From patchwork Thu Jul 22 03:18:13 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Huang, Ying" X-Patchwork-Id: 12392847 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81043C6377C for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 03:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BF861260 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 03:18:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 29BF861260 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A55CC6B0036; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:18:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A04B46B005D; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:18:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8F3056B006C; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:18:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0019.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738776B0036 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:18:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A679182738F5 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 03:18:56 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78388767072.20.375CCCC Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2411B0058B5 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 03:18:53 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10052"; a="198760962" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,259,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="198760962" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2021 20:18:51 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,259,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="501576889" Received: from yhuang6-desk2.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.119]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2021 20:18:48 -0700 From: Huang Ying To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Huang Ying , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , Yang Shi , Zi Yan , Wei Xu , osalvador , Shakeel Butt , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [RFC -V7 0/6] NUMA balancing: optimize memory placement for memory tiering system Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:18:13 +0800 Message-Id: <20210722031819.3446711-1-ying.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of ying.huang@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.20) smtp.mailfrom=ying.huang@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C2411B0058B5 X-Stat-Signature: 6czohmwof85arzxfwk84dhtbwd8y56wi X-HE-Tag: 1626923933-523147 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: This patchset is based on mmots tree of 2021-07-15. Especially, it depends on the following patchset in mmots tree, [PATCH -V10 0/9] Migrate Pages in lieu of discard https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210715055145.195411-1-ying.huang@intel.com/ This is part of a larger patch set. If you want to apply these or play with them, I'd suggest using the tree from below, https://github.com/hying-caritas/linux/commits/mt-20210722 The changes since the last post are as follows, - Rebased on the mmots tree of 2021-07-15. - Some minor fixes. --- With the advent of various new memory types, some machines will have multiple types of memory, e.g. DRAM and PMEM (persistent memory). The memory subsystem of these machines can be called memory tiering system, because the performance of the different types of memory are usually different. After commit c221c0b0308f ("device-dax: "Hotplug" persistent memory for use like normal RAM"), the PMEM could be used as the cost-effective volatile memory in separate NUMA nodes. In a typical memory tiering system, there are CPUs, DRAM and PMEM in each physical NUMA node. The CPUs and the DRAM will be put in one logical node, while the PMEM will be put in another (faked) logical node. To optimize the system overall performance, the hot pages should be placed in DRAM node. To do that, we need to identify the hot pages in the PMEM node and migrate them to DRAM node via NUMA migration. In the original NUMA balancing, there are already a set of existing mechanisms to identify the pages recently accessed by the CPUs in a node and migrate the pages to the node. So we can reuse these mechanisms to build the mechanisms to optimize the page placement in the memory tiering system. This has been implemented in this patchset. At the other hand, the cold pages should be placed in PMEM node. So, we also need to identify the cold pages in the DRAM node and migrate them to PMEM node. In the following patchset (now in the latest mmots tree), [PATCH -V10 0/9] Migrate Pages in lieu of discard https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210715055145.195411-1-ying.huang@intel.com/ A mechanism to demote the cold DRAM pages to PMEM node under memory pressure is implemented. Based on that, the cold DRAM pages can be demoted to PMEM node proactively to free some memory space on DRAM node to accommodate the promoted hot PMEM pages. This has been implemented in this patchset too. We have tested the solution with the pmbench memory accessing benchmark with the 80:20 read/write ratio and the normal access address distribution on a 2 socket Intel server with Optane DC Persistent Memory Model. The test results of the base kernel and step by step optimizations are as follows, Throughput Promotion DRAM bandwidth access/s MB/s MB/s ----------- ---------- -------------- Base 74238178.0 4291.7 Patch 2 146050652.3 359.4 11248.6 Patch 3 146300787.1 355.2 11237.2 Patch 4 162536383.0 211.7 11890.4 Patch 5 157187775.0 105.9 10412.3 Patch 6 164028415.2 73.3 10810.6 The whole patchset improves the benchmark score up to 119.1%. The basic NUMA balancing based optimization solution (patch 1), the hot page selection algorithm (patch 4), and the threshold automatic adjustment algorithms (patch 6) improves the performance or reduce the overhead (promotion MB/s) mostly. Changelog: v7: - Rebased on the mmots tree of 2021-07-15. - Some minor fixes. v6: - Rebased on the latest page demotion patchset. (which bases on v5.11) v5: - Rebased on the latest page demotion patchset. (which bases on v5.10) v4: - Rebased on the latest page demotion patchset. (which bases on v5.9-rc6) - Add page promotion counter. v3: - Move the rate limit control as late as possible per Mel Gorman's comments. - Revise the hot page selection implementation to store page scan time in struct page. - Code cleanup. - Rebased on the latest page demotion patchset. v2: - Addressed comments for V1. - Rebased on v5.5. Best Regards, Huang, Ying