From patchwork Mon Aug 9 09:37:48 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kefeng Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 12426047 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9658BC4320A for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E1C610A1 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:32:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 43E1C610A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F38C98D000A; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E98EC8D0003; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:32:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BB3026B007D; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:32:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0225.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.225]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1C56B007B for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457D31F36F for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:32:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78455026902.25.5B1DB8A Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673D46022E29 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GjrNv5rTZz85Yj; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:28:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:32:27 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain.localdomain (10.175.113.25) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:32:26 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang To: , , , , , , CC: , , , Kefeng Wang Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] vmalloc: Choose a better start address in vm_area_register_early() Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:37:48 +0800 Message-ID: <20210809093750.131091-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210809093750.131091-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> References: <20210809093750.131091-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.25] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 673D46022E29 Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com X-Stat-Signature: pje7kkmmhj9ba5r37qqi9n3n53jbs91c X-HE-Tag: 1628501550-499368 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: There are some fixed locations in the vmalloc area be reserved in ARM(see iotable_init()) and ARM64(see map_kernel()), but for pcpu_page_first_chunk(), it calls vm_area_register_early() and choose VMALLOC_START as the start address of vmap area which could be conflicted with above address, then could trigger a BUG_ON in vm_area_add_early(). Let's choose the end of existing address range in vmlist as the start address instead of VMALLOC_START to avoid the BUG_ON. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang --- mm/vmalloc.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index d5cd52805149..1e8fe08725b8 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2238,11 +2238,17 @@ void __init vm_area_add_early(struct vm_struct *vm) */ void __init vm_area_register_early(struct vm_struct *vm, size_t align) { - static size_t vm_init_off __initdata; - unsigned long addr; - - addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START + vm_init_off, align); - vm_init_off = PFN_ALIGN(addr + vm->size) - VMALLOC_START; + struct vm_struct *head = vmlist, *curr, *next; + unsigned long addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START, align); + + while (head != NULL) { + next = head->next; + curr = head; + head = next; + addr = ALIGN((unsigned long)curr->addr + curr->size, align); + if (next && (unsigned long)next->addr - addr > vm->size) + break; + } vm->addr = (void *)addr;