@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ b. Committers' workflow: patches are handled by media committers::
On both workflows, all patches shall be properly reviewed at
linux-media@vger.kernel.org before being merged at media-committers.git.
+Such patches will be timely-reviewed by developers listed as maintainers at
+the MAINTAINERS file. Such maintainers will follow one of the above
+workflows, e. g. they will either send a pull request or merge patches
+directly at the media-committers tree.
+
When patches are picked by patchwork and when merged at media-committers,
CI bots will check for errors and may provide e-mail feedback about
patch problems. When this happens, the patch submitter must fix them
@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ be delegating part of their maintenance tasks.
Due to that, to become a committer or a core committer, a consensus between
all subsystem maintainers is required, as they all need to trust a developer
well enough to be delegated the responsibility to maintain part of the code
-and to properly review patches from third parties, in a timely manner and
-keeping the status of the reviewed code at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org
-updated.
+and to properly review patches from third parties for the drivers they are
+maintainers in a timely manner and keeping the status of the reviewed code
+at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org updated.
.. Note::
This pach is against: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/cover.1732872169.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/ During the review of the media committes profile, it was noticed that the responsibility for timely review patches was not clear: such review is expected that all developers listed at MAINTAINERS with the "M:" tag (e.g. "maintainers" on its broad sense). This is orthogonal of being a media committer or not. Such duty is implied at: Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst and at the MAINTAINERS header, when it says that even when the status is "odd fixes", the patches will flow in. So, let make it explicit at the maintainer-entry-profile that maintainers need to do timely reviews. Also, while right now our focus is on granting committer rights to maintainers, the media-committer model may evolve in the future to accept other committers that don't have such duties. So, make it clear at the media-committer.rst that the duties related to reviewing patches from others are for the drivers they are maintainers as well. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> --- Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 5 +++++ Documentation/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)