@@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ int virtio_gpu_object_create(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
bo->dumb = params->dumb;
+ ret = virtio_gpu_object_shmem_init(vgdev, bo, &ents, &nents);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ goto err_put_id;
+
if (fence) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
objs = virtio_gpu_array_alloc(1);
@@ -248,15 +252,6 @@ int virtio_gpu_object_create(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
goto err_put_objs;
}
- ret = virtio_gpu_object_shmem_init(vgdev, bo, &ents, &nents);
- if (ret != 0) {
- if (fence)
- virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(objs);
- virtio_gpu_array_put_free(objs);
- virtio_gpu_free_object(&shmem_obj->base);
- return ret;
- }
-
if (params->blob) {
if (params->blob_mem == VIRTGPU_BLOB_MEM_GUEST)
bo->guest_blob = true;
Change the order of SHMEM initialization and reservation locking to make code cleaner and to prepare for transitioning of the common GEM SHMEM code to use the GEM's reservation lock instead of the shmem.page_lock. There is no need to lock reservation during allocation of the SHMEM pages because the lock is needed only to avoid racing with the async host-side allocation. Hence we can safely move the SHMEM initialization out of the reservation lock. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)