| Message ID | 20230727062910.6337-1-andrew.yang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] zsmalloc: Fix races between modifications of fullness and isolated | expand |
On (23/07/27 14:29), Andrew Yang wrote: > > Since fullness and isolated share the same unsigned int, > modifications of them should be protected by the same lock. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> > Fixes: c4549b871102 ("zsmalloc: remove zspage isolation for migration") Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:30 PM Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Since fullness and isolated share the same unsigned int, > modifications of them should be protected by the same lock. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> > Fixes: c4549b871102 ("zsmalloc: remove zspage isolation for migration") > --- > v2: Moving comment too > --- > mm/zsmalloc.c | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c > index 32f5bc4074df..b58f957429f0 100644 > --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c > @@ -1777,6 +1777,7 @@ static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage, > > static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) > { > + struct zs_pool *pool; > struct zspage *zspage; > > /* > @@ -1786,9 +1787,10 @@ static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageIsolated(page), page); > > zspage = get_zspage(page); > - migrate_write_lock(zspage); > + pool = zspage->pool; > + spin_lock(&pool->lock); > inc_zspage_isolation(zspage); > - migrate_write_unlock(zspage); > + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); > > return true; > } > @@ -1854,12 +1856,12 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page, > kunmap_atomic(s_addr); > > replace_sub_page(class, zspage, newpage, page); > + dec_zspage_isolation(zspage); > /* > * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure, > * it's okay to release the pool's lock. > */ > spin_unlock(&pool->lock); > - dec_zspage_isolation(zspage); > migrate_write_unlock(zspage); > > get_page(newpage); > @@ -1876,14 +1878,16 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page, > > static void zs_page_putback(struct page *page) > { > + struct zs_pool *pool; > struct zspage *zspage; > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page); > > zspage = get_zspage(page); > - migrate_write_lock(zspage); > + pool = zspage->pool; > + spin_lock(&pool->lock); > dec_zspage_isolation(zspage); > - migrate_write_unlock(zspage); > + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); > } > > static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops = { > -- > 2.18.0 > > I think this fixes an issue of mine that has been bugging me for the past couple of weeks :) Thanks a lot, Andrew! This should be added to other Linux stable versions too, right? (with the caveat that before 6.2, use class's lock instead of pool's lock). Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c index 32f5bc4074df..b58f957429f0 100644 --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c @@ -1777,6 +1777,7 @@ static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage, static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) { + struct zs_pool *pool; struct zspage *zspage; /* @@ -1786,9 +1787,10 @@ static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageIsolated(page), page); zspage = get_zspage(page); - migrate_write_lock(zspage); + pool = zspage->pool; + spin_lock(&pool->lock); inc_zspage_isolation(zspage); - migrate_write_unlock(zspage); + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); return true; } @@ -1854,12 +1856,12 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page, kunmap_atomic(s_addr); replace_sub_page(class, zspage, newpage, page); + dec_zspage_isolation(zspage); /* * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure, * it's okay to release the pool's lock. */ spin_unlock(&pool->lock); - dec_zspage_isolation(zspage); migrate_write_unlock(zspage); get_page(newpage); @@ -1876,14 +1878,16 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page, static void zs_page_putback(struct page *page) { + struct zs_pool *pool; struct zspage *zspage; VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page); zspage = get_zspage(page); - migrate_write_lock(zspage); + pool = zspage->pool; + spin_lock(&pool->lock); dec_zspage_isolation(zspage); - migrate_write_unlock(zspage); + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); } static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops = {
Since fullness and isolated share the same unsigned int, modifications of them should be protected by the same lock. Signed-off-by: Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> Fixes: c4549b871102 ("zsmalloc: remove zspage isolation for migration") --- v2: Moving comment too --- mm/zsmalloc.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)