Message ID | 20200205181935.3712-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=6BjR=3Z=kvack.org=owner-linux-mm@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39BC921 for <patchwork-linux-mm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D02C2464B for <patchwork-linux-mm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:20:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D02C2464B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 874DB6B0005; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:20:28 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 824746B0006; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:20:28 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 713AB6B0007; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:20:28 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0100.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.100]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551646B0005 for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:20:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D728F1277 for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:20:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76456888494.21.wax62_7848e22c3cb44 X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,yu-cheng.yu@intel.com,:x86@kernel.org:hpa@zytor.com:tglx@linutronix.de:mingo@redhat.com:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org:linux-doc@vger.kernel.org::linux-arch@vger.kernel.org:linux-api@vger.kernel.org:arnd@arndb.de:luto@kernel.org:bsingharora@gmail.com:bp@alien8.de:gorcunov@gmail.com:dave.hansen@linux.intel.com:esyr@redhat.com:fweimer@redhat.com:hjl.tools@gmail.com:jannh@google.com:corbet@lwn.net:keescook@chromium.org:mike.kravetz@oracle.com:nadav.amit@gmail.com:oleg@redhat.com:pavel@ucw.cz:peterz@infradead.org:rdunlap@infradead.org:ravi.v.shankar@intel.com:vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com:dave.martin@arm.com:x86-patch-review@intel.com:yu-cheng.yu@intel.com,RULES_HIT:30012:30045:30054:30055:30056:30064:30070:30074,0,RBL:134.134.136.20:@intel.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.50.0.100 64.95.201.95,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:ft,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:23,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: wax62_7848e22c3cb44 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 8337 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by imf48.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:20:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2020 10:20:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,406,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="279447733" Received: from yyu32-desk.sc.intel.com ([143.183.136.146]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2020 10:20:24 -0800 From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, x86-patch-review@intel.com Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 00/27] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:19:08 -0800 Message-Id: <20200205181935.3712-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org> |
Series |
Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack
|
expand
|
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:19:08AM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > Control-flow Enforcement (CET) is a new Intel processor feature that blocks > return/jump-oriented programming attacks. Details can be found in "Intel > 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual" [1]. At v9, this probably isn't RFC any more. :) As mentioned in another patch, I'd really like to see some self tests for this feature. It's relatively complex...