diff mbox series

remoteproc: mediatek: Increase MT8188 SCP core0 DRAM size

Message ID 20240606090609.3199-1-jason-ch.chen@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series remoteproc: mediatek: Increase MT8188 SCP core0 DRAM size | expand

Commit Message

jason-ch chen June 6, 2024, 9:06 a.m. UTC
From: Jason Chen <Jason-ch.Chen@mediatek.com>

Increase MT8188 SCP core0 DRAM size for HEVC driver.

Signed-off-by: Jason Chen <Jason-ch.Chen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno June 6, 2024, 11 a.m. UTC | #1
Il 06/06/24 11:06, jason-ch chen ha scritto:
> From: Jason Chen <Jason-ch.Chen@mediatek.com>
> 
> Increase MT8188 SCP core0 DRAM size for HEVC driver.
> 

....so the second core only gets a maximum of 0x200000 of SRAM?
I'm not sure how useful is the secondary SCP core, at this point, with so little
available SRAM but... okay, as you wish.

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>


> Signed-off-by: Jason Chen <Jason-ch.Chen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index b885a9a041e4..2119fc62c3f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data default_scp_sizes = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data mt8188_scp_sizes = {
> -	.max_dram_size = 0x500000,
> +	.max_dram_size = 0x800000,
>   	.ipi_share_buffer_size = 600,
>   };
>
Mathieu Poirier June 10, 2024, 4:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 01:00:11PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 06/06/24 11:06, jason-ch chen ha scritto:
> > From: Jason Chen <Jason-ch.Chen@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Increase MT8188 SCP core0 DRAM size for HEVC driver.

This is telling me _what_ gets done rather than _why_ it gets done.

> > 
> 
> ....so the second core only gets a maximum of 0x200000 of SRAM?
> I'm not sure how useful is the secondary SCP core, at this point, with so little
> available SRAM but... okay, as you wish.
> 
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Chen <Jason-ch.Chen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > index b885a9a041e4..2119fc62c3f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > @@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data default_scp_sizes = {
> >   };
> >   static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data mt8188_scp_sizes = {
> > -	.max_dram_size = 0x500000,
> > +	.max_dram_size = 0x800000,

Do you require to fix a "reserved-memory" node in a device tree file to account
for this?

Thanks,
Mathieu

> >   	.ipi_share_buffer_size = 600,
> >   };
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index b885a9a041e4..2119fc62c3f2 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@  static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data default_scp_sizes = {
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data mt8188_scp_sizes = {
-	.max_dram_size = 0x500000,
+	.max_dram_size = 0x800000,
 	.ipi_share_buffer_size = 600,
 };