@@ -1718,6 +1718,8 @@ extern void user_shm_unlock(size_t, struct ucounts *);
/* Whether to check page->mapping when zapping */
#define ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING BIT(0)
+/* Whether to skip zapping swap entries */
+#define ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP BIT(1)
/*
* Parameter block passed down to zap_pte_range in exceptional cases.
@@ -1741,6 +1743,16 @@ zap_skip_check_mapping(struct zap_details *details, struct page *page)
return details->zap_mapping != page_rmapping(page);
}
+/* Return true if skip swap entries, false otherwise */
+static inline bool
+zap_skip_swap(struct zap_details *details)
+{
+ if (!details)
+ return false;
+
+ return details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP;
+}
+
struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
pte_t pte);
struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
@@ -1379,8 +1379,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
continue;
}
- /* If details->check_mapping, we leave swap entries. */
- if (unlikely(details))
+ if (unlikely(zap_skip_swap(details)))
continue;
if (!non_swap_entry(entry))
@@ -3379,7 +3378,10 @@ void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows)
{
pgoff_t first_index = start, last_index = start + nr - 1;
- struct zap_details details = { .zap_mapping = mapping };
+ struct zap_details details = {
+ .zap_mapping = mapping,
+ .zap_flags = ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP,
+ };
if (!even_cows)
details.zap_flags |= ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING;
Firstly, the comment in zap_pte_range() is misleading because it checks against details rather than check_mappings, so it's against what the code did. Meanwhile, it's confusing too on not explaining why passing in the details pointer would mean to skip all swap entries. New user of zap_details could very possibly miss this fact if they don't read deep until zap_pte_range() because there's no comment at zap_details talking about it at all, so swap entries could be errornously skipped without being noticed. This partly reverts 3e8715fdc03e ("mm: drop zap_details::check_swap_entries"), but introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP flag, which means the opposite of previous "details" parameter: the caller should explicitly set this to skip swap entries, otherwise swap entries will always be considered (which is still the major case here). Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> --- include/linux/mm.h | 12 ++++++++++++ mm/memory.c | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)