From patchwork Wed Jul 14 22:20:55 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 12377945 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195B1C1B08C for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 22:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5A1613C5 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 22:21:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BF5A1613C5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D26F36B00AD; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:21:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C8A2A6B00AE; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:21:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B2A076B00AF; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:21:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0106.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.106]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE986B00AD for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:21:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CF418464D1D for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 22:21:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78362615940.26.0AED6A4 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295DAD0000B8 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 22:21:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1626301289; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y0JmFuDDelZXYWv/E+BZRvjlS5kkw3E6CXCgFUA2NEY=; b=aZwSWU6GsWpXyx6SJM21OBJD10SvZ77P6LKhm+/2HKI07q69Nrw+bsnnDGSaGhzq9f8u7K dTWFUl0dtXo+03hG9iXdptpj/gfOqg4PvLcwsoMCCp2KY0/ePuoLbwC59A3X3TKkkiGA/B HuOGapPXiqB9tKTS4IGAbudXCqs5x8E= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-447-uC6jtfvxN8-ahIg_6LHCWg-1; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:21:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: uC6jtfvxN8-ahIg_6LHCWg-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b6-20020a05622a0206b029025eb726dd9bso385176qtx.8 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:21:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y0JmFuDDelZXYWv/E+BZRvjlS5kkw3E6CXCgFUA2NEY=; b=ehVBA9o75nviUvvUP96yv9BnIw7zDD4n3QYHC40Yid99fkDFZQIPNmjeEPBDNLj7JT S/AmsgDGjQaHtlfPA5z2/Ds4LEaW+39kkuloqYd0JTZ4ZBa6rCzTQh3rVjNxqoR3BFdM 6U2LxCySMDOF6TwtUlLfQstakdVvh/CGtivEgisXFeQbVGwv9mTA3IOvZU8k0r1z41AR 2dFbtMwvvS6f03FSt4wNLI3OhE8hDqGLjQFwZziOtcvNECmYq+dmtrSI6MlKgXps+hxR HeANOMbQPgCbUIkEJP5tZ/UiT1v6cEY94Oenidf9Q+sUgVMYfRfu6GqXMrAnMtZaSDPH NwuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Akmmjf512GtzbLv6S/Fap3PQFzWqzvxArhE/KAfHa/FS/Gxup 8rjFhlezvvGSuN581l8IwjWaMhpnG35QPQCpRlYvyxREypmyKX9cPGq45OLxqUUivf8DRFDL/uc Zw6jw6NkaBrM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1987:: with SMTP id u7mr308284qtc.45.1626301287970; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8a60fJ/Iga9Wm6qTFCnF80A2iIi32agCJqRunS6d3XLWes8fPNIWRySZtcDQS5RPr3NCouw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1987:: with SMTP id u7mr308258qtc.45.1626301287734; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (bras-base-toroon474qw-grc-65-184-144-111-238.dsl.bell.ca. [184.144.111.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b25sm1625854qka.123.2021.07.14.15.21.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Xu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , peterx@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , Axel Rasmussen , Nadav Amit , Jerome Glisse , Mike Rapoport , Miaohe Lin , Hugh Dickins , Alistair Popple , Andrea Arcangeli , Mike Kravetz , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , David Hildenbrand Subject: [PATCH v4 04/26] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:20:55 -0400 Message-Id: <20210714222117.47648-5-peterx@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210714222117.47648-1-peterx@redhat.com> References: <20210714222117.47648-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Authentication-Results: imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=aZwSWU6G; spf=none (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of peterx@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 216.205.24.124) smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Stat-Signature: mwyk7docpomg96348emstatujam5qeph X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 295DAD0000B8 X-HE-Tag: 1626301290-502903 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: This patch introduces a very special swap-like pte for file-backed memories. Currently it's only defined for x86_64 only, but as long as any arch that can properly define the UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL value as requested, it should conceptually work too. We will use this special pte to arm the ptes that got either unmapped or swapped out for a file-backed region that was previously wr-protected. This special pte could trigger a page fault just like swap entries, and as long as the page fault will satisfy pte_none()==false && pte_present()==false. Then we can revive the special pte into a normal pte backed by the page cache. This idea is greatly inspired by Hugh and Andrea in the discussion, which is referenced in the links below. The other idea (from Hugh) is that we use swp_type==1 and swp_offset=0 as the special pte. The current solution (as pointed out by Andrea) is slightly preferred in that we don't even need swp_entry_t knowledge at all in trapping these accesses. Meanwhile, we also reuse _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP from the anonymous swp entries. This patch only introduces the special pte and its operators. It's not yet applied to have any functional difference. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201126222359.8120-1-peterx@redhat.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201130230603.46187-1-peterx@redhat.com/ Suggested-by: Andrea Arcangeli Suggested-by: Hugh Dickins Signed-off-by: Peter Xu --- arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h | 3 +++ include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h index 448cd01eb3ec..71b1e73d5b26 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -1300,6 +1300,34 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_swp_clear_soft_dirty(pmd_t pmd) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP + +/* + * This is a very special swap-like pte that marks this pte as "wr-protected" + * by userfaultfd-wp. It should only exist for file-backed memory where the + * page (previously got wr-protected) has been unmapped or swapped out. + * + * For anonymous memories, the userfaultfd-wp _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP bit is kept + * along with a real swp entry instead. + * + * Let's make some rules for this special pte: + * + * (1) pte_none()==false, so that it'll not trigger a missing page fault. + * + * (2) pte_present()==false, so that it's recognized as swap (is_swap_pte). + * + * (3) pte_swp_uffd_wp()==true, so it can be tested just like a swap pte that + * contains a valid swap entry, so that we can check a swap pte always + * using "is_swap_pte() && pte_swp_uffd_wp()" without caring about whether + * there's one swap entry inside of the pte. + * + * (4) It should not be a valid swap pte anywhere, so that when we see this pte + * we know it does not contain a swap entry. + * + * For x86, the simplest special pte which satisfies all of above should be the + * pte with only _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP bit set (where swp_type==swp_offset==0). + */ +#define UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL __pte(_PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP) + static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte) { return pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_SWP_UFFD_WP); diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h index 828966d4c281..95e9811ce9d1 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ #define _ASM_GENERIC_PGTABLE_UFFD_H #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP + +#define UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL __pte(0) + static __always_inline int pte_uffd_wp(pte_t pte) { return 0; diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h index 331d2ccf0bcc..bb5a72a2b07a 100644 --- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h +++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h @@ -145,6 +145,21 @@ extern int userfaultfd_unmap_prep(struct vm_area_struct *vma, extern void userfaultfd_unmap_complete(struct mm_struct *mm, struct list_head *uf); +static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(vma_is_anonymous(vma)); + return UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL; +} + +static inline bool pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte_t pte) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP + return pte_same(pte, UFFD_WP_SWP_PTE_SPECIAL); +#else + return false; +#endif +} + #else /* CONFIG_USERFAULTFD */ /* mm helpers */ @@ -234,6 +249,16 @@ static inline void userfaultfd_unmap_complete(struct mm_struct *mm, { } +static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + return __pte(0); +} + +static inline bool pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte_t pte) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_USERFAULTFD */ #endif /* _LINUX_USERFAULTFD_K_H */