diff mbox series

[v4,5/7] media: qcom: camss: Add support for named power-domains

Message ID 20231103-b4-camss-named-power-domains-v4-5-33a905359dbc@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series media: qcom: camss: Introduce support for named power-domains | expand

Commit Message

Bryan O'Donoghue Nov. 3, 2023, 12:29 p.m. UTC 
Right now we use fixed indexes to assign power-domains, with a
requirement for the TOP GDSC to come last in the list.

Adding support for named power-domains means the declaration in the dtsi
can come in any order.

After this change we continue to support the old indexing - if a SoC
resource declaration or the in-use dtb doesn't declare power-domain names
we fall back to the default legacy indexing.

From this point on though new SoC additions should contain named
power-domains, eventually we will drop support for legacy indexing.

Tested-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c     | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h     |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Konrad Dybcio Nov. 18, 2023, 12:38 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 3.11.2023 13:29, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Right now we use fixed indexes to assign power-domains, with a
> requirement for the TOP GDSC to come last in the list.
> 
> Adding support for named power-domains means the declaration in the dtsi
> can come in any order.
> 
> After this change we continue to support the old indexing - if a SoC
> resource declaration or the in-use dtb doesn't declare power-domain names
> we fall back to the default legacy indexing.
> 
> From this point on though new SoC additions should contain named
> power-domains, eventually we will drop support for legacy indexing.
> 
> Tested-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
> ---
rg -l "&cc.* \{" arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom # (the bus is named cci or cciN)

arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dts
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c-navigation-mezzanine.dts
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc-d3-camera-mezzanine.dts
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5-vision-mezzanine.dts

the FP4 only has bus enablements (i.e. no attached sensors)
the number of working DB845c/RB3s is probably single-digit today

410c and rb5 are probably legit users.. part of me would like to
get rid of this messy old binding ASAP.. but then are there really
non-Bryans with these boards and the camera mezzs?

Konrad
Bryan O'Donoghue Nov. 18, 2023, 1:56 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 18/11/2023 00:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3.11.2023 13:29, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> Right now we use fixed indexes to assign power-domains, with a
>> requirement for the TOP GDSC to come last in the list.
>>
>> Adding support for named power-domains means the declaration in the dtsi
>> can come in any order.
>>
>> After this change we continue to support the old indexing - if a SoC
>> resource declaration or the in-use dtb doesn't declare power-domain names
>> we fall back to the default legacy indexing.
>>
>>  From this point on though new SoC additions should contain named
>> power-domains, eventually we will drop support for legacy indexing.
>>
>> Tested-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
>> ---
> rg -l "&cc.* \{" arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom # (the bus is named cci or cciN)
> 
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dts
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c-navigation-mezzanine.dts
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc-d3-camera-mezzanine.dts
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5-vision-mezzanine.dts
> 
> the FP4 only has bus enablements (i.e. no attached sensors)
> the number of working DB845c/RB3s is probably single-digit today
> 
> 410c and rb5 are probably legit users.. part of me would like to
> get rid of this messy old binding ASAP.. but then are there really
> non-Bryans with these boards and the camera mezzs?
> 
> Konrad

The plan here is to follow the procedures as I understand them.

- Deprecate
- Wait a reasonable amount of time ~ 1 year or so
- Drop

We could go faster but, there's no need. Drawing a line on new SoCs and 
deprecating the old way will do fine.

---
bod
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
index defff24f07ce3..123e5ead7602d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
@@ -1382,7 +1382,29 @@  int msm_vfe_subdev_init(struct camss *camss, struct vfe_device *vfe,
 	if (!res->line_num)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (res->has_pd) {
+	/* Power domain */
+
+	if (res->pd_name) {
+		vfe->genpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(camss->dev,
+							  res->pd_name);
+		if (IS_ERR(vfe->genpd)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(vfe->genpd);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!vfe->genpd && res->has_pd) {
+		/*
+		 * Legacy magic index.
+		 * Requires
+		 * power-domain = <VFE_X>,
+		 *                <VFE_Y>,
+		 *                <TITAN_TOP>
+		 * id must correspondng to the index of the VFE which must
+		 * come before the TOP GDSC. VFE Lite has no individually
+		 * collapasible domain which is why id < vfe_num is a valid
+		 * check.
+		 */
 		vfe->genpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(camss->dev, id);
 		if (IS_ERR(vfe->genpd)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(vfe->genpd);
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
index f10a47f1aee7d..d565260fee0d6 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
@@ -1523,12 +1523,28 @@  static int camss_configure_pd(struct camss *camss)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * VFE power domains are in the beginning of the list, and while all
-	 * power domains should be attached, only if TITAN_TOP power domain is
-	 * found in the list, it should be linked over here.
+	 * If a power-domain name is defined try to use it.
+	 * It is possible we are running a new kernel with an old dtb so
+	 * fallback to indexes even if a pd_name is defined but not found.
 	 */
-	camss->genpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(camss->dev, camss->genpd_num - 1);
-	if (IS_ERR(camss->genpd)) {
+	if (camss->res->pd_name) {
+		camss->genpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(camss->dev,
+							    camss->res->pd_name);
+		if (IS_ERR(camss->genpd)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(camss->genpd);
+			goto fail_pm;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!camss->genpd) {
+		/*
+		 * Legacy magic index. TITAN_TOP GDSC must be the last
+		 * item in the power-domain list.
+		 */
+		camss->genpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(camss->dev,
+							  camss->genpd_num - 1);
+	}
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(camss->genpd)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(camss->genpd);
 		goto fail_pm;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h
index 1ba824a2cb76c..cd8186fe1797b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@  struct camss_subdev_resources {
 	u32 clock_rate[CAMSS_RES_MAX][CAMSS_RES_MAX];
 	char *reg[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
 	char *interrupt[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
+	char *pd_name;
 	u8 line_num;
 	bool has_pd;
 	const void *ops;
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@  enum icc_count {
 
 struct camss_resources {
 	enum camss_version version;
+	const char *pd_name;
 	const struct camss_subdev_resources *csiphy_res;
 	const struct camss_subdev_resources *csid_res;
 	const struct camss_subdev_resources *ispif_res;