| Message ID | 20191118032610.182862-2-zhongjiang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [4.19] memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning. | expand |
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:26:08AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: > The commit 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") > introduces the following warning messages. > > *WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins* > > It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. > We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 5859705dafe1..9e68a4320a0e 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void memfd_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages); radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->i_pages, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + page = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &mapping->i_pages.xa_lock); if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
The commit 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") introduces the following warning messages. *WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins* It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock. We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> --- mm/memfd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)