declaring port@0 here too (but obviously > without any > endoint) ? empty port, do not know if they make much sense. --- Cheers, Rui
Hi Rui, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 02:05:24PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva wrote: > On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 21:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Rui, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > Where have you been for the latest 14 versions? :) Elsewhere I suppose :-) > This is already merged, but... follow up patches can address your > issues bellow. I saw the driver and DT bindings patches merged in the media tree for v5.2, where have the DT patches been merged ? > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:13:23PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva > > wrote: > >> This patch adds the device tree nodes for csi, video > >> multiplexer and mipi-csi besides the graph connecting the necessary > >> endpoints to make the media capture entities to work in imx7 Warp > >> board. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > I would have split this in two patches to make backporting > > easier, but it's not a big deal. > > > > Please see below for a few additional comments. > > > >> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > >> index 23431faecaf4..358bcae7ebaf 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts > >> @@ -277,6 +277,57 @@ > >> status = "okay"; > >> }; > >> > >> +&gpr { > >> + csi_mux { > >> + compatible = "video-mux"; > >> + mux-controls = <&mux 0>; > >> + #address-cells = <1>; > >> + #size-cells = <0>; > >> + > >> + port@1 { > >> + reg = <1>; > >> + > >> + csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = > >> <&mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + port@2 { > >> + reg = <2>; > >> + > >> + csi_mux_to_csi: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = > >> <&csi_from_csi_mux>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> +}; > >> + > >> +&csi { > >> + status = "okay"; > >> + > >> + port { > >> + csi_from_csi_mux: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_to_csi>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> +}; > > > > Shouldn't these two nodes, as well as port@1 of the mipi_csi > > node, be moved to imx7d.dtsi ? > > Yeah, I guess you are right here. > > > > >> + > >> +&mipi_csi { > >> + clock-frequency = <166000000>; > >> + status = "okay"; > >> + #address-cells = <1>; > >> + #size-cells = <0>; > >> + fsl,csis-hs-settle = <3>; > > > > Shouldn't this be an endpoint property ? Different sensors connected > > through different endpoints could have different timing > > requirements. > > Hum... I see you point, even tho the phy hs-settle is a common > control. I suppose we don't need to care about DT backward compatibility if we make changes in the bindings for v5.2 ? Would you fix this, or do you want a patch ? > >> + > >> + port@1 { > >> + reg = <1>; > >> + > >> + mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> +}; > >> + > >> &wdog1 { > >> pinctrl-names = "default"; > >> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_wdog>; > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > >> index 792efcd2caa1..01962f85cab6 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi > >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > >> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > >> #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> > >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > >> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h> > >> #include "imx7d-pinfunc.h" > >> > >> / { > >> @@ -709,6 +710,17 @@ > >> status = "disabled"; > >> }; > >> > >> + csi: csi@30710000 { > >> + compatible = "fsl,imx7-csi"; > >> + reg = <0x30710000 0x10000>; > >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > >> + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>, > >> + <&clks IMX7D_CSI_MCLK_ROOT_CLK>, > >> + <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>; > >> + clock-names = "axi", "mclk", "dcic"; > >> + status = "disabled"; > >> + }; > >> + > >> lcdif: lcdif@30730000 { > >> compatible = "fsl,imx7d-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; > >> reg = <0x30730000 0x10000>; > >> @@ -718,6 +730,21 @@ > >> clock-names = "pix", "axi"; > >> status = "disabled"; > >> }; > >> + > >> + mipi_csi: mipi-csi@30750000 { > >> + compatible = "fsl,imx7-mipi-csi2"; > >> + reg = <0x30750000 0x10000>; > >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > >> + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_IPG_ROOT_CLK>, > >> + <&clks IMX7D_MIPI_CSI_ROOT_CLK>, > >> + <&clks IMX7D_MIPI_DPHY_ROOT_CLK>; > >> + clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", "phy"; > >> + power-domains = <&pgc_mipi_phy>; > >> + phy-supply = <®_1p0d>; > >> + resets = <&src IMX7_RESET_MIPI_PHY_MRST>; > >> + reset-names = "mrst"; > >> + status = "disabled"; > > > > How about already declaring port@0 here too (but obviously > > without any endoint) ? > > empty port, do not know if they make much sense. The port describes the ability to connect. There's always a port@0 for the CSI-2 receiver, so I would define it in imx7s.dtsi. If a system doesn't connect any CSI-2 sensor then no endpoint will exist (and this node will stay disabled anyway).
