diff mbox series

[v2,3/3] media: dt-bindings: i2c: ds90ub960: Add DS90UB954 chip to DS90UB960 bindings

Message ID 20241008082049.18483-3-eagle.alexander923@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [v2,1/3] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Convert IC specific variables to enums | expand

Commit Message

Alexander Shiyan Oct. 8, 2024, 8:20 a.m. UTC
The ds90ub960 driver can now be used for the DS90UB954 chip as it has
a similar register set and configuration.
Let's add an additional compatibility line to the bindings.
---
v2: No changes

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 8, 2024, 1:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On 08/10/2024 10:20, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> The ds90ub960 driver can now be used for the DS90UB954 chip as it has
> a similar register set and configuration.
> Let's add an additional compatibility line to the bindings.
> ---
> v2: No changes

<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "to DS90UB960 bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml
index 0b71e6f911a8..86d43d949dd3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@  allOf:
 properties:
   compatible:
     enum:
+      - ti,ds90ub954-q1
       - ti,ds90ub960-q1
       - ti,ds90ub9702-q1