[v2,0/3] mm: Fix apply_to_pte_range() vs lazy MMU mode

Message

Alexander Gordeev April 8, 2025, 4:07 p.m. UTC

Hi All,

Chages since v1:
- left fixes only, improvements will be posted separately;
- Fixes: and -stable tags added to patch descriptions;

This series is an attempt to fix the violation of lazy MMU mode context
requirement as described for arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode():

    This mode can only be entered and left under the protection of
    the page table locks for all page tables which may be modified.

On s390 if I make arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_enable() and
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_disable() I am getting this:

    [  553.332108] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
    [  553.332117] no locks held by multipathd/2116.
    [  553.332128] CPU: 24 PID: 2116 Comm: multipathd Kdump: loaded Tainted:
    [  553.332139] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 701 (LPAR)
    [  553.332146] Call Trace:
    [  553.332152]  [<00000000158de23a>] dump_stack_lvl+0xfa/0x150
    [  553.332167]  [<0000000013e10d12>] __might_resched+0x57a/0x5e8
    [  553.332178]  [<00000000144eb6c2>] __alloc_pages+0x2ba/0x7c0
    [  553.332189]  [<00000000144d5cdc>] __get_free_pages+0x2c/0x88
    [  553.332198]  [<00000000145663f6>] kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte+0x4e/0x110
    [  553.332207]  [<000000001447625c>] apply_to_pte_range+0x164/0x3c8
    [  553.332218]  [<000000001448125a>] apply_to_pmd_range+0xda/0x318
    [  553.332226]  [<000000001448181c>] __apply_to_page_range+0x384/0x768
    [  553.332233]  [<0000000014481c28>] apply_to_page_range+0x28/0x38
    [  553.332241]  [<00000000145665da>] kasan_populate_vmalloc+0x82/0x98
    [  553.332249]  [<00000000144c88d0>] alloc_vmap_area+0x590/0x1c90
    [  553.332257]  [<00000000144ca108>] __get_vm_area_node.constprop.0+0x138/0x260
    [  553.332265]  [<00000000144d17fc>] __vmalloc_node_range+0x134/0x360
    [  553.332274]  [<0000000013d5dbf2>] alloc_thread_stack_node+0x112/0x378
    [  553.332284]  [<0000000013d62726>] dup_task_struct+0x66/0x430
    [  553.332293]  [<0000000013d63962>] copy_process+0x432/0x4b80
    [  553.332302]  [<0000000013d68300>] kernel_clone+0xf0/0x7d0
    [  553.332311]  [<0000000013d68bd6>] __do_sys_clone+0xae/0xc8
    [  553.332400]  [<0000000013d68dee>] __s390x_sys_clone+0xd6/0x118
    [  553.332410]  [<0000000013c9d34c>] do_syscall+0x22c/0x328
    [  553.332419]  [<00000000158e7366>] __do_syscall+0xce/0xf0
    [  553.332428]  [<0000000015913260>] system_call+0x70/0x98

This exposes a KASAN issue fixed with patch 1 and apply_to_pte_range()
issue fixed with patch 3, while patch 2 is a prerequisite.

Commit b9ef323ea168 ("powerpc/64s: Disable preemption in hash lazy mmu
mode") looks like powerpc-only fix, yet not entirely conforming to the
above provided requirement (page tables itself are still not protected).
If I am not mistaken, xen and sparc are alike.

Thanks!

Alexander Gordeev (3):
  kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context
  mm: Cleanup apply_to_pte_range() routine
  mm: Protect kernel pgtables in apply_to_pte_range()

 mm/kasan/shadow.c |  9 +++------
 mm/memory.c       | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)