Message ID | 20200604185239.20765-1-jtp.park@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment | expand |
On 04.06.20 20:52, Jeongtae Park wrote: > There is a typo in comment, fix it. > "nother" -> "another" > > Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com> > Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 1e94497b7388..3091c2ca60df 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr) > * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible > * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add() > * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to > - * nother cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too. > + * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too. > */ > struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred); > > fwiw Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 1e94497b7388..3091c2ca60df 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr) * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add() * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to - * nother cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too. + * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too. */ struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
There is a typo in comment, fix it. "nother" -> "another" Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)