diff mbox series

[RFC,16/16] KVM: Unmap protected pages from direct mapping

Message ID 20200522125214.31348-17-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM protected memory extension | expand

Commit Message

Kirill A . Shutemov May 22, 2020, 12:52 p.m. UTC
If the protected memory feature enabled, unmap guest memory from
kernel's direct mappings.

Migration and KSM is disabled for protected memory as it would require a
special treatment.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c |  1 +
 include/linux/kvm_host.h     |  3 ++
 mm/huge_memory.c             |  9 +++++
 mm/ksm.c                     |  3 ++
 mm/memory.c                  | 13 +++++++
 mm/rmap.c                    |  4 ++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c          | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 107 insertions(+)

Comments

Mike Rapoport May 26, 2020, 6:16 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:52:14PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> If the protected memory feature enabled, unmap guest memory from
> kernel's direct mappings.
> 
> Migration and KSM is disabled for protected memory as it would require a
> special treatment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c |  1 +
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h     |  3 ++
>  mm/huge_memory.c             |  9 +++++
>  mm/ksm.c                     |  3 ++
>  mm/memory.c                  | 13 +++++++
>  mm/rmap.c                    |  4 ++
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c          | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index 6f075766bb94..13988413af40 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -2227,6 +2227,7 @@ void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enable)
>  
>  	arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kernel_map_pages);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
>  bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page)
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index b6944f88033d..e1d7762b615c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -705,6 +705,9 @@ int kvm_protect_all_memory(struct kvm *kvm);
>  int kvm_protect_memory(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		       unsigned long gfn, unsigned long npages, bool protect);
>  
> +void kvm_map_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
> +void kvm_unmap_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
> +
>  int gfn_to_page_many_atomic(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
>  			    struct page **pages, int nr_pages);
>  
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index c3562648a4ef..d8a444a401cc 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>  #include <linux/numa.h>
>  #include <linux/page_owner.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>

This does not seem right... 

>  #include <asm/tlb.h>
>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> @@ -650,6 +651,10 @@ static vm_fault_t __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  		spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
>  		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_ALLOC);
>  		count_memcg_events(memcg, THP_FAULT_ALLOC, 1);
> +
> +		/* Unmap page from direct mapping */
> +		if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> +			kvm_unmap_page(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);

... and neither does this.

I think the map/unmap primitives shoud be a part of the generic mm and
not burried inside KVM.

>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1886,6 +1891,10 @@ int zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			page_remove_rmap(page, true);
>  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(page) < 0, page);
>  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page);
> +
> +			/* Map the page back to the direct mapping */
> +			if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> +				kvm_map_page(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>  		} else if (thp_migration_supported()) {
>  			swp_entry_t entry;
>  
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 281c00129a2e..942b88782ac2 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,9 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *find_mergeable_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		return NULL;
>  	if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE) || !vma->anon_vma)
>  		return NULL;
> +	/* TODO */

Probably this is not something that should be done. For a security
sensitive environment that wants protected memory, KSM woudn't be
relevant anyway...

> +	if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> +		return NULL;
>  	return vma;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index d7228db6e4bf..74773229b854 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dax.h>
>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>  #include <linux/numa.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>

The same comment as in mm/huge_memory.c. I don't think that generic mm
should depend on KVM.

