diff mbox series

[v2] mfd: mt6360: add bound check in regmap read/write function

Message ID 1664416817-31590-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] mfd: mt6360: add bound check in regmap read/write function | expand

Commit Message

ChiYuan Huang Sept. 29, 2022, 2 a.m. UTC
From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>

Fix the potential risk for null pointer if bank index is over the maximum.

Refer to the discussion list for the experiment result on mt6370.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220914013345.GA5802@cyhuang-hp-elitebook-840-g3.rt/
If not to check the bound, there is the same issue on mt6360.

Fixes: 3b0850440a06c (mfd: mt6360: Merge different sub-devices I2C read/write)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
---
Since v2:
- Assign i2c bank variable after bank index is already checked.

---
 drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

ChiYuan Huang Oct. 20, 2022, 7:46 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

cy_huang <u0084500@gmail.com> 於 2022年9月29日 週四 上午10:00寫道:
>
> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
>
> Fix the potential risk for null pointer if bank index is over the maximum.
>
> Refer to the discussion list for the experiment result on mt6370.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220914013345.GA5802@cyhuang-hp-elitebook-840-g3.rt/
> If not to check the bound, there is the same issue on mt6360.
>
> Fixes: 3b0850440a06c (mfd: mt6360: Merge different sub-devices I2C read/write)
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> ---
> Since v2:
> - Assign i2c bank variable after bank index is already checked.
>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Any comment?
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
> index 6eaa677..d3b32eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int mt6360_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
>         struct mt6360_ddata *ddata = context;
>         u8 bank = *(u8 *)reg;
>         u8 reg_addr = *(u8 *)(reg + 1);
> -       struct i2c_client *i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
> +       struct i2c_client *i2c;
>         bool crc_needed = false;
>         u8 *buf;
>         int buf_len = MT6360_ALLOC_READ_SIZE(val_size);
> @@ -410,6 +410,11 @@ static int mt6360_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
>         u8 crc;
>         int ret;
>
> +       if (bank >= MT6360_SLAVE_MAX)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
> +
>         if (bank == MT6360_SLAVE_PMIC || bank == MT6360_SLAVE_LDO) {
>                 crc_needed = true;
>                 ret = mt6360_xlate_pmicldo_addr(&reg_addr, val_size);
> @@ -453,13 +458,18 @@ static int mt6360_regmap_write(void *context, const void *val, size_t val_size)
>         struct mt6360_ddata *ddata = context;
>         u8 bank = *(u8 *)val;
>         u8 reg_addr = *(u8 *)(val + 1);
> -       struct i2c_client *i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
> +       struct i2c_client *i2c;
>         bool crc_needed = false;
>         u8 *buf;
>         int buf_len = MT6360_ALLOC_WRITE_SIZE(val_size);
>         int write_size = val_size - MT6360_REGMAP_REG_BYTE_SIZE;
>         int ret;
>
> +       if (bank >= MT6360_SLAVE_MAX)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
> +
>         if (bank == MT6360_SLAVE_PMIC || bank == MT6360_SLAVE_LDO) {
>                 crc_needed = true;
>                 ret = mt6360_xlate_pmicldo_addr(&reg_addr, val_size - MT6360_REGMAP_REG_BYTE_SIZE);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Lee Jones Oct. 31, 2022, 1:52 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, cy_huang wrote:

> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> 
> Fix the potential risk for null pointer if bank index is over the maximum.
> 
> Refer to the discussion list for the experiment result on mt6370.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220914013345.GA5802@cyhuang-hp-elitebook-840-g3.rt/
> If not to check the bound, there is the same issue on mt6360.
> 
> Fixes: 3b0850440a06c (mfd: mt6360: Merge different sub-devices I2C read/write)
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> ---
> Since v2:
> - Assign i2c bank variable after bank index is already checked.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
index 6eaa677..d3b32eb 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@  static int mt6360_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
 	struct mt6360_ddata *ddata = context;
 	u8 bank = *(u8 *)reg;
 	u8 reg_addr = *(u8 *)(reg + 1);
-	struct i2c_client *i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
+	struct i2c_client *i2c;
 	bool crc_needed = false;
 	u8 *buf;
 	int buf_len = MT6360_ALLOC_READ_SIZE(val_size);
@@ -410,6 +410,11 @@  static int mt6360_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
 	u8 crc;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (bank >= MT6360_SLAVE_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
+
 	if (bank == MT6360_SLAVE_PMIC || bank == MT6360_SLAVE_LDO) {
 		crc_needed = true;
 		ret = mt6360_xlate_pmicldo_addr(&reg_addr, val_size);
@@ -453,13 +458,18 @@  static int mt6360_regmap_write(void *context, const void *val, size_t val_size)
 	struct mt6360_ddata *ddata = context;
 	u8 bank = *(u8 *)val;
 	u8 reg_addr = *(u8 *)(val + 1);
-	struct i2c_client *i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
+	struct i2c_client *i2c;
 	bool crc_needed = false;
 	u8 *buf;
 	int buf_len = MT6360_ALLOC_WRITE_SIZE(val_size);
 	int write_size = val_size - MT6360_REGMAP_REG_BYTE_SIZE;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (bank >= MT6360_SLAVE_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	i2c = ddata->i2c[bank];
+
 	if (bank == MT6360_SLAVE_PMIC || bank == MT6360_SLAVE_LDO) {
 		crc_needed = true;
 		ret = mt6360_xlate_pmicldo_addr(&reg_addr, val_size - MT6360_REGMAP_REG_BYTE_SIZE);