From patchwork Wed Nov 22 09:42:10 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Brown X-Patchwork-Id: 13464394 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A14BC61D9B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 21D2E6B058A; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 04:42:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1CC946B058B; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 04:42:57 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 094B76B058C; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 04:42:57 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771B6B058A for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 04:42:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8234052C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:56 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81485101152.28.15046D4 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DFE4001C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mStM9wWa; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of broonie@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=broonie@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1700646175; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to: references:dkim-signature; bh=DPVXBgFk5xP4oAYEuQzejgYcUstO8JxGzVvJG4EXdaU=; b=KS6Wf8WHCq+XI/Zfga2Ebhbb3AWalMkACRW3aX1uUlvJuo7eLm5FZbUblcXvW1jTxKWfgN oW11XOMyww2IZEi25E7FVudq3FDpXs5POQYF+eL1/7tttnxXuaCRV0QfgU4YPgoLqfb58W 7xXA9nkXNYPBMduZ7jem3ncmYRul+i0= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1700646175; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=sWKj/QTg0fgnElSc+JDyefL6OrVbzkVISVO2Fbo3HkVNfmX9MYFqkMfEAQLJ3M2p5MJPtq CRD05mjuTHE/I2NjsYmPm45y5G22I62WPmawPCeNDYr5pdPwUJA90LYvuEyBRsmZ+wnwj4 fVkgXpXLTjwcWVgd6C3pVpfpP0Mvj1I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mStM9wWa; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of broonie@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=broonie@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E52561CCD; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FC91C433C8; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1700646172; bh=uZKJnb2u5AhzIA9X+4vciaKQhiGepe0H1KhmYC0IwcM=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:Cc:From; b=mStM9wWacigBlUSqe09knkTbwekKMzDd5zJAEwJ6okaKsx9BYWSTZeYm1mA0ctn80 do5ZZnRGA+A+iEknxctJAzvLPa/DRWCUqpk6c2oxUzzkEaUrLkJVrHQ4+xxb6QS5YJ 4uoNjaQKaHEmv4AOhph3JDcrWRQXoTHiQfIBYMrq/57ktpVv+ZiICk3rNHq4D8quYM g730KwgJzAdlCtKvVAAdDW4nN/QYy74l7CMcZxJv1Q05FaqEFmQqiT+cDKMNscEdVi fvzJRNYMp/sTZyLS1sgjRhFSGULU/jh9nX0AHnC7Ns6HmiJpNBxqG8Sn6O7HR2unut FsipsXCNO7IYg== From: Mark Brown Subject: [PATCH v7 00/39] arm64/gcs: Provide support for GCS in userspace Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:10 +0000 Message-Id: <20231122-arm64-gcs-v7-0-201c483bd775@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-B4-Tracking: v=1; b=H4sIAPLMXWUC/2XOy27DIBAF0F+JWJeKl3lk1f+ougBmsFEbO4LIa hX534tTqaWyWN0R587cScWSsZLz6U4KrrnmZW7BPJ1InPw8Is3QMhFMSNYe9eWiFR1jpSg594G BNcKR9j/4ijQUP8dpF7fLdZ9eC6b8+djw+tbylOttKV+PhSvfpz/dhuuue+WU0ZAGbZKTIXj98 o5lxo/npYxkr1lFR4XqqWgUoogclIoCw4HKjkreU9loBEguOcvA2QNVf9Qy01PVqLYxedlOZto d6NBRIXo6NOowccsBtBTqQPUv5Yy5nupGjcVhAPReAfyj27Z9A7b2ig3gAQAA To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Arnd Bergmann , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Shuah Khan , "Rick P. Edgecombe" , Deepak Gupta , Ard Biesheuvel , Szabolcs Nagy Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Florian Weimer , Christian Brauner , Thiago Jung Bauermann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.13-dev-0438c X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=13583; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=uZKJnb2u5AhzIA9X+4vciaKQhiGepe0H1KhmYC0IwcM=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBlXcz28WpesSScy5xWudW7kzLCWricgXNONQStW f7tgXI1LMmJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCZV3M9gAKCRAk1otyXVSH 0NVVB/4gBoYNSuY1Oh4rqqLmn82OjtifuZDINMmJzJMVu7YXri4UWGGRfvABh4KDE6oXaUnFcP4 +iSBKs6Lxfo15ZuqoNw44g3MOvRTevQITaqq1JuV4oA19mbg9EqqFZCP1Ds48Pt9pFrbLVxo667 dJQWLb56VjUXHkdWNrUnCydfHJqsHThYBfVM5WHrYBPY3M5mPndMKQ04B14S2Kz3WQe4ddI3RqT Ci3lTLCEkW6SGmBzZ5L8o5VfAWMrFlUmZBcttfnhONxFzobEW2qc7MY5UWrBGrN3gM6/MIW7nsu l7ZUax9ZhhO2CLxwTVWY4mISiESUqlc85R4lx+UbGjOPjMqF X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E3DFE4001C X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: jnkje7cqkraajhqsbjpz7bux4k3ez83g X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-HE-Tag: 1700646174-560035 X-HE-Meta: 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 BMbA8sMT Az4MOVdJxpGB3O1aC9jz94Yjmwyu0n0FF4uk7WuMpN7qO0eBrx/SuwgTtgMm1loGhUrVasA5DFRoKpywr0dJvoSkRMMdRJKkRToj/YP89Ltrpua4l/+uZ2ZQX8mWNW3Z50YfSBR87XonVPsxDZaCxG/81xDIFmIC8jRW32xpGoXQXCgk2W28BPOpLZvNOmd5hlIJXkcm97VwBAj3w+kemECwSSLqTjTJ5IGZqD6nQMM0w06oDhrxye52AKEG8jXCxJL5n/L9HfeR+9XgvE1d2pwY6G2JQb/VYejPXWtHGwLMdrlPNDZpXZSaoU/MbYQA4Gklf1wypawLA1JH/sSTdO6e1kqXuZPFWYdj+xiAzJhABExK6EyzmLVol3JSia3D6RIIo X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: The arm64 Guarded Control Stack (GCS) feature provides support for hardware protected stacks of return addresses, intended to provide hardening against return oriented programming (ROP) attacks and to make it easier to gather call stacks for applications such as profiling. When GCS is active a secondary stack called the Guarded Control Stack is maintained, protected with a memory attribute which means that it can only be written with specific GCS operations. The current GCS pointer can not be directly written to by userspace. When a BL is executed the value stored in LR is also pushed onto the GCS, and when a RET is executed the top of the GCS is popped and compared to LR with a fault being raised if the values do not match. GCS operations may only be performed on GCS pages, a data abort is generated if they are not. The