>  #include <trace/events/kmem.h>
>  
> @@ -1088,6 +1089,11 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  				    likely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SEQ_READ)))
>  					mark_page_accessed(page);
>  			}
> +
> +			/* Map the page back to the direct mapping */
> +			if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) && vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> +				kvm_map_page(page, 1);
> +
>  			rss[mm_counter(page)]--;
>  			page_remove_rmap(page, false);
>  			if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) < 0))
> @@ -3312,6 +3318,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	struct page *page;
>  	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
>  	pte_t entry;
> +	bool set = false;
>  
>  	/* File mapping without ->vm_ops ? */
>  	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> @@ -3397,6 +3404,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
>  	mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
>  	lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
> +	set = true;
>  setpte:
>  	set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry);
>  
> @@ -3404,6 +3412,11 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
>  unlock:
>  	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
> +
> +	/* Unmap page from direct mapping */
> +	if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma) && set)
> +		kvm_unmap_page(page, 1);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  release:
>  	mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index f79a206b271a..a9b2e347d1ab 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1709,6 +1709,10 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  static bool invalid_migration_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg)
>  {
> +	/* TODO */
> +	if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> +		return true;
> +
>  	return vma_is_temporary_stack(vma);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 71aac117357f..defc33d3a124 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/lockdep.h>
>  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <asm/ioctl.h>
> @@ -2718,6 +2719,72 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
>  
> +void kvm_map_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* Clear page before returning it to the direct mapping */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> +		void *p = map_page_atomic(page + i);
> +		memset(p, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		unmap_page_atomic(p);
> +	}
> +
> +	kernel_map_pages(page, nr_pages, 1);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_map_page);
> +
> +void kvm_unmap_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
> +{
> +	kernel_map_pages(page, nr_pages, 0);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_unmap_page);
> +
> +static int adjust_direct_mapping_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> +					   unsigned long end,
> +					   struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +	bool protect = (bool)walk->private;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
> +		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
> +		if (is_huge_zero_page(page))
> +			return 0;
> +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(total_mapcount(page) != 1, page);
> +		/* XXX: Would it fail with direct device assignment? */
> +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 1, page);
> +		kernel_map_pages(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR, !protect);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> +	for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		pte_t entry = *pte;
> +
> +		if (!pte_present(entry))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(entry)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		page = pte_page(entry);
> +
> +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(page) != 1, page);
> +		/* XXX: Would it fail with direct device assignment? */
> +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) !=
> +			       total_mapcount(compound_head(page)), page);
> +		kernel_map_pages(page, 1, !protect);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mm_walk_ops adjust_direct_mapping_ops = {
> +	.pmd_entry	= adjust_direct_mapping_pte_range,
> +};
> +

All this seem to me an addition to set_memory APIs rather then KVM.

>  static int protect_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
>  {
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> @@ -2763,6 +2830,13 @@ static int protect_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out;
>  
> +		if (vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
> +			ret = walk_page_range_novma(mm, start, tmp,
> +					    &adjust_direct_mapping_ops, NULL,
> +					    (void *) protect);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto out;
> +		}
>  next:
>  		start = tmp;
>  		if (start < prev->vm_end)
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
>
Kirill A . Shutemov May 26, 2020, 10:10 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 09:16:38AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:52:14PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > If the protected memory feature enabled, unmap guest memory from
> > kernel's direct mappings.
> > 
> > Migration and KSM is disabled for protected memory as it would require a
> > special treatment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c |  1 +
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h     |  3 ++
> >  mm/huge_memory.c             |  9 +++++
> >  mm/ksm.c                     |  3 ++
> >  mm/memory.c                  | 13 +++++++
> >  mm/rmap.c                    |  4 ++
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c          | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> > index 6f075766bb94..13988413af40 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> > @@ -2227,6 +2227,7 @@ void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enable)
> >  
> >  	arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kernel_map_pages);
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> >  bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index b6944f88033d..e1d7762b615c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -705,6 +705,9 @@ int kvm_protect_all_memory(struct kvm *kvm);
> >  int kvm_protect_memory(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  		       unsigned long gfn, unsigned long npages, bool protect);
> >  
> > +void kvm_map_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
> > +void kvm_unmap_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
> > +
> >  int gfn_to_page_many_atomic(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> >  			    struct page **pages, int nr_pages);
> >  
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index c3562648a4ef..d8a444a401cc 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/oom.h>
> >  #include <linux/numa.h>
> >  #include <linux/page_owner.h>
> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> 
> This does not seem right... 

I agree. I try to find a more clean way to deal with it.

