| Message ID | 20220802143223.1276-3-peter.wang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ufs: allow host driver disable wb toggle druing clock scaling | expand |
On 8/2/22 07:32, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> > > Set UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING for qcom to compatible legacy design. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > index f10d4668814c..f8c9a78e7776 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > @@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static void ufs_qcom_set_caps(struct ufs_hba *hba) > struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_GATING | UFSHCD_CAP_HIBERN8_WITH_CLK_GATING; > - hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING; > + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING | UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING; > hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AUTO_BKOPS_SUSPEND; > hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN; > hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO; A patch series should be bisectable. Without this patch the previous patch in this series introduces a regression for Qualcomm controllers. So I think that the two patches should be combined into a single patch. Thanks, Bart.
On 8/3/22 2:46 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 8/2/22 07:32, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote: >> From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> >> >> Set UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING for qcom to compatible legacy design. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> >> Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> >> --- >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c >> index f10d4668814c..f8c9a78e7776 100644 >> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c >> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c >> @@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static void ufs_qcom_set_caps(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >> hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_GATING | >> UFSHCD_CAP_HIBERN8_WITH_CLK_GATING; >> - hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING; >> + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING | >> UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING; >> hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AUTO_BKOPS_SUSPEND; >> hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN; >> hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO; > > A patch series should be bisectable. Without this patch the previous > patch in this series introduces a regression for Qualcomm controllers. > So I think that the two patches should be combined into a single patch. > > Thanks, > > Bart. Hi Bart, Will combine into a single patch next version. Thanks. Peter
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c index f10d4668814c..f8c9a78e7776 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c @@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static void ufs_qcom_set_caps(struct ufs_hba *hba) struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_GATING | UFSHCD_CAP_HIBERN8_WITH_CLK_GATING; - hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING; + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING | UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING; hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AUTO_BKOPS_SUSPEND; hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN; hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;