Message ID | 20211001174947.135123-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/mempolicy: do not allow illegal MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING | MPOL_LOCAL in mbind() | expand |
Hi Eric, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on hnaz-mm/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/mm-mempolicy-do-not-allow-illegal-MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING-MPOL_LOCAL-in-mbind/20211002-015054 base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master config: ia64-defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/fe87354835a4bf5cad6d885f0ba558c767fee6f1 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Eric-Dumazet/mm-mempolicy-do-not-allow-illegal-MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING-MPOL_LOCAL-in-mbind/20211002-015054 git checkout fe87354835a4bf5cad6d885f0ba558c767fee6f1 # save the attached .config to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'sanitize_mpol_flags': >> mm/mempolicy.c:1452:26: warning: comparison between pointer and integer 1452 | if (mode != MPOL_BIND) | ^~ vim +1452 mm/mempolicy.c 1440 1441 /* Basic parameter sanity check used by both mbind() and set_mempolicy() */ 1442 static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags) 1443 { 1444 *flags = *mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; 1445 *mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; 1446 1447 if ((unsigned int)(*mode) >= MPOL_MAX) 1448 return -EINVAL; 1449 if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) 1450 return -EINVAL; 1451 if (*flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) { > 1452 if (mode != MPOL_BIND) 1453 return -EINVAL; 1454 *flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON); 1455 } 1456 return 0; 1457 } 1458 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:25 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on hnaz-mm/master] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/mm-mempolicy-do-not-allow-illegal-MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING-MPOL_LOCAL-in-mbind/20211002-015054 > base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master > config: ia64-defconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/fe87354835a4bf5cad6d885f0ba558c767fee6f1 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Eric-Dumazet/mm-mempolicy-do-not-allow-illegal-MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING-MPOL_LOCAL-in-mbind/20211002-015054 > git checkout fe87354835a4bf5cad6d885f0ba558c767fee6f1 > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > mkdir build_dir > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'sanitize_mpol_flags': > >> mm/mempolicy.c:1452:26: warning: comparison between pointer and integer > 1452 | if (mode != MPOL_BIND) > | ^~ Oh well, last minute changes, and indeed my compiler warned me while I was away :/ mm/mempolicy.c:1452:12: warning: comparison between pointer and integer ('int *' and 'int') [-Wpointer-integer-compare] if (mode != MPOL_BIND) ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~ I am sending a v2, thanks. > > > vim +1452 mm/mempolicy.c > > 1440 > 1441 /* Basic parameter sanity check used by both mbind() and set_mempolicy() */ > 1442 static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags) > 1443 { > 1444 *flags = *mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > 1445 *mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > 1446 > 1447 if ((unsigned int)(*mode) >= MPOL_MAX) > 1448 return -EINVAL; > 1449 if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) > 1450 return -EINVAL; > 1451 if (*flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) { > > 1452 if (mode != MPOL_BIND) > 1453 return -EINVAL; > 1454 *flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON); > 1455 } > 1456 return 0; > 1457 } > 1458 > > --- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 1:49 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > > syzbot reported access to unitialized memory in mbind() [1] > > Issue came with commit bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on > fault among multiple bound nodes") > > This commit added a new bit in MPOL_MODE_FLAGS, but only checked > valid combination (MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING can only be used with MPOL_BIND) > in do_set_mempolicy() > > This patch moves the check in sanitize_mpol_flags() so that it > is also used by mbind() > > [1] > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > mpol_equal include/linux/mempolicy.h:105 [inline] > vma_merge+0x4a1/0x1e60 mm/mmap.c:1190 > mbind_range+0xcc8/0x1e80 mm/mempolicy.c:811 > do_mbind+0xf42/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1333 > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > Uninit was created at: > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3221 [inline] > slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3230 [inline] > kmem_cache_alloc+0x751/0xff0 mm/slub.c:3235 > mpol_new mm/mempolicy.c:293 [inline] > do_mbind+0x912/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1289 > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > ===================================================== > Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_kmsan set ... > CPU: 0 PID: 15049 Comm: syz-executor.0 Tainted: G B 5.15.