Message ID | 1661239875-19841-3-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Fix mtk_disp_pwm_get_state function disp_pwm enabled flag | expand |
On 23/08/2022 10:31, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > From: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > > In the original mtk_disp_pwm_get_state() function, the result of reading > con0 & BIT(0) is enabled as disp_pwm. > In order to conform to the register table, we should use the disp_pwm > base address as the enabled judgment. > > Fixes: 3f2b16734914 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()") > Signed-off-by: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> This is a fix so not really related with the change adding new device. Send them separately in the future. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 11:32 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/08/2022 10:31, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > > > > In the original mtk_disp_pwm_get_state() function, the result of > > reading > > con0 & BIT(0) is enabled as disp_pwm. > > In order to conform to the register table, we should use the > > disp_pwm > > base address as the enabled judgment. > > > > Fixes: 3f2b16734914 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API > > .get_state()") > > Signed-off-by: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > > This is a fix so not really related with the change adding new > device. > Send them separately in the future. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Hi Krzysztof: Thanks for your suggestion. If there are no other comments on this revision, I will separate them in the next edition. Best Regards! Xinlei
> In the original mtk_disp_pwm_get_state() function, the result of reading > con0 & BIT(0) is enabled as disp_pwm. > In order to conform to the register table, we should use the disp_pwm > base address as the enabled judgment. > > Fixes: 3f2b16734914 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()") > Signed-off-by: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c > index c605013e4114..50425cd1de61 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c > @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, > rate = clk_get_rate(mdp->clk_main); > con0 = readl(mdp->base + mdp->data->con0); > con1 = readl(mdp->base + mdp->data->con1); > - state->enabled = !!(con0 & BIT(0)); > + state->enabled = !!(readl(mdp->base) & BIT(0)); > clk_div = FIELD_GET(PWM_CLKDIV_MASK, con0); > period = FIELD_GET(PWM_PERIOD_MASK, con1); > /* Reviewed-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c index c605013e4114..50425cd1de61 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, rate = clk_get_rate(mdp->clk_main); con0 = readl(mdp->base + mdp->data->con0); con1 = readl(mdp->base + mdp->data->con1); - state->enabled = !!(con0 & BIT(0)); + state->enabled = !!(readl(mdp->base) & BIT(0)); clk_div = FIELD_GET(PWM_CLKDIV_MASK, con0); period = FIELD_GET(PWM_PERIOD_MASK, con1); /*