Hi Laurent, On Tue 12 Mar 2019 at 14:10, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Rui, > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 02:05:24PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva > wrote: >> On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 21:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > Hi Rui, >> > >> > Thank you for the patch. >> >> Where have you been for the latest 14 versions? :) > > Elsewhere I suppose :-) eheh. > >> This is already merged, but... follow up patches can address >> your >> issues bellow. > > I saw the driver and DT bindings patches merged in the media > tree for > v5.2, where have the DT patches been merged ? Good question, now that you talk I do not think they were merged. > >> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:13:23PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva >> > wrote: >> >> This patch adds the device tree nodes for csi, video >> >> multiplexer and mipi-csi besides the graph connecting the >> >> necessary >> >> endpoints to make the media capture entities to work in imx7 >> >> Warp >> >> board. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 51 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++ >> > >> > I would have split this in two patches to make backporting >> > easier, but it's not a big deal. >> > >> > Please see below for a few additional comments. >> > >> >> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> >> index 23431faecaf4..358bcae7ebaf 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts >> >> @@ -277,6 +277,57 @@ >> >> status = "okay"; >> >> }; >> >> >> >> +&gpr { >> >> + csi_mux { >> >> + compatible = "video-mux"; >> >> + mux-controls = <&mux 0>; >> >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> >> + >> >> + port@1 { >> >> + reg = <1>; >> >> + >> >> + csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0: endpoint { >> >> + remote-endpoint = >> >> <&mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux>; >> >> + }; >> >> + }; >> >> + >> >> + port@2 { >> >> + reg = <2>; >> >> + >> >> + csi_mux_to_csi: endpoint { >> >> + remote-endpoint = >> >> <&csi_from_csi_mux>; >> >> + }; >> >> + }; >> >> + }; >> >> +}; >> >> + >> >> +&csi { >> >> + status = "okay"; >> >> + >> >> + port { >> >> + csi_from_csi_mux: endpoint { >> >> + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_to_csi>; >> >> + }; >> >> + }; >> >> +}; >> > >> > Shouldn't these two nodes, as well as port@1 of the mipi_csi >> > node, be moved to imx7d.dtsi ? >> >> Yeah, I guess you are right here. >> >> > >> >> + >> >> +&mipi_csi { >> >> + clock-frequency = <166000000>; >> >> + status = "okay"; >> >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> >> + fsl,csis-hs-settle = <3>; >> > >> > Shouldn't this be an endpoint property ? Different sensors >> > connected >> > through different endpoints could have different timing >> > requirements. >> >> Hum... I see you point, even tho the phy hs-settle is a common >> control. > > I suppose we don't need to care about DT backward compatibility > if we > make changes in the bindings for v5.2 ? Would you fix this, or > do you > want a patch ? I will try to take a look at this until end of week. --- Cheers, Rui
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts index 23431faecaf4..358bcae7ebaf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts @@ -277,6 +277,57 @@ status = "okay"; }; +&gpr { + csi_mux { + compatible = "video-mux"; + mux-controls = <&mux 0>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + + csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux>; + }; + }; + + port@2 { + reg = <2>; + + csi_mux_to_csi: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&csi_from_csi_mux>; + }; + }; + }; +}; + +&csi { + status = "okay"; + + port { + csi_from_csi_mux: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_to_csi>; + }; + }; +}; + +&mipi_csi { + clock-frequency = <166000000>; + status = "okay"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + fsl,csis-hs-settle = <3>; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + + mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0>; + }; + }; +}; + &wdog1 { pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_wdog>; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi index 792efcd2caa1..01962f85cab6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h> #include "imx7d-pinfunc.h" / { @@ -709,6 +710,17 @@ status = "disabled"; }; + csi: csi@30710000 { + compatible = "fsl,imx7-csi"; + reg = <0x30710000 0x10000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>, + <&clks IMX7D_CSI_MCLK_ROOT_CLK>, + <&clks IMX7D_CLK_DUMMY>; + clock-names = "axi", "mclk", "dcic"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + lcdif: lcdif@30730000 { compatible = "fsl,imx7d-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; reg = <0x30730000 0x10000>; @@ -718,6 +730,21 @@ clock-names = "pix", "axi"; status = "disabled"; }; + + mipi_csi: mipi-csi@30750000 { + compatible = "fsl,imx7-mipi-csi2"; + reg = <0x30750000 0x10000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&clks IMX7D_IPG_ROOT_CLK>, + <&clks IMX7D_MIPI_CSI_ROOT_CLK>, + <&clks IMX7D_MIPI_DPHY_ROOT_CLK>; + clock-names = "pclk", "wrap", "phy"; + power-domains = <&pgc_mipi_phy>; + phy-supply = <®_1p0d>; + resets = <&src IMX7_RESET_MIPI_PHY_MRST>; + reset-names = "mrst"; + status = "disabled"; + }; }; aips3: aips-bus@30800000 {
This patch adds the device tree nodes for csi, video multiplexer and mipi-csi besides the graph connecting the necessary endpoints to make the media capture entities to work in imx7 Warp board. Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)