diff mbox series

[RFC,23/37] KVM: MMU: Move VM-level TDP MMU state to struct kvm

Message ID 20221208193857.4090582-24-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series KVM: Refactor the KVM/x86 TDP MMU into common code | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack Dec. 8, 2022, 7:38 p.m. UTC 
Move VM-level TDP MMU state to struct kvm so it can be accessed by
common code in a future commit.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 39 --------------------------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      | 40 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c  |  8 +++----
 include/kvm/mmu_types.h         | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  8 +++++++
 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

Comments

Oliver Upton Dec. 9, 2022, 5:31 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hey David,

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:38:43AM -0800, David Matlack wrote:
> Move VM-level TDP MMU state to struct kvm so it can be accessed by
> common code in a future commit.
> 
> No functional change intended.

Could you instead introduce a structure to hold all of the MMU state and
stick that in struct kvm? If the goal is to eventually supersede all
uses of the arm64 pgtable library we are going to need the ability to
operate outside of a KVM VM context.

--
Thanks,
Oliver
David Matlack Dec. 9, 2022, 5:57 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:32 AM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hey David,
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:38:43AM -0800, David Matlack wrote:
> > Move VM-level TDP MMU state to struct kvm so it can be accessed by
> > common code in a future commit.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
>
> Could you instead introduce a structure to hold all of the MMU state and
> stick that in struct kvm? If the goal is to eventually supersede all
> uses of the arm64 pgtable library we are going to need the ability to
> operate outside of a KVM VM context.

This patch does introduce a tdp_mmu struct to hold all of the TDP MMU
state. Did you have something else in mind?
Oliver Upton Dec. 9, 2022, 6:30 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 09:57:15AM -0800, David Matlack wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:32 AM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Hey David,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:38:43AM -0800, David Matlack wrote:
> > > Move VM-level TDP MMU state to struct kvm so it can be accessed by
> > > common code in a future commit.
> > >
> > > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Could you instead introduce a structure to hold all of the MMU state and
> > stick that in struct kvm? If the goal is to eventually supersede all
> > uses of the arm64 pgtable library we are going to need the ability to
> > operate outside of a KVM VM context.
> 
> This patch does introduce a tdp_mmu struct to hold all of the TDP MMU
> state. Did you have something else in mind?

No, I'm just an idiot without caffeine. I read the patch then forgot
about it when reading the changelog. Sorry!

--
Thanks,
Oliver
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 9cf8f956bac3..95c731028452 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1272,45 +1272,6 @@  struct kvm_arch {
 	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter __rcu *pmu_event_filter;
 	struct task_struct *nx_huge_page_recovery_thread;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	/* The number of TDP MMU pages across all roots. */
-	atomic64_t tdp_mmu_pages;
-
-	/*
-	 * List of struct kvm_mmu_pages being used as roots.
-	 * All struct kvm_mmu_pages in the list should have
-	 * tdp_mmu_page set.
-	 *
-	 * For reads, this list is protected by:
-	 *	the MMU lock in read mode + RCU or
-	 *	the MMU lock in write mode
-	 *
-	 * For writes, this list is protected by:
-	 *	the MMU lock in read mode + the tdp_mmu_pages_lock or
-	 *	the MMU lock in write mode
-	 *
-	 * Roots will remain in the list until their tdp_mmu_root_count
-	 * drops to zero, at which point the thread that decremented the
-	 * count to zero should removed the root from the list and clean
-	 * it up, freeing the root after an RCU grace period.
-	 */
-	struct list_head tdp_mmu_roots;
-
-	/*
-	 * Protects accesses to the following fields when the MMU lock
-	 * is held in read mode:
-	 *  - tdp_mmu_roots (above)
-	 *  - the link field of kvm_mmu_page structs used by the TDP MMU
-	 *  - possible_nx_huge_pages;
-	 *  - the possible_nx_huge_page_link field of kvm_mmu_page structs used
-	 *    by the TDP MMU
-	 * It is acceptable, but not necessary, to acquire this lock when
-	 * the thread holds the MMU lock in write mode.
-	 */
-	spinlock_t tdp_mmu_pages_lock;
-	struct workqueue_struct *tdp_mmu_zap_wq;
-#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-
 	/*
 	 * If set, at least one shadow root has been allocated. This flag
 	 * is used as one input when determining whether certain memslot
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 24d1dbd0a1ec..b997f84c0ea7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@  int kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
 	if (!wq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots);
-	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
-	kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq = wq;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->tdp_mmu.roots);
+	spin_lock_init(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
+	kvm->tdp_mmu.zap_wq = wq;
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@  static __always_inline bool kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm,
 void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	/* Also waits for any queued work items.  */
-	destroy_workqueue(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq);
+	destroy_workqueue(kvm->tdp_mmu.zap_wq);
 
-	WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots));
+	WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages));
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->tdp_mmu.roots));
 
 	/*
 	 * Ensure that all the outstanding RCU callbacks to free shadow pages
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@  static void tdp_mmu_schedule_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root
 {
 	root->tdp_mmu_async_data = kvm;
 	INIT_WORK(&root->tdp_mmu_async_work, tdp_mmu_zap_root_work);
-	queue_work(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq, &root->tdp_mmu_async_work);
+	queue_work(kvm->tdp_mmu.zap_wq, &root->tdp_mmu_async_work);
 }
 
 static inline bool kvm_tdp_root_mark_invalid(struct kvm_mmu_page *page)
@@ -173,9 +173,9 @@  void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+	spin_lock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 	list_del_rcu(&root->link);
-	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 	call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
 }
 
