Message ID | 20200630204501.38468-1-peterx@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mm: Page fault accounting cleanups | expand |
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:45:01PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > v4: > - rebase to linux-next/akpm > - picked one more r-b I fixed some stuff in the send scripts but definitely broke something else on the chaining of the messages. Andrew, please let me know if you want me to resend... Sorry for that.
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:11:55 -0400 Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:45:01PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > > v4: > > - rebase to linux-next/akpm > > - picked one more r-b > > I fixed some stuff in the send scripts but definitely broke something else on > the chaining of the messages. Andrew, please let me know if you want me to > resend... Sorry for that. Well, the words : Since v2 changed quite a lot from v1, changelog is omitted, and I also : didn't have a chance to pick up any r-b in previous version. I really : appreciate anyone who has looked at v1. V1 for reference: make me think "not yet". But this patchset is v4, so all confused. I'm thinking we give this v4 a week for people to check it over, gather up the revews and acks, incorporate the change suggested by David, redo and double-check the cover letter then shoot for a v5?
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:05:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:11:55 -0400 Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:45:01PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > > > v4: > > > - rebase to linux-next/akpm > > > - picked one more r-b > > > > I fixed some stuff in the send scripts but definitely broke something else on > > the chaining of the messages. Andrew, please let me know if you want me to > > resend... Sorry for that. > > Well, the words > > : Since v2 changed quite a lot from v1, changelog is omitted, and I also > : didn't have a chance to pick up any r-b in previous version. I really > : appreciate anyone who has looked at v1. V1 for reference: > > make me think "not yet". But this patchset is v4, so all confused. I posted v2 & v3 with incorrect versioning, so they were all shown as v1 in the subjects. I fixed it in v4 so it seemed to have jumped from v1->v4. Sorry for the confusion. Regarding to the cover letter: I rewrote the cover letter in v2 because it changed a lot. While v3 & v4 changed little, so I kept the v2 cover letter then appended with changelogs for v3/v4 at the top because the content of the v2 cover letter still stand. > > I'm thinking we give this v4 a week for people to check it over, gather > up the revews and acks, incorporate the change suggested by David, redo > and double-check the cover letter then shoot for a v5? Will do. Thanks,