@@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ long memfd_pin_folios(struct file *memfd, loff_t start, loff_t end,
pgoff_t start_idx, end_idx, next_idx;
struct folio *folio = NULL;
struct folio_batch fbatch;
- struct hstate *h = NULL;
+ struct hstate *h;
long ret = -EINVAL;
if (start < 0 || start > end || !max_folios)
@@ -3662,8 +3662,6 @@ long memfd_pin_folios(struct file *memfd, loff_t start, loff_t end,
&fbatch);
if (folio) {
folio_put(folio);
- if (h)
- folio_put(folio);
folio = NULL;
}
@@ -89,13 +89,12 @@ struct folio *memfd_alloc_folio(struct file *memfd, pgoff_t idx)
numa_node_id(),
NULL,
gfp_mask);
- if (folio && folio_try_get(folio)) {
+ if (folio) {
err = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio,
memfd->f_mapping,
idx);
if (err) {
folio_put(folio);
- free_huge_folio(folio);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
folio_unlock(folio);
The folio_try_get in memfd_alloc_folio is not necessary. Delete it, and delete the matching folio_put in memfd_pin_folios. This also avoids leaking a ref if the memfd_alloc_folio call to hugetlb_add_to_page_cache fails. That error path is also broken in a second way -- when its folio_put causes the ref to become 0, it will implicitly call free_huge_folio, but then the path *explicitly* calls free_huge_folio. Delete the latter. This is a continuation of the fix "mm/hugetlb: fix memfd_pin_folios free_huge_pages leak" Fixes: 89c1905d9c14 ("mm/gup: introduce memfd_pin_folios() for pinning memfd folios") Suggested-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com> --- mm/gup.c | 4 +--- mm/memfd.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)