From patchwork Fri Apr 19 09:47:51 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 10909321 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF5D922 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8357228DB5 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 77EA628DBC; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:25:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2330028DB5 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727690AbfDSSUC (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:20:02 -0400 Received: from condef-05.nifty.com ([202.248.20.70]:50968 "EHLO condef-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727676AbfDSSUC (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:20:02 -0400 Received: from conuserg-08.nifty.com ([10.126.8.71])by condef-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9nRFx007630; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:49:27 +0900 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-08.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9mDiT012304; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:48:25 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-08.nifty.com x3J9mDiT012304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555667306; bh=IOsaHpZ2TEvCn87/LKuhI8uONRrcYXXxxmJ0Uzy6UC0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xlbpCLxWCESSMUFlvymWfpdpzfmpBy5siuyjRgmVq4MOlmuBdkmCkRFunf/87D+Au 1teXLYsl6q34ChxzjyXvCzlsrJoL0QOmDdvA0PYKn2s1+aBZS8pV9I/KELak7OVTyN f+VByoV8WYlJ6z4urXSwQi4RsjLCqrlJSjUWFxWAb45SNg+iZ3uNlUqnCLxkfLrQG1 kxiV8SvJ3aboun9kg5RdF9krWujMw6/u9rYWCOyqvYXry6TeFjPgzW0890xmD08dSR elm5jorLBqWDwDRISFcXPZ/HHz5Wd55C/sWn9rwGPBvO8yd/UGH/PczDNCg0HckLw/ OS+qlLF7podNA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy , Masahiro Yamada Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:51 +0900 Message-Id: <20190419094754.24667-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); }