Message ID | 1598273705-69124-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=JPLW=CC=kvack.org=owner-linux-mm@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC85214E5 for <patchwork-linux-mm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3ED620838 for <patchwork-linux-mm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:56:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C3ED620838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B3F728D0014; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 904AB8D0017; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7057D8D0015; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0180.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.180]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F598D0014 for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020CB8248047 for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:36 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77185458672.27.rest30_620624327053 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F853D663 for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,136239874756a77d,d41d8cd98f00b204,alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com,,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1261:1345:1359:1431:1437:1534:1540:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3870:3871:3872:3876:4321:5007:6261:6737:6738:7514:8957:9010:10004:10241:11026:11658:11914:12043:12048:12114:12294:12297:12438:12555:12895:12986:13069:13311:13357:13846:14096:14181:14384:14394:14721:14915:21060:21080:21451:21627:21740:21990:30054,0,RBL:115.124.30.131:@linux.alibaba.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-64.201.201.201 62.20.2.100;04y86igsbunu5tpt4zna4knaphcz1ocmwz8nxpt89pu89st1uqhj81ufs7uieib.dbgccfrz4w8h6fbfx1wnk6bpakipfbs1tjxw5qqbeqzjpop8dmnsumu8tjkpw11.e-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:23,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: rest30_620624327053 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2606 Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.131]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:55:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R331e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04397;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=22;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712; Received: from aliy80.localdomain(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U6k9-bl_1598273712) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:55:15 +0800 From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH v18 07/32] mm/swap.c: stop deactivate_file_page if page not on lru Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:54:40 +0800 Message-Id: <1598273705-69124-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1598273705-69124-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C9F853D663 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org> |
Series |
per memcg lru_lock
|
expand
|
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index c674fb441fe9..ea9e1f538313 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page) * In a workload with many unevictable page such as mprotect, * unevictable page deactivation for accelerating reclaim is pointless. */ - if (PageUnevictable(page)) + if (PageUnevictable(page) || !PageLRU(page)) return; if (likely(get_page_unless_zero(page))) {
Keeping deactivate_file_page is useless if page isn't on lru list. So let's stop it. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- mm/swap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)