diff mbox series

[10/16] dma-mapping: Add flags to dma_map_ops to indicate PCI P2PDMA support

Message ID 20210408170123.8788-11-logang@deltatee.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add new DMA mapping operation for P2PDMA | expand

Commit Message

Logan Gunthorpe April 8, 2021, 5:01 p.m. UTC
Add a flags member to the dma_map_ops structure with one flag to
indicate support for PCI P2PDMA.

Also, add a helper to check if a device supports PCI P2PDMA.

Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
 include/linux/dma-map-ops.h |  3 +++
 include/linux/dma-mapping.h |  5 +++++
 kernel/dma/mapping.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

Comments

John Hubbard May 3, 2021, 12:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On 4/8/21 10:01 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Add a flags member to the dma_map_ops structure with one flag to
> indicate support for PCI P2PDMA.
> 
> Also, add a helper to check if a device supports PCI P2PDMA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/dma-map-ops.h |  3 +++
>   include/linux/dma-mapping.h |  5 +++++
>   kernel/dma/mapping.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> index 51872e736e7b..481892822104 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>   struct cma;
>   
>   struct dma_map_ops {
> +	unsigned int flags;
> +#define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)
> +

Can we move this up and out of the struct member area, so that it looks
more like this:

/*
  * Values for struct dma_map_ops.flags:
  *
  * DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED: <documentation here...this is a good place to
  * explain exactly what this flag is for.>
  */
#define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)

struct dma_map_ops {
	unsigned int flags;


>   	void *(*alloc)(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp,
>   			unsigned long attrs);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index 50b8f586cf59..c31980ecca62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ int dma_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   		unsigned long attrs);
>   bool dma_can_mmap(struct device *dev);
>   int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
> +bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev);
>   int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>   int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>   u64 dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev);
> @@ -247,6 +248,10 @@ static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   {
>   	return 0;
>   }
> +static inline bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;

Should be:
	
	return false;

> +}
>   static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   {
>   	return -EIO;
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> index 923089c4267b..ce44a0fcc4e5 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> @@ -573,6 +573,24 @@ int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
>   
> +bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> +
> +	/* if ops is not set, dma direct will be used which supports P2PDMA */
> +	if (!ops)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: dma_ops_bypass is not checked here because P2PDMA should
> +	 * not be used with dma mapping ops that do not have support even
> +	 * if the specific device is bypassing them.
> +	 */
> +
> +	return ops->flags & DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED;

Wow, rather unusual combination of things in order decide this. It feels
a bit over-complicated to have flags and ops and a bool function all
dealing with the same 1-bit answer, but there is no caller shown here,
so I'll have to come back to this after reviewing subsequent patches.

thanks,
Logan Gunthorpe May 3, 2021, 5:09 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2021-05-02 6:32 p.m., John Hubbard wrote:
> On 4/8/21 10:01 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Add a flags member to the dma_map_ops structure with one flag to
>> indicate support for PCI P2PDMA.
>>
>> Also, add a helper to check if a device supports PCI P2PDMA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/dma-map-ops.h |  3 +++
>>   include/linux/dma-mapping.h |  5 +++++
>>   kernel/dma/mapping.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> index 51872e736e7b..481892822104 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>>   struct cma;
>>   
>>   struct dma_map_ops {
>> +	unsigned int flags;
>> +#define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)
>> +
> 
> Can we move this up and out of the struct member area, so that it looks
> more like this:
> 
> /*
>   * Values for struct dma_map_ops.flags:
>   *
>   * DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED: <documentation here...this is a good place to
>   * explain exactly what this flag is for.>
>   */
> #define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)
> 
> struct dma_map_ops {
> 	unsigned int flags;
> 

Sure, I don't care that much. I was just following the style in nvme.h.

>>   	void *(*alloc)(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>>   			dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp,
>>   			unsigned long attrs);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>> index 50b8f586cf59..c31980ecca62 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ int dma_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>   		unsigned long attrs);
>>   bool dma_can_mmap(struct device *dev);
>>   int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>> +bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev);
>>   int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>>   int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>>   u64 dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev);
>> @@ -247,6 +248,10 @@ static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>>   {
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> +static inline bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
> 
> Should be:
> 	
> 	return false;

Yup, will fix.

>> +}
>>   static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>>   {
>>   	return -EIO;
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
>> index 923089c4267b..ce44a0fcc4e5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
>> @@ -573,6 +573,24 @@ int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
>>   
>> +bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>> +
>> +	/* if ops is not set, dma direct will be used which supports P2PDMA */
>> +	if (!ops)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Note: dma_ops_bypass is not checked here because P2PDMA should
>> +	 * not be used with dma mapping ops that do not have support even
>> +	 * if the specific device is bypassing them.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	return ops->flags & DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED;
> 
> Wow, rather unusual combination of things in order decide this. It feels
> a bit over-complicated to have flags and ops and a bool function all
> dealing with the same 1-bit answer, but there is no caller shown here,
> so I'll have to come back to this after reviewing subsequent patches.

