mbox series

[v2,0/4] Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml format

Message ID 1645003971-16908-1-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml format | expand

Message

Xinlei Lee (李昕磊) Feb. 16, 2022, 9:32 a.m. UTC
From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>

Changes since v1:
1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
5. Make dt_checking successful.

Xinlei Lee (4):
  dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
    format
  dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192
  dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195
  dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186

 .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml       | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt  | 44 -----------
 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt

Comments

Xinlei Lee (李昕磊) Feb. 16, 2022, 10:16 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 17:47 +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> 
> On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
> > 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
> > 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
> > 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
> > 5. Make dt_checking successful.
> > 
> > Xinlei Lee (4):
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-
> > disp.yaml
> >      format
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186
> > 
> >   .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml       | 74
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt  | 44 -----------
> >   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100755
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> >   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-
> > disp.txt
> > 
> 
> Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series?
> Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other 
> meaningful tags next time.
> 
> Thanks
> Macpaul Lin

Hi Macpaul Lin:

Thanks for your review, maybe the processing of the [PATCH] tag was
inaccurate before. 
I confirmed with my colleagues that I will keep this tag in the next
version.

Best Regards!
xinlei
Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 16, 2022, 10:19 a.m. UTC | #2
On 16/02/2022 10:47, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
>> From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
>> 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
>> 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
>> 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
>> 5. Make dt_checking successful.
>>
>> Xinlei Lee (4):
>>    dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>      format
>>    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192
>>    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195
>>    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186
>>
>>   .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml       | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt  | 44 -----------
>>   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt
>>
> 
> Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series?
> Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other 
> meaningful tags next time.


I also asked for this in v1 patchset, so it's a pity my suggestion was
not listened to.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 16, 2022, 10:24 a.m. UTC | #3
On 16/02/2022 10:32, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
> 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
> 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
> 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
> 5. Make dt_checking successful.

Any reason in changing your email address in all patches? Maybe some
mail client misconfiguration?


Best regards,
Krzysztof