| Message ID | 1604579287-25251-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [-next,v2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: Make some symbols static | expand |
On Thu, 2020-11-05 at 20:28 +0800, Zou Wei wrote: > Fix the following sparse warnings: > > ./mt8192-dai-i2s.c:2040:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_dai_i2s_get_share' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-dai-i2s.c:2060:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_dai_i2s_set_priv' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-afe-gpio.c:15:16: warning: symbol 'aud_pinctrl' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-afe-pcm.c:70:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_get_memif_pbuf_size' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-afe-pcm.c:2137:39: warning: symbol 'mt8192_afe_component' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com> Acked-by: Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com> Thanks for the fixing.
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:28:07 +0800, Zou Wei wrote: > Fix the following sparse warnings: > > ./mt8192-dai-i2s.c:2040:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_dai_i2s_get_share' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-dai-i2s.c:2060:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_dai_i2s_set_priv' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-afe-gpio.c:15:16: warning: symbol 'aud_pinctrl' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-afe-pcm.c:70:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_get_memif_pbuf_size' was not declared. Should it be static? > ./mt8192-afe-pcm.c:2137:39: warning: symbol 'mt8192_afe_component' was not declared. Should it be static? Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: Make some symbols static commit: df3d6390fa0ad48eecbe0b48acb4d364a70cd378 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-gpio.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-gpio.c index ea00088..4208820 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-gpio.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-gpio.c @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ #include "mt8192-afe-common.h" #include "mt8192-afe-gpio.h" -struct pinctrl *aud_pinctrl; +static struct pinctrl *aud_pinctrl; enum mt8192_afe_gpio { MT8192_AFE_GPIO_DAT_MISO_OFF, diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c index 4a4729f..e7fec2d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int mt8192_irq_fs(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, unsigned int rate) return mt8192_general_rate_transform(afe->dev, rate); } -int mt8192_get_memif_pbuf_size(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) +static int mt8192_get_memif_pbuf_size(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) { struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime; @@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ static int mt8192_afe_component_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) return mtk_afe_add_sub_dai_control(component); } -const struct snd_soc_component_driver mt8192_afe_component = { +static const struct snd_soc_component_driver mt8192_afe_component = { .name = AFE_PCM_NAME, .probe = mt8192_afe_component_probe, .pointer = mtk_afe_pcm_pointer, diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-i2s.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-i2s.c index 53c560e..5b29340 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-i2s.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-i2s.c @@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ static const struct mtk_afe_i2s_priv mt8192_i2s_priv[DAI_I2S_NUM] = { }, }; -int mt8192_dai_i2s_get_share(struct mtk_base_afe *afe) +static int mt8192_dai_i2s_get_share(struct mtk_base_afe *afe) { struct mt8192_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv; const struct device_node *of_node = afe->dev->of_node; @@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ int mt8192_dai_i2s_get_share(struct mtk_base_afe *afe) return 0; } -int mt8192_dai_i2s_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe) +static int mt8192_dai_i2s_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe) { int i; int ret;
Fix the following sparse warnings: ./mt8192-dai-i2s.c:2040:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_dai_i2s_get_share' was not declared. Should it be static? ./mt8192-dai-i2s.c:2060:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_dai_i2s_set_priv' was not declared. Should it be static? ./mt8192-afe-gpio.c:15:16: warning: symbol 'aud_pinctrl' was not declared. Should it be static? ./mt8192-afe-pcm.c:70:5: warning: symbol 'mt8192_get_memif_pbuf_size' was not declared. Should it be static? ./mt8192-afe-pcm.c:2137:39: warning: symbol 'mt8192_afe_component' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com> --- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-gpio.c | 2 +- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-afe-pcm.c | 4 ++-- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-i2s.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)