From patchwork Thu Dec 19 19:25:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 13915578 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243EB1AAA0A for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734636342; cv=none; b=exFlFh3/9O16DP0wXyGDFd6gzm6nAY7nIZ1Wp5tqhU3VnYIiV7ZE5IeYjWT6pibZ98mFgzHUj1uYSICNCLpgFoXtNykQnFJ57ddjNvMDJHzf7G/j9om9rNJS8HIm5xAB8TNyRCLhiQX42JtthiAb3KjU8Qbm39QrIdEx93pEoiQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734636342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fA6TPh0T5BZhzOLQelzW0UXjUDaqmQ08lURqUjCa79o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KLxSPGqqWhUxWk2b0RcSc6r+t0gRRmgfRQjWrhIVa45+TAs9tflAk0KQXHQ/EUmtezudiy2AA0lRZkokErUVeGFObHkItwU/IHaHhA0UXyTxTjmH/mbTuWZo0pEueESyJuF2pnJxiq1uBG3eViG/ZdeC1RYpGh7SRORi8GBe3gw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=SzPgFB7L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SzPgFB7L" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1734636340; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r0XCrf1gGecfh3yQl/yzNXjW/LgdagMZsIMZUH1TlxQ=; b=SzPgFB7LcYoMuSlZx2L8BPyT1cZViExfO/NvwrarhlTPhpu3y20rkzVDlppnwH6weDZGU9 MAJeknG4npiGJUNo6mUFDV0PkEBLABKjPtcX/lh0EotMMvl5PUY/PkH2ABDfxh0zN7GV6y RCIwcD80pNtbPrRm6s810hlUjH1RUSQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-438-zMUfRidSPCqLqHZ0QxRcvQ-1; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:25:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: zMUfRidSPCqLqHZ0QxRcvQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: zMUfRidSPCqLqHZ0QxRcvQ Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22862195609F; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shalem.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.60]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F4F19560A2; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:25:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Sakari Ailus , Jason Chen , Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: Hans de Goede , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] media: ov08x40: Don't log ov08x40_check_hwcfg() errors twice Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 20:25:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20241219192527.45561-3-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20241219192527.45561-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20241219192527.45561-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 All ov08x40_check_hwcfg() error-exit paths already log a detailed reason, logging a second generic "failed to check hwcfg" error is not useful, and in case of the fwnode check failing with -EPROBE_DEFER this is outright problematic flooding the log with: [ 4.557059] ov08x40 i2c-OVTI08F4:00: failed to check hwcfg: -517 [ 4.559636] ov08x40 i2c-OVTI08F4:00: failed to check hwcfg: -517 etc. messages. The one exception to all ov08x40_check_hwcfg() error-exit paths already logging an error is on v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse() errors. Make ov08x40_check_hwcfg() log an error in that case too and drop the duplicate "failed to check hwcfg: %d\n" error logging. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/media/i2c/ov08x40.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov08x40.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov08x40.c index b2af533bac0a..793246f4013e 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov08x40.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov08x40.c @@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static int ov08x40_check_hwcfg(struct ov08x40 *ov08x, struct device *dev) ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse(ep, &bus_cfg); fwnode_handle_put(ep); if (ret) - return ret; + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "parsing endpoint failed\n"); ov08x->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); @@ -2251,10 +2251,8 @@ static int ov08x40_probe(struct i2c_client *client) /* Check HW config */ ret = ov08x40_check_hwcfg(ov08x, &client->dev); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to check hwcfg: %d\n", ret); + if (ret) return ret; - } /* Initialize subdev */ v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&ov08x->sd, client, &ov08x40_subdev_ops);