diff mbox series

[v2,2/2] hugetlb: Fix return value of __setup handlers

Message ID 20220401101232.2790280-3-liupeng256@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series hugetlb: Fix confusing behavior | expand

Commit Message

Peng Liu April 1, 2022, 10:12 a.m. UTC
When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the
entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb
calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter
string.

The following phenomenon is observed:
 cmdline:
  hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1
 dmesg:
  HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y
  HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring
  Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1"

Since hugetlb will print warn or error information before return for
invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again.

Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

David Hildenbrand April 1, 2022, 10:46 a.m. UTC | #1
On 01.04.22 12:12, Peng Liu wrote:
> When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the
> entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb
> calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter
> string.
> 
> The following phenomenon is observed:
>  cmdline:
>   hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1
>  dmesg:
>   HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y
>   HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring
>   Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1"
> 
> Since hugetlb will print warn or error information before return for
> invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 9cd746432ca9..6dde34c115c9 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4131,12 +4131,11 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
>  	int count;
>  	unsigned long tmp;
>  	char *p = s;
> -	int ret = 1;

Adding this in #1 to remove it in #2 is a bit sub-optimal IMHO.
Peng Liu April 2, 2022, 1:33 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2022/4/1 18:46, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.04.22 12:12, Peng Liu wrote:
>> When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the
>> entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb
>> calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter
>> string.
>>
>> The following phenomenon is observed:
>>   cmdline:
>>    hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1
>>   dmesg:
>>    HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y
>>    HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring
>>    Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1"
>>
>> Since hugetlb will print warn or error information before return for
>> invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu<liupeng256@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/hugetlb.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 9cd746432ca9..6dde34c115c9 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -4131,12 +4131,11 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
>>   	int count;
>>   	unsigned long tmp;
>>   	char *p = s;
>> -	int ret = 1;
> Adding this in #1 to remove it in #2 is a bit sub-optimal IMHO.
>
For #2, which is not necessary for stable, #1 may be needed for stable, 
this is why we split #2 into a single patch.
David Hildenbrand April 4, 2022, 10:25 a.m. UTC | #3
On 02.04.22 03:33, liupeng (DM) wrote:
> 
> On 2022/4/1 18:46, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 01.04.22 12:12, Peng Liu wrote:
>>> When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the
>>> entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb
>>> calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter
>>> string.
>>>
>>> The following phenomenon is observed:
>>>  cmdline:
>>>   hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1
>>>  dmesg:
>>>   HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y
>>>   HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring
>>>   Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1"
>>>
>>> Since hugetlb will print warn or error information before return for
>>> invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/hugetlb.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> index 9cd746432ca9..6dde34c115c9 100644
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> @@ -4131,12 +4131,11 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
>>>  	int count;
>>>  	unsigned long tmp;
>>>  	char *p = s;
>>> -	int ret = 1;
>> Adding this in #1 to remove it in #2 is a bit sub-optimal IMHO.
>>
> For #2, which is not necessary for stable, #1 may be needed for stable,
> this is why we split #2 into a single patch.
> 

Again, I don't think #1 is stable material, sorry.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 9cd746432ca9..6dde34c115c9 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -4131,12 +4131,11 @@  static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 	int count;
 	unsigned long tmp;
 	char *p = s;
-	int ret = 1;
 
 	if (!parsed_valid_hugepagesz) {
 		pr_warn("HugeTLB: hugepages=%s does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring\n", s);
 		parsed_valid_hugepagesz = true;
-		return 0;
+		return 1;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -4152,7 +4151,7 @@  static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 
 	if (mhp == last_mhp) {
 		pr_warn("HugeTLB: hugepages= specified twice without interleaving hugepagesz=, ignoring hugepages=%s\n", s);
-		return 0;
+		return 1;
 	}
 
 	while (*p) {
@@ -4163,7 +4162,7 @@  static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 		if (p[count] == ':') {
 			if (!hugetlb_node_alloc_supported()) {
 				pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
-				return 0;
+				return 1;
 			}
 			if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
 				goto invalid;
@@ -4201,11 +4200,10 @@  static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 
 	last_mhp = mhp;
 
-	return ret;
+	return 1;
 
 invalid:
 	pr_warn("HugeTLB: Invalid hugepages parameter %s\n", p);
-	ret = 0;
 	goto out;
 }
 __setup("hugepages=", hugepages_setup);
@@ -4227,7 +4225,7 @@  static int __init hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
 
 	if (!arch_hugetlb_valid_size(size)) {
 		pr_err("HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=%s\n", s);
-		return 0;
+		return 1;
 	}
 
 	h = size_to_hstate(size);
@@ -4242,7 +4240,7 @@  static int __init hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
 		if (!parsed_default_hugepagesz ||  h != &default_hstate ||
 		    default_hstate.max_huge_pages) {
 			pr_warn("HugeTLB: hugepagesz=%s specified twice, ignoring\n", s);
-			return 0;
+			return 1;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -4273,14 +4271,14 @@  static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
 	parsed_valid_hugepagesz = false;
 	if (parsed_default_hugepagesz) {
 		pr_err("HugeTLB: default_hugepagesz previously specified, ignoring %s\n", s);
-		return 0;
+		return 1;
 	}
 
 	size = (unsigned long)memparse(s, NULL);
 
 	if (!arch_hugetlb_valid_size(size)) {
 		pr_err("HugeTLB: unsupported default_hugepagesz=%s\n", s);
-		return 0;
+		return 1;
 	}
 
 	hugetlb_add_hstate(ilog2(size) - PAGE_SHIFT);