@@ -1270,26 +1270,22 @@ static struct anon_vma *reusable_anon_vm
*/
struct anon_vma *find_mergeable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
- struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
- struct vm_area_struct *near;
+ struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
- near = vma->vm_next;
- if (!near)
- goto try_prev;
+ /* Try next first. */
+ if (vma->vm_next) {
+ anon_vma = reusable_anon_vma(vma->vm_next, vma, vma->vm_next);
+ if (anon_vma)
+ return anon_vma;
+ }
- anon_vma = reusable_anon_vma(near, vma, near);
- if (anon_vma)
- return anon_vma;
-try_prev:
- near = vma->vm_prev;
- if (!near)
- goto none;
+ /* Try prev next. */
+ if (vma->vm_prev)
+ anon_vma = reusable_anon_vma(vma->vm_prev, vma->vm_prev, vma);
- anon_vma = reusable_anon_vma(near, near, vma);
- if (anon_vma)
- return anon_vma;
-none:
/*
+ * We might reach here with anon_vma == NULL if we can't find
+ * any reusable anon_vma.
* There's no absolute need to look only at touching neighbours:
* we could search further afield for "compatible" anon_vmas.
* But it would probably just be a waste of time searching,
@@ -1297,7 +1293,7 @@ none:
* We're trying to allow mprotect remerging later on,
* not trying to minimize memory used for anon_vmas.
*/
- return NULL;
+ return anon_vma;
}
/*