From patchwork Wed Mar 9 02:12:31 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 12774657 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C701DC433EF for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 02:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 299DA8D0011; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:13:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 247378D0001; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:13:46 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 04B938D0011; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:13:46 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0223.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.223]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADE78D0001 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC83181C5553 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 02:13:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79223226810.23.374B0C3 Received: from mail-yb1-f201.google.com (mail-yb1-f201.google.com [209.85.219.201]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384C54000A for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 02:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f201.google.com with SMTP id b18-20020a25fa12000000b0062412a8200eso628319ybe.22 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2eLf1OQ5c5M4ayVX+55KychHLqSf2s8rTUtR5N1e2O4=; b=DSBgmQ9eUTcRrw9kQq29Q4Y0JJRmoNnd2Nb2N9kFoR14GzT2mxTm3gDQgBexP/LrVo Z2NOL2vJEshyz1stBhvlNlm9o1hIw+GLXoNbdmUI41AFgq7U/EAEv9vCkIYE+UGPUwrI YKzVUiMfQy/fGL0JDI86OJamBE6nKuipR4gcQTKRO3NuA0LgLHBT4aJVfQ7tt1buFRNs vPVc8u+Q3aJTrtKQHPJmmogBpUihJr1+4dSWT+aAJtUe0oAH5JELSJ27Umic3LOK20bR ImXVWkVkeaya+E4oHeXHHYk1tmK/VaRh+vVfB/AU8W6fMeg8AFFRdbJgkxn37z8p8crK fZhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2eLf1OQ5c5M4ayVX+55KychHLqSf2s8rTUtR5N1e2O4=; b=zpu7BYq1jPYn3JkxulutDGH+WQ77QIckxE0zs2d2s3I/RCvWBZuUuuiWv3ExEMd3Q2 yIGyL8yV9f1pn7tDJdrRbsJ/HFNFlzg+z0Ebh50YuUfpTx7MwJPk6h0xcwoq0YflDdX2 D49Wl+gWPrHLqhG2cm6RqV8Qd4/T5iHw/a3o+uYeaJzN0hl904lnEb/9PPIOwioyIcWz FZcjgmnEy9z2tlop3b0JUu/mW4hFXiJplNuuvvg0UYswKKRNFhDm2yeDNlvVmfPnlMJz Z251Q0pxrqsXURPmjAU7Bu6vhj7lyDtebRPZgkmBFDucdoYqw8SFP+mZC/fd9rGK+0Ix /9GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MQ6JKUNi9uMbSad6aXqXOQkUSdJGpQGrP8QAfYxhgEn2z8qfu NV+k+nL9Bz/G7HPuHjFNh0AEaj1tljQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9ktpEsJPH18SDUE8NhrJY0IwVaEMKqO0zU6IY2a37eHmSYPosfmBGxRtXJmNZGDCdh2UZxTGMidc= X-Received: from yuzhao.bld.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:183:200:57a6:54a6:aad1:c0a8]) (user=yuzhao job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0d:c283:0:b0:2db:c5f9:b519 with SMTP id e125-20020a0dc283000000b002dbc5f9b519mr15380177ywd.171.1646792024296; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:13:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:12:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20220309021230.721028-1-yuzhao@google.com> Message-Id: <20220309021230.721028-15-yuzhao@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220309021230.721028-1-yuzhao@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog Subject: [PATCH v9 14/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: design doc From: Yu Zhao To: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , Aneesh Kumar , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org, Yu Zhao , Brian Geffon , Jan Alexander Steffens , Oleksandr Natalenko , Steven Barrett , Suleiman Souhlal , Daniel Byrne , Donald Carr , " =?utf-8?q?Holger_Hoffst=C3=A4tte?= " , Konstantin Kharlamov , Shuang Zhai , Sofia Trinh , Vaibhav Jain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 384C54000A X-Stat-Signature: d58ff47rqppy1gc7jsk45b3amhzfhdgn X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=DSBgmQ9e; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of 3WA0oYgYKCCsfbgOHVNVVNSL.JVTSPUbe-TTRcHJR.VYN@flex--yuzhao.bounces.google.com designates 209.85.219.201 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=3WA0oYgYKCCsfbgOHVNVVNSL.JVTSPUbe-TTRcHJR.VYN@flex--yuzhao.bounces.google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-HE-Tag: 1646792024-717458 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Add a design doc. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao Acked-by: Brian Geffon Acked-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) Acked-by: Oleksandr Natalenko Acked-by: Steven Barrett Acked-by: Suleiman Souhlal Tested-by: Daniel Byrne Tested-by: Donald Carr Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov Tested-by: Shuang Zhai Tested-by: Sofia Trinh Tested-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Documentation/vm/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst diff --git a/Documentation/vm/index.rst b/Documentation/vm/index.rst index 44365c4574a3..b48434300226 100644 --- a/Documentation/vm/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/vm/index.rst @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ algorithms. If you are looking for advice on simply allocating memory, see the ksm memory-model mmu_notifier + multigen_lru numa overcommit-accounting page_migration diff --git a/Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst b/Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..cde60de16621 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/vm/multigen_lru.rst @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============= +Multi-Gen LRU +============= + +Design overview +=============== +Objectives +---------- +The design objectives are: + +* Good representation of access recency +* Try to profit from spatial locality +* Fast paths to make obvious choices +* Simple self-correcting heuristics + +The representation of access recency is at the core of all LRU +implementations. In the multi-gen LRU, each generation represents a +group of pages with similar access recency. Generations establish a +common frame of reference and therefore help make better choices, +e.g., between different memcgs on a computer or different computers in +a data center (for job scheduling). + +Exploiting spatial locality improves efficiency when gathering the +accessed bit. A rmap walk targets a single page and does not try to +profit from discovering a young