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 > Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] > dump_stack_lvl+0x1ff/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 > dump_stack+0x25/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 > panic+0x44f/0xdeb kernel/panic.c:232 > kmsan_report+0x2ee/0x300 mm/kmsan/report.c:186 > __msan_warning+0xd7/0x150 mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:208 > __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > mpol_equal include/linux/mempolicy.h:105 [inline] > vma_merge+0x4a1/0x1e60 mm/mmap.c:1190 > mbind_range+0xcc8/0x1e80 mm/mempolicy.c:811 > do_mbind+0xf42/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1333 > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > RIP: 0033:0x7f4a41b2c709 > Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > RSP: 002b:00007f4a3f0a3188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ed > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4a41c30f60 RCX: 00007f4a41b2c709 > RDX: 0000000000002001 RSI: 0000000000c00007 RDI: 0000000020012000 > RBP: 00007f4a41b86cb4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000010000000002 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > R13: 00007f4a42164b2f R14: 00007f4a3f0a3300 R15: 0000000000022000 > Hi Eric, this crash seems like the bug report [1] on Syzbot dashboard. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=028833194204bb15c2c43d822b8f7401360d57f5 If yes, maybe you can push a patch testing request. > Fixes: bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound nodes") > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> > Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > --- > mm/mempolicy.c | 16 +++++----------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > index 1592b081c58ef6dd63c6f075ad24722f2be7cb5d..7a7abdbec7af66f88bb68cb4f47e9722d56bfd5b 100644 > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > @@ -856,16 +856,6 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags, > goto out; > } > > - if (flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) { > - if (new && new->mode == MPOL_BIND) { > - new->flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON); > - } else { > - ret = -EINVAL; > - mpol_put(new); > - goto out; > - } > - } > - > ret = mpol_set_nodemask(new, nodes, scratch); > if (ret) { > mpol_put(new); > @@ -1458,7 +1448,11 @@ static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags) > return -EINVAL; > if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) > return -EINVAL; > - > + if (*flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) { > + if (mode != MPOL_BIND) > + return -EINVAL; > + *flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON); > + } > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.33.0.800.g4c38ced690-goog > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller/20211001174947.135123-1-eric.dumazet%40gmail.com.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:26 PM Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 1:49 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > > > > syzbot reported access to unitialized memory in mbind() [1] > > > > Issue came with commit bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on > > fault among multiple bound nodes") > > > > This commit added a new bit in MPOL_MODE_FLAGS, but only checked > > valid combination (MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING can only be used with MPOL_BIND) > > in do_set_mempolicy() > > > > This patch moves the check in sanitize_mpol_flags() so that it > > is also used by mbind() > > > > [1] > > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > > __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > > mpol_equal include/linux/mempolicy.h:105 [inline] > > vma_merge+0x4a1/0x1e60 mm/mmap.c:1190 > > mbind_range+0xcc8/0x1e80 mm/mempolicy.c:811 > > do_mbind+0xf42/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1333 > > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > > > Uninit was created at: > > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3221 [inline] > > slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3230 [inline] > > kmem_cache_alloc+0x751/0xff0 mm/slub.c:3235 > > mpol_new mm/mempolicy.c:293 [inline] > > do_mbind+0x912/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1289 > > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > ===================================================== > > Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_kmsan set ... > > CPU: 0 PID: 15049 Comm: syz-executor.0 Tainted: G B 5.15.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 > > Call Trace: > > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] > > dump_stack_lvl+0x1ff/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 > > dump_stack+0x25/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 > > panic+0x44f/0xdeb kernel/panic.c:232 > > kmsan_report+0x2ee/0x300 mm/kmsan/report.c:186 > > __msan_warning+0xd7/0x150 mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:208 > > __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > > mpol_equal include/linux/mempolicy.h:105 [inline] > > vma_merge+0x4a1/0x1e60 mm/mmap.c:1190 > > mbind_range+0xcc8/0x1e80 mm/mempolicy.c:811 > > do_mbind+0xf42/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1333 > > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > RIP: 0033:0x7f4a41b2c709 > > Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > > RSP: 002b:00007f4a3f0a3188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ed > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4a41c30f60 RCX: 00007f4a41b2c709 > > RDX: 0000000000002001 RSI: 0000000000c00007 RDI: 0000000020012000 > > RBP: 00007f4a41b86cb4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000010000000002 > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > > R13: 00007f4a42164b2f R14: 00007f4a3f0a3300 R15: 0000000000022000 > > > > Hi Eric, > > this crash seems like the bug report [1] on Syzbot dashboard. > > [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=028833194204bb15c2c43d822b8f7401360d57f5 > > If yes, maybe you can push a patch testing request. > No, it was a different syzbot report, currently held in our queue. (Andrew Morton has access to our internal bug, I CC him (b/201266830)) I can release it, at the expense of more noise to various mailing lists, but really the bug is trivial.
