Message ID | 20210121230621.654304-9-shy828301@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware | expand |
On 22.01.2021 02:06, Yang Shi wrote: > Use per memcg's nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers. The shrinker's nr_deferred > will be used in the following cases: > 1. Non memcg aware shrinkers > 2. !CONFIG_MEMCG > 3. memcg is disabled by boot parameter > > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 722aa71b13b2..d8e77ea13815 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -359,6 +359,27 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) > up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > } > > +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > +{ > + struct shrinker_info *info; > + > + info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, > + true); Since now these rcu_dereference_protected() are in separate functions and there is no taking a lock near them, it seems it would be better to underling the desired lock with rcu_dereference_protected(, lockdep_assert_held(lock_you_need_here_locked)); > + return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0); > +} > + > +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > +{ > + struct shrinker_info *info; > + > + info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, > + true); > + > + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]); > +} > + > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc) > { > return sc->target_mem_cgroup; > @@ -397,6 +418,18 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) > { > } > > +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc) > { > return false; > @@ -408,6 +441,39 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc) > } > #endif > > +static long count_nr_deferred(struct shrinker *shrinker, > + struct shrink_control *sc) > +{ > + int nid = sc->nid; > + > + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) > + nid = 0; > + > + if (sc->memcg && > + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)) > + return count_nr_deferred_memcg(nid, shrinker, > + sc->memcg); > + > + return atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0); > +} > + > + > +static long set_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker *shrinker, > + struct shrink_control *sc) > +{ > + int nid = sc->nid; > + > + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) > + nid = 0; > + > + if (sc->memcg && > + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)) > + return set_nr_deferred_memcg(nr, nid, shrinker, > + sc->memcg); > + > + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > +} > + > /* > * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters. > * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is > @@ -544,14 +610,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, > long freeable; > long nr; > long new_nr; > - int nid = shrinkctl->nid; > long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch > : SHRINK_BATCH; > long scanned = 0, next_deferred; > > - if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) > - nid = 0; > - > freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl); > if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY) > return freeable; > @@ -561,7 +623,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, > * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations > * don't also do this scanning work. > */ > - nr = atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0); > + nr = count_nr_deferred(shrinker, shrinkctl); > > total_scan = nr; > if (shrinker->seeks) { > @@ -652,14 +714,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, > next_deferred = 0; > /* > * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a > - * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the > - * scan, there is no need to do an update. > + * manner that handles concurrent updates. > */ > - if (next_deferred > 0) > - new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred, > - &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > - else > - new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > + new_nr = set_nr_deferred(next_deferred, shrinker, shrinkctl); > > trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan); > return freed; >
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:35 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > > On 22.01.2021 02:06, Yang Shi wrote: > > Use per memcg's nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers. The shrinker's nr_deferred > > will be used in the following cases: > > 1. Non memcg aware shrinkers > > 2. !CONFIG_MEMCG > > 3. memcg is disabled by boot parameter > > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> > > --- > > mm/vmscan.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > > index 722aa71b13b2..d8e77ea13815 100644 > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -359,6 +359,27 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) > > up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > > } > > > > +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > +{ > > + struct shrinker_info *info; > > + > > + info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, > > + true); > > Since now these rcu_dereference_protected() are in separate functions and there is > no taking a lock near them, it seems it would be better to underling the desired > lock with rcu_dereference_protected(, lockdep_assert_held(lock_you_need_here_locked)); Sure. Will incorporate in v5. BTW I noticed using lockdep_assert_held() in the parameter of the functions will result in compilation failure with gcc 10.0.1 (shipped with Fedora 32), but fine with gcc 8.3.1. In file included from ./include/linux/rbtree.h:22, from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:10, from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:21, from ./include/linux/gfp.h:6, from ./include/linux/mm.h:10, from mm/vmscan.c:15: mm/vmscan.c: In function ‘shrinker_info_protected’: ./include/linux/lockdep.h:386:34: error: expected expression before ‘do’ 386 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) | ^~ ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:337:52: note: in definition of macro ‘RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN’ 337 | #define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0 && (c)) | ^ ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:554:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__rcu_dereference_protected’ 554 | __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vmscan.c:389:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_dereference_protected’ 389 | return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vmscan.c:390:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘lockdep_assert_held’ 390 | lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I didn't dig into the root cause. Just use lockdep_is_held() instead of lockdep_assert_held(). > > > > + return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0); > > +} > > + > > +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > +{ > > + struct shrinker_info *info; > > + > > + info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, > > + true); > > + > > + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]); > > +} > > + > > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc) > > { > > return sc->target_mem_cgroup; > > @@ -397,6 +418,18 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) > > { > > } > > > > +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc) > > { > > return false; > > @@ -408,6 +441,39 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc) > > } > > #endif > > > > +static long count_nr_deferred(struct shrinker *shrinker, > > + struct shrink_control *sc) > > +{ > > + int nid = sc->nid; > > + > > + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) > > + nid = 0; > > + > > + if (sc->memcg && > > + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)) > > + return count_nr_deferred_memcg(nid, shrinker, > > + sc->memcg); > > + > > + return atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0); > > +} > > + > > + > > +static long set_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker *shrinker, > > + struct shrink_control *sc) > > +{ > > + int nid = sc->nid; > > + > > + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) > > + nid = 0; > > + > > + if (sc->memcg && > > + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)) > > + return set_nr_deferred_memcg(nr, nid, shrinker, > > + sc->memcg); > > + > > + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > > +} > > + > > /* > > * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters. > > * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is > > @@ -544,14 +610,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, > > long freeable; > > long nr; > > long new_nr; > > - int nid = shrinkctl->nid; > > long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch > > : SHRINK_BATCH; > > long scanned = 0, next_deferred; > > > > - if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) > > - nid = 0; > > - > > freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl); > > if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY) > > return freeable; > > @@ -561,7 +623,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, > > * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations > > * don't also do this scanning work. > > */ > > - nr = atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0); > > + nr = count_nr_deferred(shrinker, shrinkctl); > > > > total_scan = nr; > > if (shrinker->seeks) { > > @@ -652,14 +714,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, > > next_deferred = 0; > > /* > > * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a > > - * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the > > - * scan, there is no need to do an update. > > + * manner that handles concurrent updates. > > */ > > - if (next_deferred > 0) > > - new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred, > > - &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > > - else > > - new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > > + new_nr = set_nr_deferred(next_deferred, shrinker, shrinkctl); > > > > trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan); > > return freed; > > > >
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 722aa71b13b2..d8e77ea13815 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -359,6 +359,27 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); } +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct shrinker_info *info; + + info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, + true); + return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0); +} + +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct shrinker_info *info; + + info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, + true); + + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]); +} + static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc) { return sc->target_mem_cgroup; @@ -397,6 +418,18 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) { } +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + return 0; +} + +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + return 0; +} + static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc) { return false; @@ -408,6 +441,39 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc) } #endif +static long count_nr_deferred(struct shrinker *shrinker, + struct shrink_control *sc) +{ + int nid = sc->nid; + + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) + nid = 0; + + if (sc->memcg && + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)) + return count_nr_deferred_memcg(nid, shrinker, + sc->memcg); + + return atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0); +} + + +static long set_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker *shrinker, + struct shrink_control *sc) +{ + int nid = sc->nid; + + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) + nid = 0; + + if (sc->memcg && + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)) + return set_nr_deferred_memcg(nr, nid, shrinker, + sc->memcg); + + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); +} + /* * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters. * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is @@ -544,14 +610,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, long freeable; long nr; long new_nr; - int nid = shrinkctl->nid; long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch : SHRINK_BATCH; long scanned = 0, next_deferred; - if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) - nid = 0; - freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl); if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY) return freeable; @@ -561,7 +623,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations * don't also do this scanning work. */ - nr = atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0); + nr = count_nr_deferred(shrinker, shrinkctl); total_scan = nr; if (shrinker->seeks) { @@ -652,14 +714,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, next_deferred = 0; /* * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a - * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the - * scan, there is no need to do an update. + * manner that handles concurrent updates. */ - if (next_deferred > 0) - new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred, - &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); - else - new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); + new_nr = set_nr_deferred(next_deferred, shrinker, shrinkctl); trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan); return freed;
Use per memcg's nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers. The shrinker's nr_deferred will be used in the following cases: 1. Non memcg aware shrinkers 2. !CONFIG_MEMCG 3. memcg is disabled by boot parameter Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> --- mm/vmscan.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)