Yeah, I originally had it much simpler, but it confused Ira and it was
clear it had to be written more explicitly and commented better.

Logan
Don Dutile May 11, 2021, 4:06 p.m. UTC | #3
On 4/8/21 1:01 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Add a flags member to the dma_map_ops structure with one flag to
> indicate support for PCI P2PDMA.
>
> Also, add a helper to check if a device supports PCI P2PDMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/dma-map-ops.h |  3 +++
>   include/linux/dma-mapping.h |  5 +++++
>   kernel/dma/mapping.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> index 51872e736e7b..481892822104 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>   struct cma;
>   
>   struct dma_map_ops {
> +	unsigned int flags;
> +#define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)
> +
I'm not a fan of in-line define's; if we're going to add a flags field to the dma-ops
-- and logically it'd be good to have p2pdma go through the dma-ops struct --
then let's move this up in front of the dma-ops description.

And now that the dma-ops struct is being 'opened' for p2pdma, should p2pdma ops be added
to this struct, so all this work can be mimic'd/reflected/leveraged/refactored for CXL, GenZ, etc. p2pdma in (the near?) future?

>   	void *(*alloc)(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp,
>   			unsigned long attrs);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index 50b8f586cf59..c31980ecca62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ int dma_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   		unsigned long attrs);
>   bool dma_can_mmap(struct device *dev);
>   int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
> +bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev);
>   int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>   int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>   u64 dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev);
> @@ -247,6 +248,10 @@ static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   {
>   	return 0;
>   }
> +static inline bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>   static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   {
>   	return -EIO;
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> index 923089c4267b..ce44a0fcc4e5 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> @@ -573,6 +573,24 @@ int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
>   
> +bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> +
> +	/* if ops is not set, dma direct will be used which supports P2PDMA */
> +	if (!ops)
> +		return true;
So, this means one cannot have p2pdma with IOMMU's? ...
-- or is this 'for now' and this may change?  if it may change, add a note here.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: dma_ops_bypass is not checked here because P2PDMA should
> +	 * not be used with dma mapping ops that do not have support even
> +	 * if the specific device is bypassing them.
> +	 */
> +
> +	return ops->flags & DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED;
that's a bool?

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_pci_p2pdma_supported);
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK
>   void arch_dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
>   #else
Logan Gunthorpe May 11, 2021, 4:19 p.m. UTC | #4
On 2021-05-11 10:06 a.m., Don Dutile wrote:
> On 4/8/21 1:01 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Add a flags member to the dma_map_ops structure with one flag to
>> indicate support for PCI P2PDMA.
>>
>> Also, add a helper to check if a device supports PCI P2PDMA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/dma-map-ops.h |  3 +++
>>   include/linux/dma-mapping.h |  5 +++++
>>   kernel/dma/mapping.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> index 51872e736e7b..481892822104 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>>   struct cma;
>>   
>>   struct dma_map_ops {
>> +	unsigned int flags;
>> +#define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)
>> +
> I'm not a fan of in-line define's; if we're going to add a flags field to the dma-ops
> -- and logically it'd be good to have p2pdma go through the dma-ops struct --
> then let's move this up in front of the dma-ops description.

Already changed for v2.

> And now that the dma-ops struct is being 'opened' for p2pdma, should p2pdma ops be added
> to this struct, so all this work can be mimic'd/reflected/leveraged/refactored for CXL, GenZ, etc. p2pdma in (the near?) future?

v2 no longer has a specific op for p2pdma. We are now using
dma_map_sgtable() which already has the error return we need.

I think any work to support CXL, GenZ, etc will need to be done when
they add their own support. I can't and shouldn't guess at their needs now.

Logan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
index 51872e736e7b..481892822104 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ 
 struct cma;
 
 struct dma_map_ops {
+	unsigned int flags;
+#define DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED     (1 << 0)
+
 	void *(*alloc)(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 			dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t gfp,
 			unsigned long attrs);
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index 50b8f586cf59..c31980ecca62 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@  int dma_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		unsigned long attrs);
 bool dma_can_mmap(struct device *dev);
 int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
+bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev);
 int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
 int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
 u64 dma_get_required_mask(struct device *dev);
@@ -247,6 +248,10 @@  static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
 {
 	return -EIO;
diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
index 923089c4267b..ce44a0fcc4e5 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
@@ -573,6 +573,24 @@  int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
 
+bool dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
+{
+	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
+
+	/* if ops is not set, dma direct will be used which supports P2PDMA */
+	if (!ops)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * Note: dma_ops_bypass is not checked here because P2PDMA should
+	 * not be used with dma mapping ops that do not have support even
+	 * if the specific device is bypassing them.
+	 */
+
+	return ops->flags & DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_pci_p2pdma_supported);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK
 void arch_dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
 #else