Message ID | 20220603035415.1243913-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mm: kmemleak: store objects allocated with physical address separately and check when scan | expand |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 11:54:11AM +0800, Patrick Wang wrote: > Patrick Wang (4): > mm: kmemleak: add OBJECT_PHYS flag for objects allocated with physical > address > mm: kmemleak: add rbtree for objects allocated with physical address > mm: kmemleak: handle address stored in object based on its type > mm: kmemleak: kmemleak_*_phys() set address type and check PA when > scan This looks fine at a very quick look but I'll do a in-depth review next week. One more thing needed is to remove the min_count argument to kmemleak_alloc_phys() and assume it's always 0. After this series we can't track them for leaking anyway. Thanks for putting this together.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 7:01 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 11:54:11AM +0800, Patrick Wang wrote: > > Patrick Wang (4): > > mm: kmemleak: add OBJECT_PHYS flag for objects allocated with physical > > address > > mm: kmemleak: add rbtree for objects allocated with physical address > > mm: kmemleak: handle address stored in object based on its type > > mm: kmemleak: kmemleak_*_phys() set address type and check PA when > > scan > > This looks fine at a very quick look but I'll do a in-depth review next > week. One more thing needed is to remove the min_count argument to > kmemleak_alloc_phys() and assume it's always 0. After this series we > can't track them for leaking anyway. Will do in the next version. Thanks, Patrick
On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 11:54 +0800, Patrick Wang wrote: > The kmemleak_*_phys() interface uses "min_low_pfn" and > "max_low_pfn" to check address. But on some architectures, > kmemleak_*_phys() is called before those two variables > initialized. The following steps will be taken: > > 1) Add OBJECT_PHYS flag and rbtree for the objects allocated > with physical address > 2) Store physical address in objects if allocated with OBJECT_PHYS > 3) Check the boundary when scan instead of in kmemleak_*_phys() > > This patch set will solve: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527032504.30341-1-yee.lee@mediatek.com > https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dd08bb5-f39e-53d8-f88d-bec598a08c93@gmail.com Hi Patrick, If this patchset fix the above issue, I think we need to add the below fixes tag. Fixes: 23c2d497de21 ("mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in kmemleak_*_phys()") Thanks. > > v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220531150823.1004101-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com > > v1->v2: > - add rbtree for the objects allocated with physical address > - store physical address in objects if allocated with OBJECT_PHYS > - check the upper object boundary as well and avoid duplicate check > > Patrick Wang (4): > mm: kmemleak: add OBJECT_PHYS flag for objects allocated with > physical > address > mm: kmemleak: add rbtree for objects allocated with physical > address > mm: kmemleak: handle address stored in object based on its type > mm: kmemleak: kmemleak_*_phys() set address type and check PA when > scan > > mm/kmemleak.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > ---- > 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.25.1 > >
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:46 AM Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 11:54 +0800, Patrick Wang wrote: > > The kmemleak_*_phys() interface uses "min_low_pfn" and > > "max_low_pfn" to check address. But on some architectures, > > kmemleak_*_phys() is called before those two variables > > initialized. The following steps will be taken: > > > > 1) Add OBJECT_PHYS flag and rbtree for the objects allocated > > with physical address > > 2) Store physical address in objects if allocated with OBJECT_PHYS > > 3) Check the boundary when scan instead of in kmemleak_*_phys() > > > > This patch set will solve: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527032504.30341-1-yee.lee@mediatek.com > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dd08bb5-f39e-53d8-f88d-bec598a08c93@gmail.com > > Hi Patrick, > > If this patchset fix the above issue, I think we need to add > the below fixes tag. > > Fixes: 23c2d497de21 ("mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in > kmemleak_*_phys()") Hi Kuan-Ying, Thanks for taking a look. This series should solve the false positive on ppc32 and arm64. And the false positive on arm64 is triggered by commit 23c2d497de21. So I will add the fixes tag. Thanks, Patrick