| Message ID | 20220704092605.19604-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | secretmem: drop unneeded initialization in secretmem_file_create() | expand |
On 7/4/22 2:26 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > Drop the unneeded initialization of the local variable file in function > secretmem_file_create(). > > No functional change and no change in the resulting object code. > > This unneeded initialization was already introduced with the introduction > of secretmem in commit 1507f51255c9 ("mm: introduce memfd_secret system > call to create "secret" memory areas"). You may need to be more specific about this commit, the whole function, including this initialization was introduced at this time. Otherwise, change looks fine. Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > This minor code-stylistic issue > was discovered as a dead store with clang-analyzer. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> > --- > Mike, please ack. > > Andrew, please pick this minor stylistic clean-up patch. Thanks. > > mm/secretmem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c > index 7584aab54d20..46b431d62761 100644 > --- a/mm/secretmem.c > +++ b/mm/secretmem.c > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *secretmem_mnt; > > static struct file *secretmem_file_create(unsigned long flags) > { > - struct file *file = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + struct file *file; > struct inode *inode; > const char *anon_name = "[secretmem]"; > const struct qstr qname = QSTR_INIT(anon_name, strlen(anon_name));
Hi Lukas, On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 11:26:05AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > Drop the unneeded initialization of the local variable file in function > secretmem_file_create(). > > No functional change and no change in the resulting object code. > > This unneeded initialization was already introduced with the introduction > of secretmem in commit 1507f51255c9 ("mm: introduce memfd_secret system > call to create "secret" memory areas"). This minor code-stylistic issue > was discovered as a dead store with clang-analyzer. You are right and in the current code the initialization is unneeded, but there's a pending patch that relies of this initialization: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yr1jKwz2+SGxjcuW@kernel.org/ Let's wait and see how that fix develops. > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> > --- > Mike, please ack. > > Andrew, please pick this minor stylistic clean-up patch. Thanks. > > mm/secretmem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c > index 7584aab54d20..46b431d62761 100644 > --- a/mm/secretmem.c > +++ b/mm/secretmem.c > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *secretmem_mnt; > > static struct file *secretmem_file_create(unsigned long flags) > { > - struct file *file = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + struct file *file; > struct inode *inode; > const char *anon_name = "[secretmem]"; > const struct qstr qname = QSTR_INIT(anon_name, strlen(anon_name)); > -- > 2.17.1 >
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 6:30 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 11:26:05AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > Drop the unneeded initialization of the local variable file in function > > secretmem_file_create(). > > > > No functional change and no change in the resulting object code. > > > > This unneeded initialization was already introduced with the introduction > > of secretmem in commit 1507f51255c9 ("mm: introduce memfd_secret system > > call to create "secret" memory areas"). This minor code-stylistic issue > > was discovered as a dead store with clang-analyzer. > > You are right and in the current code the initialization is unneeded, but > there's a pending patch that relies of this initialization: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yr1jKwz2+SGxjcuW@kernel.org/ > > Let's wait and see how that fix develops. > Agree. I will continue tracking the evolution of this function and resend my patch if this patch above does not land in the next six months. For now, this clean-up patch here can be ignored. Lukas
diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c index 7584aab54d20..46b431d62761 100644 --- a/mm/secretmem.c +++ b/mm/secretmem.c @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *secretmem_mnt; static struct file *secretmem_file_create(unsigned long flags) { - struct file *file = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + struct file *file; struct inode *inode; const char *anon_name = "[secretmem]"; const struct qstr qname = QSTR_INIT(anon_name, strlen(anon_name));
Drop the unneeded initialization of the local variable file in function secretmem_file_create(). No functional change and no change in the resulting object code. This unneeded initialization was already introduced with the introduction of secretmem in commit 1507f51255c9 ("mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas"). This minor code-stylistic issue was discovered as a dead store with clang-analyzer. Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> --- Mike, please ack. Andrew, please pick this minor stylistic clean-up patch. Thanks. mm/secretmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)