@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct io_wqe {
struct io_wqe_acct acct[2];
struct hlist_nulls_head free_list;
- struct hlist_nulls_head busy_list;
struct list_head all_list;
struct io_wq *wq;
@@ -327,7 +326,6 @@ static void __io_worker_busy(struct io_w
if (worker->flags & IO_WORKER_F_FREE) {
worker->flags &= ~IO_WORKER_F_FREE;
hlist_nulls_del_init_rcu(&worker->nulls_node);
- hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&worker->nulls_node, &wqe->busy_list);
}
/*
@@ -365,7 +363,6 @@ static bool __io_worker_idle(struct io_w
{
if (!(worker->flags & IO_WORKER_F_FREE)) {
worker->flags |= IO_WORKER_F_FREE;
- hlist_nulls_del_init_rcu(&worker->nulls_node);
hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&worker->nulls_node, &wqe->free_list);
}
@@ -805,10 +802,6 @@ void io_wq_cancel_all(struct io_wq *wq)
set_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_CANCEL, &wq->state);
- /*
- * Browse both lists, as there's a gap between handing work off
- * to a worker and the worker putting itself on the busy_list
- */
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_node(node) {
struct io_wqe *wqe = wq->wqes[node];
@@ -1058,7 +1051,6 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned boun
spin_lock_init(&wqe->lock);
INIT_WQ_LIST(&wqe->work_list);
INIT_HLIST_NULLS_HEAD(&wqe->free_list, 0);
- INIT_HLIST_NULLS_HEAD(&wqe->busy_list, 1);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wqe->all_list);
}
Commit e61df66c69b1 ("io-wq: ensure free/busy list browsing see all items") added a list for io workers in addition to the free and busy lists, not only making worker walk cleaner but leaving the busy list to be at most a nice vase. Time to remove it now. Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> ---