> >  #include <asm/tlb.h>
> >  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> > @@ -650,6 +651,10 @@ static vm_fault_t __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> >  		spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
> >  		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_ALLOC);
> >  		count_memcg_events(memcg, THP_FAULT_ALLOC, 1);
> > +
> > +		/* Unmap page from direct mapping */
> > +		if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> > +			kvm_unmap_page(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> 
> ... and neither does this.
> 
> I think the map/unmap primitives shoud be a part of the generic mm and
> not burried inside KVM.

Well, yes. Except, kvm_map_page() also clears the page before bringing it
back to direct mappings. Not sure yet how to deal with it.

> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -1886,6 +1891,10 @@ int zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >  			page_remove_rmap(page, true);
> >  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(page) < 0, page);
> >  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page);
> > +
> > +			/* Map the page back to the direct mapping */
> > +			if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
> > +				kvm_map_page(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> >  		} else if (thp_migration_supported()) {
> >  			swp_entry_t entry;
> >  
> > diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> > index 281c00129a2e..942b88782ac2 100644
> > --- a/mm/ksm.c
> > +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> > @@ -527,6 +527,9 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *find_mergeable_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE) || !vma->anon_vma)
> >  		return NULL;
> > +	/* TODO */
> 
> Probably this is not something that should be done. For a security
> sensitive environment that wants protected memory, KSM woudn't be
> relevant anyway...

Hm. True.

> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 71aac117357f..defc33d3a124 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> > +#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/processor.h>
> >  #include <asm/ioctl.h>
> > @@ -2718,6 +2719,72 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
> >  
> > +void kvm_map_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	/* Clear page before returning it to the direct mapping */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> > +		void *p = map_page_atomic(page + i);
> > +		memset(p, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +		unmap_page_atomic(p);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	kernel_map_pages(page, nr_pages, 1);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_map_page);
> > +
> > +void kvm_unmap_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
> > +{
> > +	kernel_map_pages(page, nr_pages, 0);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_unmap_page);
> > +
> > +static int adjust_direct_mapping_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> > +					   unsigned long end,
> > +					   struct mm_walk *walk)
> > +{
> > +	bool protect = (bool)walk->private;
> > +	pte_t *pte;
> > +	struct page *page;
> > +
> > +	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
> > +		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
> > +		if (is_huge_zero_page(page))
> > +			return 0;
> > +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(total_mapcount(page) != 1, page);
> > +		/* XXX: Would it fail with direct device assignment? */
> > +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 1, page);
> > +		kernel_map_pages(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR, !protect);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> > +	for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +		pte_t entry = *pte;
> > +
> > +		if (!pte_present(entry))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(entry)))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		page = pte_page(entry);
> > +
> > +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(page) != 1, page);
> > +		/* XXX: Would it fail with direct device assignment? */
> > +		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) !=
> > +			       total_mapcount(compound_head(page)), page);
> > +		kernel_map_pages(page, 1, !protect);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct mm_walk_ops adjust_direct_mapping_ops = {
> > +	.pmd_entry	= adjust_direct_mapping_pte_range,
> > +};
> > +
> 
> All this seem to me an addition to set_memory APIs rather then KVM.

Emm?.. I don't think walking userspace mapping is set_memory thing.
And kernel_map_pages() is VMM interface already.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
index 6f075766bb94..13988413af40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
@@ -2227,6 +2227,7 @@  void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int numpages, int enable)
 
 	arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kernel_map_pages);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
 bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index b6944f88033d..e1d7762b615c 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -705,6 +705,9 @@  int kvm_protect_all_memory(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_protect_memory(struct kvm *kvm,
 		       unsigned long gfn, unsigned long npages, bool protect);
 
+void kvm_map_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
+void kvm_unmap_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
+
 int gfn_to_page_many_atomic(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
 			    struct page **pages, int nr_pages);
 
