diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,13/13] KVM: Enable memfd based page invalidation/fallocate

Message ID 20211119134739.20218-14-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory | expand

Commit Message

Chao Peng Nov. 19, 2021, 1:47 p.m. UTC
Since the memory backing store does not get notified when VM is
destroyed so need check if VM is still live in these callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
---
 virt/kvm/memfd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

Comments

Kirill A. Shutemov Nov. 22, 2021, 2:16 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 09:47:39PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> Since the memory backing store does not get notified when VM is
> destroyed so need check if VM is still live in these callbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/memfd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/memfd.c b/virt/kvm/memfd.c
> index bd930dcb455f..bcfdc685ce22 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/memfd.c
> @@ -12,16 +12,38 @@
>  #include <linux/memfd.h>
>  const static struct guest_mem_ops *memfd_ops;
>  
> +static bool vm_is_dead(struct kvm *vm)
> +{
> +	struct kvm *kvm;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
> +		if (kvm == vm)
> +			return false;
> +	}

I don't think this is enough. The struct kvm can be freed and re-allocated
from the slab and this function will give false-negetive.

Maybe the kvm has to be tagged with a sequential id that incremented every
allocation. This id can be checked here.

> +
> +	return true;
> +}
Chao Peng Nov. 23, 2021, 1:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:16:47PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 09:47:39PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> > Since the memory backing store does not get notified when VM is
> > destroyed so need check if VM is still live in these callbacks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  virt/kvm/memfd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/memfd.c b/virt/kvm/memfd.c
> > index bd930dcb455f..bcfdc685ce22 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/memfd.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/memfd.c
> > @@ -12,16 +12,38 @@
> >  #include <linux/memfd.h>
> >  const static struct guest_mem_ops *memfd_ops;
> >  
> > +static bool vm_is_dead(struct kvm *vm)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm *kvm;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
> > +		if (kvm == vm)
> > +			return false;
> > +	}
> 
> I don't think this is enough. The struct kvm can be freed and re-allocated
> from the slab and this function will give false-negetive.

Right.

> 
> Maybe the kvm has to be tagged with a sequential id that incremented every
> allocation. This id can be checked here.

Sounds like a sequential id will be needed, no existing fields in struct
kvm can work for this.

> 
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> 
> -- 
>  Kirill A. Shutemov
Paolo Bonzini Nov. 23, 2021, 8:51 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11/19/21 14:47, Chao Peng wrote:
> +	list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
> +		if (kvm == vm)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;

This would have to take the kvm_lock, but see my reply to patch 1.

Paolo
Paolo Bonzini Nov. 23, 2021, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #4
On 11/23/21 02:06, Chao Peng wrote:
>> Maybe the kvm has to be tagged with a sequential id that incremented every
>> allocation. This id can be checked here.
> Sounds like a sequential id will be needed, no existing fields in struct
> kvm can work for this.

There's no need to new concepts when there's a perfectly usable 
reference count. :)

Paolo
Chao Peng Nov. 23, 2021, 3 p.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:09:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/23/21 02:06, Chao Peng wrote:
> > > Maybe the kvm has to be tagged with a sequential id that incremented every
> > > allocation. This id can be checked here.
> > Sounds like a sequential id will be needed, no existing fields in struct
> > kvm can work for this.
> 
> There's no need to new concepts when there's a perfectly usable reference
> count. :)

Indeed, thanks.

> 
> Paolo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/virt/kvm/memfd.c b/virt/kvm/memfd.c
index bd930dcb455f..bcfdc685ce22 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/memfd.c
@@ -12,16 +12,38 @@ 
 #include <linux/memfd.h>
 const static struct guest_mem_ops *memfd_ops;
 
+static bool vm_is_dead(struct kvm *vm)
+{
+	struct kvm *kvm;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
+		if (kvm == vm)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static void memfd_invalidate_page_range(struct inode *inode, void *owner,
 					pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
 {
 	//!!!We can get here after the owner no longer exists
+	if (vm_is_dead(owner))
+		return;
+
+	kvm_memfd_invalidate_range(owner, inode, start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+						 end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 
 static void memfd_fallocate(struct inode *inode, void *owner,
 			    pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
 {
 	//!!!We can get here after the owner no longer exists
+	if (vm_is_dead(owner))
+		return;
+
+	kvm_memfd_fallocate_range(owner, inode, start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+						end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 
 static const struct guest_ops memfd_notifier = {