Message ID | 1598273705-69124-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=JPLW=CC=kvack.org=owner-linux-mm@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3643A13B1 for <patchwork-linux-mm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA0720706 for <patchwork-linux-mm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0AA0720706 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 13AFB8D001D; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:47 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0F0368D001A; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E84538D001D; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0059.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.59]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F278D001A for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E16181AEF1A for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:46 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77185459092.21.song19_340ec4327053 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631B4180442C0 for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com,,RULES_HIT:30054:30070,0,RBL:47.88.44.36:@linux.alibaba.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.0.100 64.10.201.10;04y86hzpmxibmhhukwf367nw49wc4yp5p11n5c7rzx63nuuu3wi6wbzerfhxepb.ogyfxokh9mm6dntntwf9ur939ygbrdsosujhhdbk71nau6tckgjcb9x8n9dab7s.r-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:23,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: song19_340ec4327053 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2776 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com [47.88.44.36]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R941e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01353;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=21;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712; Received: from aliy80.localdomain(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:55:16 +0800 From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v18 09/32] mm/page_idle: no unlikely double check for idle page counting Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:54:42 +0800 Message-Id: <1598273705-69124-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 631B4180442C0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org> |
Series |
per memcg lru_lock
|
expand
|
diff --git a/mm/page_idle.c b/mm/page_idle.c index 057c61df12db..5fdd753e151a 100644 --- a/mm/page_idle.c +++ b/mm/page_idle.c @@ -32,19 +32,11 @@ static struct page *page_idle_get_page(unsigned long pfn) { struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn); - pg_data_t *pgdat; if (!page || !PageLRU(page) || !get_page_unless_zero(page)) return NULL; - pgdat = page_pgdat(page); - spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); - if (unlikely(!PageLRU(page))) { - put_page(page); - page = NULL; - } - spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); return page; }
As func comments mentioned, few isolated page missing be tolerated. So why not do further to drop the unlikely double check. That won't cause more idle pages, but reduce a lock contention. This is also a preparation for later new page isolation feature. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- mm/page_idle.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)