From patchwork Fri Oct 23 12:21:50 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11853011 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA19D17E6 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5770F24248 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="URbjYqZv" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5770F24248 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BA0046B007B; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B27486B007D; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:23:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9EE436B007E; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:23:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0132.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.132]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734AA6B007B for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EED7362C for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:23:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77403104940.09.slope24_5d0a36c27259 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A5F180AD81D for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:23:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,19fe33f43a2e79e2,d41d8cd98f00b204,daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,,RULES_HIT:41:152:355:379:541:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1431:1437:1515:1516:1518:1535:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:2901:2903:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3865:3867:3871:3874:4321:5007:6117:6119:6261:6653:6742:7903:10004:10400:11026:11473:11658:11914:12043:12296:12297:12438:12517:12519:12555:12895:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:13846:13894:14096:14097:14181:14394:14659:14721:21080:21444:21451:21627:21939:21990:30012:30054:30055:30064:30090,0,RBL:209.85.128.67:@ffwll.ch:.lbl8.mailshell.net-66.201.201.201 62.8.0.100;04yrksatr4j8q76k8zmmrojncejrjopgci3af69iyo1jieyda4xx1wpwupz8ca6.hkhebehsqj36hkza8y6t7q74nff7jituttyqihwmabubz1bbqqd7cgb7bdxa34a.g-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:24,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: slope24_5d0a36c27259 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5371 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id d3so1295191wma.4 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:23:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hp7lChw6Uow+58XPniSHemIeAoNErbB/sdK6im80Iug=; b=URbjYqZvij6vMp6zpIk/3WlniapSCelkh8qPhM9XSJmSi3JP0Pkq6JfYZq+gC0V2Ja Jq8vCQ4Ho/GAm6SQXrzJhiajzuA2XAwJXKB1Cll6tMyrVwJYz4NCmG2PdfE0KkUS7bh0 l5/AnqPDLrJU4JyaIv3jCsFac60g5JtxDcFVQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hp7lChw6Uow+58XPniSHemIeAoNErbB/sdK6im80Iug=; b=OnKY9gaLHmm91lNT/5RTP1BXK9RICbtu6vDiHoW7L8UNJmZsE/Mc+cEQFSedIIKFM9 1QgurDpz6DAFNLYZIS95uxvgRsvXsR+ZORw0bJkNMQ8xcgazw9Km2ChQtA52p28WRgDL SC36eGeznzGs1T0nyytyWXcx8mPHr6N3dvpdSLKHZQjd9Zr5khdh9n4rMW6YFElzzO5f O+N/uHPXYW4GFFAQ+fIGWlzEYF8sbEOMROWRU47UW7BcRFTfy0B3hQEf/ItSNuj5Hh9b bZcedziqW1PXLipXzO2ebu8bc9YFp6SK3gQmTs+UpyZOCbl0KVnMQXFDrxnKrSlrvS0/ Q54g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533p4ffmxlWF4ojuxlsF0ulh8F4bw78GKwGG6TvPfoQ1LwCidCJn saOK6ARiXqDd8nayqAX3Urs9Vw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqZWBmXRQ8vY8ZKJrjdPXGP2WILf15a1TrVl8Pgis8iT7Odd2hX51Nk7fKP5ClvyukHiQ2vg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4d05:: with SMTP id o5mr1994877wmh.94.1603455788583; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm3056484wrp.74.2020.10.23.05.23.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:23:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development Cc: Intel Graphics Development , Daniel Vetter , Daniel Vetter , Jason Gunthorpe , Kees Cook , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jan Kara , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , Cornelia Huck , kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 39/65] vfio/type1: Mark follow_pfn as unsafe Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:21:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20201023122216.2373294-39-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201021163242.1458885-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: The code seems to stuff these pfns into iommu pts (or something like that, I didn't follow), but there's no mmu_notifier to ensure that access is synchronized with pte updates. Hence mark these as unsafe. This means that with CONFIG_STRICT_FOLLOW_PFN, these will be rejected. Real fix is to wire up an mmu_notifier ... somehow. Probably means any invalidate is a fatal fault for this vfio device, but then this shouldn't ever happen if userspace is reasonable. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Jérôme Glisse Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Dan Williams Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: Cornelia Huck Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c index 5fbf0c1f7433..a4d53f3d0a35 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm, { int ret; - ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); + ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); if (ret) { bool unlocked = false; @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm, if (ret) return ret; - ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); + ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); } return ret;