combination of hardware enforcement and lack of extra instructions in the function entry and exit paths should result in something which has less overhead and is more difficult to attack than a purely software implementation like clang's shadow stacks. This series implements support for use of GCS by userspace, along with support for use of GCS within KVM guests. It does not enable use of GCS by either EL1 or EL2, this will be implemented separately. Executables are started without GCS and must use a prctl() to enable it, it is expected that this will be done very early in application execution by the dynamic linker or other startup code. For dynamic linking this will be done by checking that everything in the executable is marked as GCS compatible. x86 has an equivalent feature called shadow stacks, this series depends on the x86 patches for generic memory management support for the new guarded/shadow stack page type and shares APIs as much as possible. As there has been extensive discussion with the wider community around the ABI for shadow stacks I have as far as practical kept implementation decisions close to those for x86, anticipating that review would lead to similar conclusions in the absence of strong reasoning for divergence. The main divergence I am concious of is that x86 allows shadow stack to be enabled and disabled repeatedly, freeing the shadow stack for the thread whenever disabled, while this implementation keeps the GCS allocated after disable but refuses to reenable it. This is to avoid races with things actively walking the GCS during a disable, we do anticipate that some systems will wish to disable GCS at runtime but are not aware of any demand for subsequently reenabling it. x86 uses an arch_prctl() to manage enable and disable, since only x86 and S/390 use arch_prctl() a generic prctl() was proposed[1] as part of a patch set for the equivalent RISC-V Zicfiss feature which I initially adopted fairly directly but following review feedback has been revised quite a bit. We currently maintain the x86 pattern of implicitly allocating a shadow stack for threads started with shadow stack enabled, there has been some discussion of removing this support and requiring the use of clone3() with explicit allocation of shadow stacks instead. I have no strong feelings either way, implicit allocation is not really consistent with anything else we do and creates the potential for errors around thread exit but on the other hand it is existing ABI on x86 and minimises the changes needed in userspace code. There is an open issue with support for CRIU, on x86 this required the ability to set the GCS mode via ptrace. This series supports configuring mode bits other than enable/disable via ptrace but it needs to be confirmed if this is sufficient. The series depends on support for shadow stacks in clone3(), that series includes the addition of ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK. https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120-clone3-shadow-stack-v3-0-a7b8ed3e2acc@kernel.org It also depends on the addition of more waitpid() flags to nolibc: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023-nolibc-waitpid-flags-v2-1-b09d096f091f@kernel.org You can see a branch with the full set of dependencies against Linus' tree at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git arm64-gcs [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230213045351.3945824-1-debug@rivosinc.com/ Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- Changes in v7: - Rebase onto v6.7-rc2 via the clone3() patch series. - Change the token used to cap the stack during signal handling to be compatible with GCSPOPM. - Fix flags for new page types. - Fold in support for clone3(). - Replace copy_to_user_gcs() with put_user_gcs(). - Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009-arm64-gcs-v6-0-78e55deaa4dd@kernel.org Changes in v6: - Rebase onto v6.6-rc3. - Add some more gcsb_dsync() barriers following spec clarifications. - Due to ongoing discussion around clone()/clone3() I've not updated anything there, the behaviour is the same as on previous versions. - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822-arm64-gcs-v5-0-9ef181dd6324@kernel.org Changes in v5: - Don't map any permissions for user GCSs, we always use EL0 accessors or use a separate mapping of the page. - Reduce the standard size of the GCS to RLIMIT_STACK/2. - Enforce a PAGE_SIZE alignment requirement on map_shadow_stack(). - Clarifications and fixes to documentation. - More tests. - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807-arm64-gcs-v4-0-68cfa37f9069@kernel.org Changes in v4: - Implement flags for map_shadow_stack() allowing the cap and end of stack marker to be enabled independently or not at all. - Relax size and alignment requirements for map_shadow_stack(). - Add more blurb explaining the advantages of hardware enforcement. - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230731-arm64-gcs-v3-0-cddf9f980d98@kernel.org Changes in v3: - Rebase onto v6.5-rc4. - Add a GCS barrier on context switch. - Add a GCS stress test. - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724-arm64-gcs-v2-0-dc2c1d44c2eb@kernel.org Changes in v2: - Rebase onto v6.5-rc3. - Rework prctl() interface to allow each bit to be locked independently. - map_shadow_stack() now places the cap token based on the size requested by the caller not the actual space allocated. - Mode changes other than enable via ptrace are now supported. - Expand test coverage. - Various smaller fixes and adjustments. