diff mbox series

[1/4] drm/msm: fix memleak on release

Message ID 20191010131333.23635-2-johan@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series treewide: fix interrupted release | expand

Commit Message

Johan Hovold Oct. 10, 2019, 1:13 p.m. UTC
If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
and fail to free related resources.

Note that the return value from release() is ignored.

Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>     # 4.18
Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Johan Hovold Oct. 30, 2019, 10:01 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> and fail to free related resources.
> 
> Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> 
> Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>     # 4.18
> Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> ---

Rob, Sean,

Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.

Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?

Thanks,
Johan

>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
>  	struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
>  	struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
>  	gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
>  	mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
Johan Hovold Nov. 12, 2019, 10:40 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > and fail to free related resources.
> > 
> > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > 
> > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
> > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>     # 4.18
> > Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> 
> Rob, Sean,
> 
> Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> 
> Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?

Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.

Johan

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >  	struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> >  	struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> >  	struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > -	int ret;
> > -
> > -	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> >  
> > +	mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> >  	gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
Daniel Vetter Nov. 12, 2019, 2:01 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > and fail to free related resources.
> > > 
> > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
> > > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>     # 4.18
> > > Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Rob, Sean,
> > 
> > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> > 
> > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
> 
> Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.

Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.

Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...

Also +Dave.
-Daniel

> 
> Johan
> 
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > >  	struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > >  	struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > >  	struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > -	int ret;
> > > -
> > > -	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > -	if (ret)
> > > -		return ret;
> > >  
> > > +	mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > >  	gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
Rob Clark Nov. 12, 2019, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:01 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > > and fail to free related resources.
> > > >
> > > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
> > > > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>     # 4.18
> > > > Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> > > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Rob, Sean,
> > >
> > > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
> >
> > Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.
>
> Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
> fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.

oh, sorry, this wasn't showing up in patchwork.. or rather it did but
the non-msm related series subject made me overlook it.

I've already sent a PR, but this shouldn't conflict with anything and
I think it can go in via drm-misc/fixes

Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

> Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
> oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...
>
> Also +Dave.
> -Daniel
>
> >
> > Johan
> >
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > > >   struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > > >   struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > > >   struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > > - int ret;
> > > > -
> > > > - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > -         return ret;
> > > >
> > > > + mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > >   gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > > >   mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
Sean Paul Nov. 12, 2019, 8:42 p.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 08:32:07AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:01 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:01:46AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > > If a process is interrupted while accessing the "gpu" debugfs file and
> > > > > the drm device struct_mutex is contended, release() could return early
> > > > > and fail to free related resources.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that the return value from release() is ignored.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 4f776f4511c7 ("drm/msm/gpu: Convert the GPU show function to use the GPU state")
> > > > > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>     # 4.18
> > > > > Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Rob, Sean,
> > > >
> > > > Sending a reminder about this one, which is not yet in linux-next.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps Daniel can pick it up otherwise?
> > >
> > > Another two weeks, another reminder. This one is still not in -next.
> >
> > Well msm is maintained in a separate tree, so the usual group maintainer
> > fallback for when patches are stuck doesn't apply.
> 
> oh, sorry, this wasn't showing up in patchwork.. or rather it did but
> the non-msm related series subject made me overlook it.
> 
> I've already sent a PR, but this shouldn't conflict with anything and
> I think it can go in via drm-misc/fixes
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>

Thanks for the patch, pushed to drm-misc-next-fixes

Sean

> 
> > Rob, Sean, time to reconsider drm-misc for msm? I think there's some more
> > oddball patches that occasionally get stuck for msm ...
> >
> > Also +Dave.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > >
> > > Johan
> > >
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > > index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
> > > > > @@ -47,12 +47,8 @@ static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > > > >   struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
> > > > >   struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
> > > > >   struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
> > > > > - int ret;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > > - if (ret)
> > > > > -         return ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > + mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> > > > >   gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
> > > > >   mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
index 6be879578140..1c74381a4fc9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
@@ -47,12 +47,8 @@  static int msm_gpu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	struct msm_gpu_show_priv *show_priv = m->private;
 	struct msm_drm_private *priv = show_priv->dev->dev_private;
 	struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
 
+	mutex_lock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
 	gpu->funcs->gpu_state_put(show_priv->state);
 	mutex_unlock(&show_priv->dev->struct_mutex);