diff mbox series

[v2,3/3] userfaultfd: selftest: recycle lock threads first

Message ID 20180930074259.18229-4-peterx@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series userfaultfd: selftests: cleanups and trivial fixes | expand

Commit Message

Peter Xu Sept. 30, 2018, 7:42 a.m. UTC 
Now we recycle the uffd servicing threads earlier than the lock
threads.  It might happen that when the lock thread is still blocked at
a pthread mutex lock while the servicing thread has already quitted for
the cpu so the lock thread will be blocked forever and hang the test
program.  To fix the possible race, recycle the lock threads first.

This never happens with current missing-only tests, but when I start to
run the write-protection tests (the feature is not yet posted upstream)
it happens every time of the run possibly because in that new test we'll
need to service two page faults for each lock operation.

Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index 7a8c6937cc67..5d1db824f73a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -626,6 +626,12 @@  static int stress(unsigned long *userfaults)
 	if (uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_src))
 		return 1;
 
+
+	finished = 1;
+	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++)
+		if (pthread_join(locking_threads[cpu], NULL))
+			return 1;
+
 	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
 		char c;
 		if (bounces & BOUNCE_POLL) {
@@ -643,11 +649,6 @@  static int stress(unsigned long *userfaults)
 		}
 	}
 
-	finished = 1;
-	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++)
-		if (pthread_join(locking_threads[cpu], NULL))
-			return 1;
-
 	return 0;
 }