diff mbox series

[v3,1/1] mm: Fix the uninitialized use in overcommit_policy_handler

Message ID 20210923020524.13289-1-chenjun102@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [v3,1/1] mm: Fix the uninitialized use in overcommit_policy_handler | expand

Commit Message

Chen Jun Sept. 23, 2021, 2:05 a.m. UTC
An unexpected value of /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory we will get,
after running the following program.

int main()
{
    int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory", O_RDWR)
    write(fd, "1", 1);
    write(fd, "2", 1);
    close(fd);
}

write(fd, "2", 1) will pass *ppos = 1 to proc_dointvec_minmax.
proc_dointvec_minmax will return 0 without setting new_policy.

t.data = &new_policy;
ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos)
      -->do_proc_dointvec
         -->__do_proc_dointvec
              if (write) {
                if (proc_first_pos_non_zero_ignore(ppos, table))
                  goto out;

sysctl_overcommit_memory = new_policy;

so sysctl_overcommit_memory will be set to an uninitialized value.

Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax.

Fixes: 56f3547bfa4d ("mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy"
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>

---

v3:
  * Correct commit message.

v2:
  * Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax.

 mm/util.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Morton Sept. 24, 2021, 2:23 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:05:24 +0000 Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> wrote:

> An unexpected value of /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory we will get,
> after running the following program.
> 
> int main()
> {
>     int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory", O_RDWR)
>     write(fd, "1", 1);
>     write(fd, "2", 1);
>     close(fd);
> }
> 
> write(fd, "2", 1) will pass *ppos = 1 to proc_dointvec_minmax.
> proc_dointvec_minmax will return 0 without setting new_policy.
> 
> t.data = &new_policy;
> ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos)
>       -->do_proc_dointvec
>          -->__do_proc_dointvec
>               if (write) {
>                 if (proc_first_pos_non_zero_ignore(ppos, table))
>                   goto out;
> 
> sysctl_overcommit_memory = new_policy;
> 
> so sysctl_overcommit_memory will be set to an uninitialized value.
> 
> Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax.
> 

Thanks.  I added a cc:stable to this, so the fix will be backported
into earlier kernels.
Kefeng Wang Sept. 24, 2021, 2:41 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2021/9/24 10:23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:05:24 +0000 Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> An unexpected value of /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory we will get,
>> after running the following program.
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>      int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory", O_RDWR)

Hi Andrew,

missing  ';' here,

> Thanks.  I added a cc:stable to this, so the fix will be backported
> into earlier kernels.

...  and the Fixes tag miss a ')' in the end ,  please help to add them :)

Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 4ddb6e186dd5..d5be67771850 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@  int overcommit_policy_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
 		size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct ctl_table t;
-	int new_policy;
+	int new_policy = -1;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@  int overcommit_policy_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
 		t = *table;
 		t.data = &new_policy;
 		ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret || new_policy == -1)
 			return ret;
 
 		mm_compute_batch(new_policy);