| Message ID | 20240410000730.628043-1-treapking@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Remove redundant code in lvts_ctrl_configure | expand |
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:07 AM Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org> wrote: > > The removed variable assignment is never written to the register, so it > has no effect on the device behavior. Mediatek has confirmed that it > is not required to initialize this register for current platforms, so > remove this segment to avoid confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Il 10/04/24 02:07, Pin-yen Lin ha scritto: > The removed variable assignment is never written to the register, so it > has no effect on the device behavior. Mediatek has confirmed that it > is not required to initialize this register for current platforms, so > remove this segment to avoid confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org> > Added Nicolas Pitre to the loop; Nicolas, since you're pushing support for those, can you please check if CALSCALE is used/useful/necessary on MT8186/88 before I give a R-b to this commit? P.S.: Can anyone from MediaTek please confirm if the 0x300 value is right for this register? I'd still like Linux to properly initialize the registers, even if this could technically be a default value. > --- > > drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c > index fd4bd650c77a..48d2f8ba3f18 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c > @@ -985,12 +985,6 @@ static int lvts_ctrl_configure(struct device *dev, struct lvts_ctrl *lvts_ctrl) > value = LVTS_TSSEL_CONF; > writel(value, LVTS_TSSEL(lvts_ctrl->base)); > > - /* > - * LVTS_CALSCALE : ADC voltage round > - */ > - value = 0x300; > - value = LVTS_CALSCALE_CONF; As a side note, I believe that the original author wanted to write, instead... value = LVTS_CALSCALE_CONF; writel(value, LVTS_CALSCALE(lvts_ctrl->base); Cheers, Angelo > - > /* > * LVTS_MSRCTL0 : Sensor filtering strategy > *
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c index fd4bd650c77a..48d2f8ba3f18 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c @@ -985,12 +985,6 @@ static int lvts_ctrl_configure(struct device *dev, struct lvts_ctrl *lvts_ctrl) value = LVTS_TSSEL_CONF; writel(value, LVTS_TSSEL(lvts_ctrl->base)); - /* - * LVTS_CALSCALE : ADC voltage round - */ - value = 0x300; - value = LVTS_CALSCALE_CONF; - /* * LVTS_MSRCTL0 : Sensor filtering strategy *
The removed variable assignment is never written to the register, so it has no effect on the device behavior. Mediatek has confirmed that it is not required to initialize this register for current platforms, so remove this segment to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org> --- drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)