Message ID | 20220318144534.17996-4-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add driver nodes for MT8192 SoC | expand |
On 18/03/2022 15:45, Allen-KH Cheng wrote: > Add gce node for mt8192 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > index 0f9f211ca986..9e1b563bebab 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > > /dts-v1/; > #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/gce/mt8192-gce.h> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8192-pinfunc.h> > @@ -552,6 +553,15 @@ > #size-cells = <0>; > }; > > + gce: mailbox@10228000 { > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce"; > + reg = <0 0x10228000 0 0x4000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 203 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; > + #mbox-cells = <3>; #mbox-cells should be 2, right? Regards, Matthias > + clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_GCE>; > + clock-names = "gce"; > + }; > + > scp_adsp: clock-controller@10720000 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp_adsp"; > reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0x1000>;
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:24:03PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 18/03/2022 15:45, Allen-KH Cheng wrote: > > Add gce node for mt8192 SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com> > > Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > index 0f9f211ca986..9e1b563bebab 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > > /dts-v1/; > > #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h> > > +#include <dt-bindings/gce/mt8192-gce.h> > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8192-pinfunc.h> > > @@ -552,6 +553,15 @@ > > #size-cells = <0>; > > }; > > + gce: mailbox@10228000 { > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce"; > > + reg = <0 0x10228000 0 0x4000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 203 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; > > + #mbox-cells = <3>; > > #mbox-cells should be 2, right? It should indeed. The mboxes property in patch 21 should also have the third argument ("1") dropped. Thanks, Nícolas
Hi, On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 16:11 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:24:03PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > On 18/03/2022 15:45, Allen-KH Cheng wrote: > > > Add gce node for mt8192 SoC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > > > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > > index 0f9f211ca986..9e1b563bebab 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > > > /dts-v1/; > > > #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h> > > > +#include <dt-bindings/gce/mt8192-gce.h> > > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > > #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8192-pinfunc.h> > > > @@ -552,6 +553,15 @@ > > > #size-cells = <0>; > > > }; > > > + gce: mailbox@10228000 { > > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce"; > > > + reg = <0 0x10228000 0 0x4000>; > > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 203 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH > > > 0>; > > > + #mbox-cells = <3>; > > > > #mbox-cells should be 2, right? > > It should indeed. The mboxes property in patch 21 should also have > the third > argument ("1") dropped. > > Thanks, > Nícolas Thanks for the reminder. Yes,#mbox-cells should be 2 and patch 21 also need to update for this. Best regards, Allen
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi index 0f9f211ca986..9e1b563bebab 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ /dts-v1/; #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h> +#include <dt-bindings/gce/mt8192-gce.h> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8192-pinfunc.h> @@ -552,6 +553,15 @@ #size-cells = <0>; }; + gce: mailbox@10228000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce"; + reg = <0 0x10228000 0 0x4000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 203 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + #mbox-cells = <3>; + clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_GCE>; + clock-names = "gce"; + }; + scp_adsp: clock-controller@10720000 { compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp_adsp"; reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0x1000>;