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230716-arm64-gcs-v1-0-bf567f93bba6@kernel.org --- Mark Brown (39): arm64/mm: Restructure arch_validate_flags() for extensibility prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack mman: Add map_shadow_stack() flags arm64: Document boot requirements for Guarded Control Stacks arm64/gcs: Document the ABI for Guarded Control Stacks arm64/sysreg: Add new system registers for GCS arm64/sysreg: Add definitions for architected GCS caps arm64/gcs: Add manual encodings of GCS instructions arm64/gcs: Provide put_user_gcs() arm64/cpufeature: Runtime detection of Guarded Control Stack (GCS) arm64/mm: Allocate PIE slots for EL0 guarded control stack mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack KVM: arm64: Manage GCS registers for guests arm64/gcs: Allow GCS usage at EL0 and EL1 arm64/idreg: Add overrride for GCS arm64/hwcap: Add hwcap for GCS arm64/traps: Handle GCS exceptions arm64/mm: Handle GCS data aborts arm64/gcs: Context switch GCS state for EL0 arm64/gcs: Allocate a new GCS for threads with GCS enabled arm64/gcs: Implement shadow stack prctl() interface arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() arm64/signal: Set up and restore the GCS context for signal handlers arm64/signal: Expose GCS state in signal frames arm64/ptrace: Expose GCS via ptrace and core files arm64: Add Kconfig for Guarded Control Stack (GCS) kselftest/arm64: Verify the GCS hwcap kselftest/arm64: Add GCS as a detected feature in the signal tests kselftest/arm64: Add framework support for GCS to signal handling tests kselftest/arm64: Allow signals tests to specify an expected si_code kselftest/arm64: Always run signals tests with GCS enabled kselftest/arm64: Add very basic GCS test program kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS test program built with the system libc kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for GCS mode locking selftests/arm64: Add GCS signal tests kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS stress test kselftest/arm64: Enable GCS for the FP stress tests kselftest/clone3: Enable GCS in the clone3 selftests Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 + Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst | 22 + Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst | 3 + Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst | 233 +++++++ Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 2 +- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 20 + arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 + arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 17 + arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h | 28 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h | 2 + arch/arm64/include/asm/gcs.h | 107 +++ arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 4 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 + arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h | 23 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 14 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 7 + arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 20 + arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 40 ++ arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 8 + arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 9 + arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 19 + arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 23 + arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c | 2 + arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 81 +++ arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 59 ++ arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 236 ++++++- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 11 + arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h | 17 + arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 22 + arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 79 ++- arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c | 259 +++++++ arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c | 13 +- arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 + arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 55 ++ arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 3 - fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 3 + include/linux/mm.h | 16 +- include/uapi/asm-generic/mman.h | 4 + include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 22 + kernel/sys.c | 30 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c | 19 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/assembler.h | 15 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fpsimd-test.S | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-test.S | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-test.S | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-test.S | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile | 24 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/asm-offsets.h | 0 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/basic-gcs.c | 428 ++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c | 200 ++++++ .../selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-stress-thread.S | 311 +++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-stress.c | 532 +++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-util.h | 100 +++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/libc-gcs.c | 742 +++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore | 1 + .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.c | 17 +- .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h | 6 + .../selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c | 32 +- .../selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h | 39 ++ .../arm64/signal/testcases/gcs_exception_fault.c | 59 ++ .../selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/gcs_frame.c | 78 +++ .../arm64/signal/testcases/gcs_write_fault.c | 67 ++ .../selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c | 7 + .../selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 37 + 73 files changed, 4234 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 3d0134d322380292c055454d9633738733992d61 change-id: 20230303-arm64-gcs-e311ab0d8729 Best regards,