@@ -198,11 +198,11 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (prev_root)
-		next_root = list_next_or_null_rcu(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots,
+		next_root = list_next_or_null_rcu(&kvm->tdp_mmu.roots,
 						  &prev_root->link,
 						  typeof(*prev_root), link);
 	else
-		next_root = list_first_or_null_rcu(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots,
+		next_root = list_first_or_null_rcu(&kvm->tdp_mmu.roots,
 						   typeof(*next_root), link);
 
 	while (next_root) {
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
 		    kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(next_root))
 			break;
 
-		next_root = list_next_or_null_rcu(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots,
+		next_root = list_next_or_null_rcu(&kvm->tdp_mmu.roots,
 				&next_root->link, typeof(*next_root), link);
 	}
 
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
  * is guaranteed to be stable.
  */
 #define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id)			\
-	list_for_each_entry(_root, &_kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link)	\
+	list_for_each_entry(_root, &_kvm->tdp_mmu.roots, link)	\
 		if (kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(_kvm, false) &&	\
 		    _root->role.as_id != _as_id) {		\
 		} else
@@ -324,9 +324,9 @@  hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	refcount_set(&root->root_refcount, 1);
 
-	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
-	list_add_rcu(&root->link, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots);
-	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+	spin_lock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
+	list_add_rcu(&root->link, &kvm->tdp_mmu.roots);
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 
 out:
 	return __pa(root->spt);
@@ -368,13 +368,13 @@  static void handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
 static void tdp_account_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, +1);
-	atomic64_inc(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
+	atomic64_inc(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages);
 }
 
 static void tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, -1);
-	atomic64_dec(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
+	atomic64_dec(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages);
 }
 
 __weak void tdp_mmu_arch_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@  void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm)
  */
 void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	flush_workqueue(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq);
+	flush_workqueue(kvm->tdp_mmu.zap_wq);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@  void kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(struct kvm *kvm)
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(root, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry(root, &kvm->tdp_mmu.roots, link) {
 		if (!root->role.invalid &&
 		    !WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(root))) {
 			root->role.invalid = true;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c
index 840d063c45b8..cc7b10f703e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c
@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@  void tdp_mmu_arch_post_link_sp(struct kvm *kvm,
 	if (fault->req_level < sp->role.level)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+	spin_lock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 	track_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
-	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 }
 
 void tdp_mmu_arch_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@  void tdp_mmu_arch_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		return;
 
 	if (shared)
-		spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+		spin_lock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 	else
 		lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@  void tdp_mmu_arch_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
 
 	if (shared)
-		spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&kvm->tdp_mmu.pages_lock);
 }
 
 int tdp_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
diff --git a/include/kvm/mmu_types.h b/include/kvm/mmu_types.h
index 07c9962f9aea..8ccc48a1cd4c 100644
--- a/include/kvm/mmu_types.h
+++ b/include/kvm/mmu_types.h
@@ -136,4 +136,44 @@  enum {
 	RET_PF_SPURIOUS,
 };
 
+struct tdp_mmu {
+	/* The number of TDP MMU pages across all roots. */
+	atomic64_t pages;
+
+	/*
+	 * List of kvm_mmu_page structs being used as roots.
+	 * All kvm_mmu_page structs in the list should have
+	 * tdp_mmu_page set.
+	 *
+	 * For reads, this list is protected by:
+	 *	the MMU lock in read mode + RCU or
+	 *	the MMU lock in write mode
+	 *
+	 * For writes, this list is protected by:
+	 *	the MMU lock in read mode + the tdp_mmu_pages_lock or
+	 *	the MMU lock in write mode
+	 *
+	 * Roots will remain in the list until their tdp_mmu_root_count
+	 * drops to zero, at which point the thread that decremented the
+	 * count to zero should removed the root from the list and clean
+	 * it up, freeing the root after an RCU grace period.
+	 */
+	struct list_head roots;
+
+	/*
+	 * Protects accesses to the following fields when the MMU lock
+	 * is held in read mode:
+	 *  - roots (above)
+	 *  - the link field of kvm_mmu_page structs used by the TDP MMU
+	 *  - (x86-only) possible_nx_huge_pages;
+	 *  - (x86-only) the arch.possible_nx_huge_page_link field of
+	 *    kvm_mmu_page structs used by the TDP MMU
+	 * It is acceptable, but not necessary, to acquire this lock when
+	 * the thread holds the MMU lock in write mode.
+	 */
+	spinlock_t pages_lock;
+
+	struct workqueue_struct *zap_wq;
+};
+
 #endif /* !__KVM_MMU_TYPES_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 469ff4202a0d..242eaed55320 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ 
 #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TDP_MMU
+#include <kvm/mmu_types.h>
+#endif
+
 #ifndef KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS
 #define KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS KVM_MAX_VCPUS
 #endif
@@ -797,6 +801,10 @@  struct kvm {
 	struct notifier_block pm_notifier;
 #endif
 	char stats_id[KVM_STATS_NAME_SIZE];
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TDP_MMU
+	struct tdp_mmu tdp_mmu;
+#endif
 };
 
 #define kvm_err(fmt, ...) \