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index c3562648a4ef..d8a444a401cc 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/oom.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/page_owner.h>
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -650,6 +651,10 @@  static vm_fault_t __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf,
 		spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
 		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_ALLOC);
 		count_memcg_events(memcg, THP_FAULT_ALLOC, 1);
+
+		/* Unmap page from direct mapping */
+		if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
+			kvm_unmap_page(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1886,6 +1891,10 @@  int zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			page_remove_rmap(page, true);
 			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(page) < 0, page);
 			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page);
+
+			/* Map the page back to the direct mapping */
+			if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
+				kvm_map_page(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
 		} else if (thp_migration_supported()) {
 			swp_entry_t entry;
 
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 281c00129a2e..942b88782ac2 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -527,6 +527,9 @@  static struct vm_area_struct *find_mergeable_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		return NULL;
 	if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE) || !vma->anon_vma)
 		return NULL;
+	/* TODO */
+	if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
+		return NULL;
 	return vma;
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index d7228db6e4bf..74773229b854 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/dax.h>
 #include <linux/oom.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
 #include <trace/events/kmem.h>
 
@@ -1088,6 +1089,11 @@  static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 				    likely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SEQ_READ)))
 					mark_page_accessed(page);
 			}
+
+			/* Map the page back to the direct mapping */
+			if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) && vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
+				kvm_map_page(page, 1);
+
 			rss[mm_counter(page)]--;
 			page_remove_rmap(page, false);
 			if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) < 0))
@@ -3312,6 +3318,7 @@  static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	struct page *page;
 	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
 	pte_t entry;
+	bool set = false;
 
 	/* File mapping without ->vm_ops ? */
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
@@ -3397,6 +3404,7 @@  static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 	mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
 	lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+	set = true;
 setpte:
 	set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry);
 
@@ -3404,6 +3412,11 @@  static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
 unlock:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
+
+	/* Unmap page from direct mapping */
+	if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma) && set)
+		kvm_unmap_page(page, 1);
+
 	return ret;
 release:
 	mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index f79a206b271a..a9b2e347d1ab 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1709,6 +1709,10 @@  static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 static bool invalid_migration_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg)
 {
+	/* TODO */
+	if (vma_is_kvm_protected(vma))
+		return true;
+
 	return vma_is_temporary_stack(vma);
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 71aac117357f..defc33d3a124 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
 
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/ioctl.h>
@@ -2718,6 +2719,72 @@  void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
 
+void kvm_map_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/* Clear page before returning it to the direct mapping */
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
+		void *p = map_page_atomic(page + i);
+		memset(p, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
+		unmap_page_atomic(p);
+	}
+
+	kernel_map_pages(page, nr_pages, 1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_map_page);
+
+void kvm_unmap_page(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
+{
+	kernel_map_pages(page, nr_pages, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_unmap_page);
+
+static int adjust_direct_mapping_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
+					   unsigned long end,
+					   struct mm_walk *walk)
+{
+	bool protect = (bool)walk->private;
+	pte_t *pte;
+	struct page *page;
+
+	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
+		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
+		if (is_huge_zero_page(page))
+			return 0;
+		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(total_mapcount(page) != 1, page);
+		/* XXX: Would it fail with direct device assignment? */
+		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 1, page);
+		kernel_map_pages(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR, !protect);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
+	for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+		pte_t entry = *pte;
+
+		if (!pte_present(entry))
+			continue;
+
+		if (is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(entry)))
+			continue;
+
+		page = pte_page(entry);
+
+		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapcount(page) != 1, page);
+		/* XXX: Would it fail with direct device assignment? */
+		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) !=
+			       total_mapcount(compound_head(page)), page);
+		kernel_map_pages(page, 1, !protect);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct mm_walk_ops adjust_direct_mapping_ops = {
+	.pmd_entry	= adjust_direct_mapping_pte_range,
+};
+
 static int protect_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
@@ -2763,6 +2830,13 @@  static int protect_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 
+		if (vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
+			ret = walk_page_range_novma(mm, start, tmp,
+					    &adjust_direct_mapping_ops, NULL,
+					    (void *) protect);
+			if (ret)
+				goto out;
+		}
 next:
 		start = tmp;
 		if (start < prev->vm_end)