[156/227] memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

Commit Message

Andrew Morton March 22, 2022, 9:46 p.m. UTC

From: Huang Ying <[e-mail]>
Subject: memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

If the NUMA balancing isn't used to optimize the page placement among
sockets but only among memory types, the hot pages in the fast memory
node couldn't be migrated (promoted) to anywhere.  So it's unnecessary
to scan the pages in the fast memory node via changing their PTE/PMD
mapping to be PROT_NONE.  So that the page faults could be avoided too.

In the test, if only the memory tiering NUMA balancing mode is enabled,
the number of the NUMA balancing hint faults for the DRAM node is
reduced to almost 0 with the patch.  While the benchmark score doesn't
change visibly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <[e-mail]>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <[e-mail]>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <[e-mail]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <[e-mail]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[e-mail]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[e-mail]>
Cc: Zi Yan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Wei Xu <[e-mail]>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <[e-mail]>
Cc: zhongjiang-ali <[e-mail]>
Cc: Feng Tang <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[e-mail]>
---

 mm/huge_memory.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 mm/mprotect.c    |   13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Patch

--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/oom.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/page_owner.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -1766,17 +1767,28 @@  int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struc
 	}
 #endif
 
-	/*
-	 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
-	 * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
-	 * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
-	 */
-	if (prot_numa && is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
-		goto unlock;
+	if (prot_numa) {
+		struct page *page;
+		/*
+		 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
+		 * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
+		 * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
+		 */
+		if (is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
+			goto unlock;
 
-	if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd))
-		goto unlock;
+		if (pmd_protnone(*pmd))
+			goto unlock;
 
+		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
+		/*
+		 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
+		 * balancing is disabled
+		 */
+		if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+		    node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page)))
+			goto unlock;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * In case prot_numa, we are under mmap_read_lock(mm). It's critical
 	 * to not clear pmd intermittently to avoid race with MADV_DONTNEED
--- a/mm/mprotect.c~memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory
+++ a/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@  static unsigned long change_pte_range(st
 			 */
 			if (prot_numa) {
 				struct page *page;
+				int nid;
 
 				/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
 				if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
@@ -109,7 +111,16 @@  static unsigned long change_pte_range(st
 				 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
 				 * a single-threaded process is running on.
 				 */
-				if (target_node == page_to_nid(page))
+				nid = page_to_nid(page);
+				if (target_node == nid)
+					continue;
+
+				/*
+				 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
+				 * balancing is disabled
+				 */
+				if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+				    node_is_toptier(nid))
 					continue;
 			}