diff mbox series

[next] iommu/mediatek: Fix unsigned domid comparison with less than zero

Message ID 20210203135936.23016-1-colin.king@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [next] iommu/mediatek: Fix unsigned domid comparison with less than zero | expand

Commit Message

Colin King Feb. 3, 2021, 1:59 p.m. UTC
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently the check for domid < 0 is always false because domid
is unsigned.  Fix this by making it signed.

Addresses-CoverityL ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
Fixes: ab1d5281a62b ("iommu/mediatek: Add iova reserved function")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Yong Wu (吴勇) Feb. 4, 2021, 1:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 13:59 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently the check for domid < 0 is always false because domid
> is unsigned.  Fix this by making it signed.
> 
> Addresses-CoverityL ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
> Fixes: ab1d5281a62b ("iommu/mediatek: Add iova reserved function")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Thanks for the fix.

Reviewed-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 0ad14a7604b1..823d719945b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
>  				       struct list_head *head)
>  {
>  	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> -	unsigned int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
> +	int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
>  	const struct mtk_iommu_iova_region *resv, *curdom;
>  	struct iommu_resv_region *region;
>  	int prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_READ;
Will Deacon Feb. 4, 2021, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:59:36PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently the check for domid < 0 is always false because domid
> is unsigned.  Fix this by making it signed.
> 
> Addresses-CoverityL ("Unsigned comparison against 0")

Typo here ('L' instead of ':')

> Fixes: ab1d5281a62b ("iommu/mediatek: Add iova reserved function")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 0ad14a7604b1..823d719945b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
>  				       struct list_head *head)
>  {
>  	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> -	unsigned int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
> +	int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;

Not sure if it's intentional, but this also makes 'i' signed. It probably
should remain 'unsigned' to match 'iova_region_nr' in
'struct mtk_iommu_plat_data'.

Will
Joerg Roedel Feb. 4, 2021, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:25:58AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:59:36PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > Currently the check for domid < 0 is always false because domid
> > is unsigned.  Fix this by making it signed.
> > 
> > Addresses-CoverityL ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
> 
> Typo here ('L' instead of ':')
> 
> > Fixes: ab1d5281a62b ("iommu/mediatek: Add iova reserved function")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 0ad14a7604b1..823d719945b2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
> >  				       struct list_head *head)
> >  {
> >  	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> > -	unsigned int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
> > +	int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
> 
> Not sure if it's intentional, but this also makes 'i' signed. It probably
> should remain 'unsigned' to match 'iova_region_nr' in
> 'struct mtk_iommu_plat_data'.

Yes, 'i' should stay unsigned. Colin, can you please fix that up and
re-send?

Thanks,

	Joerg
Dan Carpenter Feb. 9, 2021, 9:19 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:25:58AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:59:36PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > Currently the check for domid < 0 is always false because domid
> > is unsigned.  Fix this by making it signed.
> > 
> > Addresses-CoverityL ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
> 
> Typo here ('L' instead of ':')
> 
> > Fixes: ab1d5281a62b ("iommu/mediatek: Add iova reserved function")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 0ad14a7604b1..823d719945b2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
> >  				       struct list_head *head)
> >  {
> >  	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> > -	unsigned int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
> > +	int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
> 
> Not sure if it's intentional, but this also makes 'i' signed. It probably
> should remain 'unsigned' to match 'iova_region_nr' in
> 'struct mtk_iommu_plat_data'.


iova_region_nr is either 1 or 5 so unsigned doesn't matter.

I once almost introduced a bug where the iterator was supposed to be
size_t.  I fixed a bug by making it signed but I ended up introducing a
new bug.  But generally that's pretty rare.  The more common case is
that making iterators unsigned introduces bugs.

It's better to default to "int i;" and if more complicated types are
required that should stand out.  "size_t pg_idx;" or whatever.

regards,
dan carpenter
Walter Harms Feb. 9, 2021, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #5
I second that ...

Having i unsigned violates the rule of "least surprise".
If you need it unsigned make it clearly visible, also adding
a simple comment may help.

jm2c,
 wh
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index 0ad14a7604b1..823d719945b2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@  static void mtk_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
 				       struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
-	unsigned int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
+	int domid = mtk_iommu_get_domain_id(dev, data->plat_data), i;
 	const struct mtk_iommu_iova_region *resv, *curdom;
 	struct iommu_resv_region *region;
 	int prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_READ;