PTE. A page table walk can sweep all +the young PTEs in an address space, but the address space can be too +large to make a profit. The key is to optimize both methods and use +them in combination. + +Fast paths reduce code complexity and runtime overhead. Unmapped pages +do not require TLB flushes; clean pages do not require writeback. +These facts are only helpful when other conditions, e.g., access +recency, are similar. With generations as a common frame of reference, +additional factors stand out. But obvious choices might not be good +choices; thus self-correction is required. + +The benefits of simple self-correcting heuristics are self-evident. +Again, with generations as a common frame of reference, this becomes +attainable. Specifically, pages in the same generation can be +categorized based on additional factors, and a feedback loop can +statistically compare the refault percentages across those categories +and infer which of them are better choices. + +Assumptions +----------- +The protection of hot pages and the selection of cold pages are based +on page access channels and patterns. There are two access channels: + +* Accesses through page tables +* Accesses through file descriptors + +The protection of the former channel is by design stronger because: + +1. The uncertainty in determining the access patterns of the former + channel is higher due to the approximation of the accessed bit. +2. The cost of evicting the former channel is higher due to the TLB + flushes required and the likelihood of encountering the dirty bit. +3. The penalty of underprotecting the former channel is higher because + applications usually do not prepare themselves for major page + faults like they do for blocked I/O. E.g., GUI applications + commonly use dedicated I/O threads to avoid blocking the rendering + threads. + +There are also two access patterns: + +* Accesses exhibiting temporal locality +* Accesses not exhibiting temporal locality + +For the reasons listed above, the former channel is assumed to follow +the former pattern unless ``VM_SEQ_READ`` or ``VM_RAND_READ`` is +present, and the latter channel is assumed to follow the latter +pattern unless outlying refaults have been observed. + +Workflow overview +================= +Evictable pages are divided into multiple generations for each +``lruvec``. The youngest generation number is stored in +``lrugen->max_seq`` for both anon and file types as they are aged on +an equal footing. The oldest generation numbers are stored in +``lrugen->min_seq[]`` separately for anon and file types as clean file +pages can be evicted regardless of swap constraints. These three +variables are monotonically increasing. + +Generation numbers are truncated into ``order_base_2(MAX_NR_GENS+1)`` +bits in order to fit into the gen counter in ``folio->flags``. Each +truncated generation number is an index to ``lrugen->lists[]``. The +sliding window technique is used to track at least ``MIN_NR_GENS`` and +at most ``MAX_NR_GENS`` generations. The gen counter stores a value +within ``[1, MAX_NR_GENS]`` while a page is on one of +``lrugen->lists[]``; otherwise it stores zero. + +Each generation is divided into multiple tiers. Tiers represent +different ranges of numbers of accesses through file descriptors. A +page accessed ``N`` times through file descriptors is in tier +``order_base_2(N)``. In contrast to moving across generations, which +requires the LRU lock, moving across tiers only requires operations on +``folio->flags`` and therefore has a negligible cost. A feedback loop +modeled after the PID controller monitors refaults over all the tiers +from anon and file types and decides which tiers from which types to +evict or protect. + +There are two conceptually independent procedures: the aging and the +eviction. They form a closed-loop system, i.e., the page reclaim. + +Aging +----- +The aging produces young generations. Given an ``lruvec``, it +increments ``max_seq`` when ``max_seq-min_seq+1`` approaches +``MIN_NR_GENS``. The aging promotes hot pages to the youngest +generation when it finds them accessed through page tables; the +demotion of cold pages happens consequently when it increments +``max_seq``. The aging uses page table walks and rmap walks to find +young PTEs. For the former, it iterates ``lruvec_memcg()->mm_list`` +and calls ``walk_page_range()`` with each ``mm_struct`` on this list +to scan PTEs. On finding a young PTE, it clears the accessed bit and +updates the gen counter of the page mapped by this PTE to +``(max_seq%MAX_NR_GENS)+1``. After each iteration of this list, it +increments ``max_seq``. For the latter, when the eviction walks the +rmap and finds a young PTE, the aging scans the adjacent PTEs and +follows the same steps just described. + +Eviction +-------- +The eviction consumes old generations. Given an ``lruvec``, it +increments ``min_seq`` when ``lrugen->lists[]`` indexed by +``min_seq%MAX_NR_GENS`` becomes empty. To select a type and a tier to +evict from, it first compares ``min_seq[]`` to select the older type. +If both types are equally old, it selects the one whose first tier has +a lower refault percentage. The first tier contains single-use +unmapped clean pages, which are the best bet. The eviction sorts a +page according to the gen counter if the aging has found this page +accessed through page tables and updated the gen counter. It also +moves a page to the next generation, i.e., ``min_seq+1``, if this page +was accessed multiple times through file descriptors and the feedback +loop has detected outlying refaults from the tier this page is in. To +do this, the feedback loop uses the first tier as the baseline, for +the reason stated earlier. + +Summary +------- +The multi-gen LRU can be disassembled into the following parts: + +* Generations +* Page table walks +* Rmap walks +* Bloom filters +* The PID controller + +The aging and the eviction is a producer-consumer model; specifically, +the latter drives the former by the sliding window over generations. +Within the aging, rmap walks drive page table walks by inserting hot +densely populated page tables to the Bloom filters. Within the +eviction, the PID controller uses refaults as the feedback to select +types to evict and tiers to protect.