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 10:49:47AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > > syzbot reported access to unitialized memory in mbind() [1] > > Issue came with commit bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on > fault among multiple bound nodes") > > This commit added a new bit in MPOL_MODE_FLAGS, but only checked > valid combination (MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING can only be used with MPOL_BIND) > in do_set_mempolicy() > > This patch moves the check in sanitize_mpol_flags() so that it > is also used by mbind() > > [1] > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > mpol_equal include/linux/mempolicy.h:105 [inline] > vma_merge+0x4a1/0x1e60 mm/mmap.c:1190 > mbind_range+0xcc8/0x1e80 mm/mempolicy.c:811 > do_mbind+0xf42/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1333 > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > Uninit was created at: > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3221 [inline] > slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3230 [inline] > kmem_cache_alloc+0x751/0xff0 mm/slub.c:3235 > mpol_new mm/mempolicy.c:293 [inline] > do_mbind+0x912/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1289 > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > ===================================================== > Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_kmsan set ... > CPU: 0 PID: 15049 Comm: syz-executor.0 Tainted: G B 5.15.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 > Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] > dump_stack_lvl+0x1ff/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 > dump_stack+0x25/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 > panic+0x44f/0xdeb kernel/panic.c:232 > kmsan_report+0x2ee/0x300 mm/kmsan/report.c:186 > __msan_warning+0xd7/0x150 mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:208 > __mpol_equal+0x567/0x590 mm/mempolicy.c:2260 > mpol_equal include/linux/mempolicy.h:105 [inline] > vma_merge+0x4a1/0x1e60 mm/mmap.c:1190 > mbind_range+0xcc8/0x1e80 mm/mempolicy.c:811 > do_mbind+0xf42/0x15f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1333 > kernel_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1483 [inline] > __do_sys_mbind mm/mempolicy.c:1490 [inline] > __se_sys_mbind+0x437/0xb80 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > __x64_sys_mbind+0x19d/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:1486 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > RIP: 0033:0x7f4a41b2c709 > Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > RSP: 002b:00007f4a3f0a3188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ed > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4a41c30f60 RCX: 00007f4a41b2c709 > RDX: 0000000000002001 RSI: 0000000000c00007 RDI: 0000000020012000 > RBP: 00007f4a41b86cb4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000010000000002 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > R13: 00007f4a42164b2f R14: 00007f4a3f0a3300 R15: 0000000000022000 > > Fixes: bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound nodes") > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> > Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 1592b081c58ef6dd63c6f075ad24722f2be7cb5d..7a7abdbec7af66f88bb68cb4f47e9722d56bfd5b 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -856,16 +856,6 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags, goto out; } - if (flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) { - if (new && new->mode == MPOL_BIND) { - new->flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON); - } else { - ret = -EINVAL; - mpol_put(new); - goto out; - } - } - ret = mpol_set_nodemask(new, nodes, scratch); if (ret) { mpol_put(new); @@ -1458,7 +1448,11 @@ static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags) return -EINVAL; if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) return -EINVAL; - + if (*flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) { + if (mode != MPOL_BIND) + return -EINVAL; + *flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON); + } return 0; }